The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » SNR

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

SNR [message #95592]

Tue, 05 February 2008 14:26

chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

accountants dance or look at
>> paintings
>> by politicians. There are plenty of well-informed commentators on current
>> affairs who specialize on that, if Tim wants to make a difference he
>> should
>> volunteer.
>>
>> As far as John Adams, it's hard to hear his take on Hamilton and not wind
>> up hating the guy. Nobody, not even Thomas Jefferson, hated Hamilton more
>> than Adams. Hamilton was also far from a 'pawn' of bunch of nefarious
>> bankers.
>> Pawn implied control by others. Hamilton was keenly aware of how finance
>> worked, often to a greater degree than the bankers he was dealing with,
>> and
>> turned out to be right more often than not. His vision of America, as a
>> dominant
>> power in the Western hemisphere built on a powerful manufacturing economy
>> and a strong currency backed by a central bank, was more or less right.
>> Jefferson's
>> yeomen farmers reaping the fruits of their own labor and the labor of
>> their
>> dark hued indentured help, while reading Gibbon in the library at night,
>> was winsome and romantic. Hell, even Jefferson, with his sizzling gifts
>> and
>> endless energy, couldn't manage to get out of debt in his life.
>><

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		SNR By: chuck duffy on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:26
		Re: SNR By: D-unit on Tue, 05 February 2008 13:34
		Re: SNR By: John [1] on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:47
		Re: SNR By: Neil on Tue, 05 February 2008 15:11
		Re: SNR By: Don Nafe on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:24
		Re: SNR By: John [1] on Wed, 06 February 2008 05:27
		Re: SNR By: chuck duffy on Tue, 05 February 2008 15:14
		Re: SNR By: TCB on Tue, 05 February 2008 16:07
		Re: SNR By: Neil on Tue, 05 February 2008 16:35
		Re: SNR By: TCB on Wed, 06 February 2008 07:18
		Re: SNR By: Jamie K on Wed, 06 February 2008 09:24
		Re: SNR By: neil[1] on Wed, 06 February 2008 11:21
		Re: SNR By: chuck duffy on Tue, 05 February 2008 17:07
		Re: SNR By: TCB on Wed, 06 February 2008 07:16
		Re: SNR By: John [1] on Wed, 06 February 2008 05:27
		Re: SNR By: chuck duffy on Wed, 06 February 2008 06:01
		Re: SNR By: Erling on Thu, 07 February 2008 01:21
		Re: SNR By: Deej [5] on Thu, 07 February 2008 13:29
		Re: SNR By: Deej [5] on Thu, 07 February 2008 13:32
		Re: SNR By: Aaron Allen on Thu, 07 February 2008 16:22
		Re: SNR By: Dedric Terry on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:00
		Re: SNR By: Deej [5] on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:24
		Re: SNR By: Don Nafe on Tue, 05 February 2008 13:53
		Re: SNR By: chuck duffy on Tue, 05 February 2008 15:13
		Re: SNR By: Carl Amburn on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:07
		Re: SNR By: steve the artguy on Wed, 06 February 2008 01:18
		Re: SNR By: chuck duffy on Tue, 05 February 2008 15:24
		Re: SNR By: Don Nafe on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:22
		Re: SNR By: Jamie K on Tue, 05 February 2008 14:19
		Re: SNR By: Kim on Tue, 05 February 2008 21:37
		Re: SNR By: Jamie K on Tue, 05 February 2008 20:31
		Re: SNR By: Neil on Tue, 05 February 2008 23:29
		Re: SNR By: Jamie K on Wed, 06 February 2008 00:02
		Re: SNR By: Sarah on Wed, 06 February 2008 01:00
		Re: SNR By: Kim on Wed, 06 February 2008 02:33
		Re: SNR By: rick on Wed, 06 February 2008 02:02

Previous Topic:	Babyface...WOW
Next Topic:	OT: now this makes econonmic sense.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu May 07 13:52:09 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01036 seconds