The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Do you know?
Do you know? [message #97741] Thu, 03 April 2008 19:39 Go to next message
zmora is currently offline  zmora
Messages: 88
Registered: August 2005
Member
ere that I'd prefer not to edit out, so some kind of gentle gate seems
> to be the best option. Opinions requested.
>
> TCBwith a widescreen monitor?

i hate this card.

jLHi Jeremy,

Many have said Matrox is evil. I've had and used a G400 and a G550 PCI.
Drivers seem lame. Card is slow by today's standard. It surprises me that
it was worthy of a PCIe interface. I'd say lose the card.

Tom




"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
> with a widescreen monitor?
>
> i hate this card.
>
> jL
>Dump the matrox, get a GeForce/nVidia card. You will be SO much happier man.
AA


"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
> with a widescreen monitor?
>
> i hate this card.
>
> jL
>Yeah, have to agree about Matrox.
If you want to run 3 or 4 monitors, I came across a 1x PCI-E
card which would complement a 16x card, if you only have one 16X slot.
I bought one and it's very good.

http://cgi.ebay.com/GeForce-7300GT-128MB-DDR3-DVI-VGA-PCI-E- 1X-HDTV-Card_W0QQitemZ110267377972QQihZ001QQcategoryZ3762QQt cZphotoQQcmdZViewItem

"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Dump the matrox, get a GeForce/nVidia card. You will be SO much happier
man.
>AA
>
>
>"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
>> with a widescreen monitor?
>>
>> i hate this card.
>>
>> jL
>>
>
>yeah, now they're blue su
Re: Do you know? [message #97743 is a reply to message #97741] Thu, 03 April 2008 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
>>> with a widescreen monitor?
>>>
>>> i hate this card.
>>>
>>> jL
>>>
>>
>>
>AMD owns ATI. Depends I guess on what chipset is on your mobo. Do you know
what they are?

If it's an AMD chipset, I'd probably do ATI video, and if it's anything
else, I'd go nVidia.

AA


"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487f8256@linux...
> anyone know what would work well with a tyan mobo with dual opterons?
>
>
> "Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote in message news:487f2b04$1@linux...
>>
>> Yeah, have to agree about Matrox.
>> If you want to run 3 or 4 monitors, I came across a 1x PCI-E
>> card which would complement a 16x card, if you only have one 16X slot.
>> I bought one and it's very good.
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/GeForce-7300GT-128MB-DDR3-DVI-VGA-PCI-E- 1X-HDTV-Card_W0QQitemZ110267377972QQihZ001QQcategoryZ3762QQt cZphotoQQcmdZViewItem
>>
>> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>Dump the matrox, get a GeForce/nVidia card. You will be SO much happier
>> man.
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>>"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>news:487e8046@linux...
>>>> with a widescreen monitor?
>>>>
>>>> i hate this card.
>>>>
>>>> jL
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Comments? Thoughts?Hey Mike,

I could have used a click a million times so far. Syncing up
cubase for a simple click is an extra effort
Re: Do you know? [message #97747 is a reply to message #97741] Fri, 04 April 2008 05:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chuck duffy is currently offline  chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
7 bpm,

>etc...)
>
>Is that doable?
>
>AA
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>
>> Comments? Thoughts?
>
>Hi Tom,

I was thinking of the sinewav beep for now, just because I'd have to figure
out how to load a wav file in via a text file, plus I'm not sure how the
circular arrays would work with that. But, it might be possible.

Would a beep be unacceptable?Hi Rod,

I agree that that works ok. I think it is off in 44.1, though. The PARIS
app doesn't adjust the bars and beats for 44.1 as far as I can tell. I could
be wrong, though.

All the best,

Mike

"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Tom, you can assign cubase to play any sound you want for the click, under
>"metronome" .
>I find the click very easy to set up in Paris. set the project tempo, then
>control C, control L, type in 600 or whatever, and hit enter. (I have a
click
>sample sitting on track 16, beat 1 of my default ppj.
>Rod
>"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Hey Mike,
>>
>>I could have used a click a million times so far. Syncing up
>>cubase for a simple click is an extra effort I try to avoid. Will this
>>trigger on board sound(s) paf or wav I hope? I'm a sidestick kind
>>of click guy and not the cubase sign wave annoying beep. Less steps
>>are a good thing for me.
>>
>>Great idea!
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Comments? Thoughts?
>>
>>
>Hi Aaron,

It would match the grid at 48k with no tempo changes only. I can't change
the PARIS app, unfortunately.

But, I could code, say, four regions that you could define tempos for. I
think that's a cool idea.

"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>I'd use it if it had 2 things:
>
>Locks to/matches grid
>Able to map tempo changes (IE, bars 1 - 32 @ 96bpm, bars 33-56 @ 107 bpm,

>etc...)
>
>
Re: Do you know? [message #97749 is a reply to message #97747] Fri, 04 April 2008 06:18 Go to previous message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>
>> Comments? Thoughts?
>
>better make that 402. I've been away for a while too.....
Harry Latimer
Good Day Mix

"Mike Bloomer" <tubeguru2006@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:486d9892$1@linux...
>
> better make that 401. I've been away for a while.....
> MB
>
>
> Kerry Galloway <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote:
>>Hi folks. Hereıs one of a series of updates/info posts (and - brace
>>yourselves - some action requests) which Iıll be putting in separate
>>posts.
>>
>>Iıve been working on some basic infrastructure that I reckon we need to
>>support any forward motion. Blog/wiki/networking/development rig are
>>certainly part of that infrastructure but we also had a serious need for
>>hard info - things like current community size and composition etc. If we
>>want to tell outside developers who we are as a community, we better know
>>who we are first, and I had the suspicion that my "spitball" guesstimates
>>weren't doing us much justice.
>>
>>Now, Iım not trained in data collection and analysis but I do fine at
>>research and detective work, and what I lack in skills I cheerfully
>>supplement with grunt work. I wanted to share one of the results of that
>>basic research with you all.
>>
>>Iıve seen the question ³how big is the PARIS community?² asked several
>>times
>>before. As far as I know we never got a definitive answer. We've now got
> a
>>fairly firm "floor" for the size of the current PARIS user community. It
>>stands at an eye-opening (at least to me) 125 current users - and rising,
> so
>>if anything thatıs an undercount. Mike Audet and I have independently come
>>to an estimate of the user community worldwide (including PARIS users who
>>don't come to the NG) as being in the vicinity of a healthy 400 current
>>users.
>>
>>Surprised? Not bad for eight years after discontinuation!
>>
>>Iıll be clear - this is not derived from the number of NG posters - itıs
>>derived from a fairly accurate hand count of the number of currently
>>active
>>PARIS *users* that Iıve identified on the NG over the last ten months, and
>>is distinct from the size of the NG community itself. We needed that info
>>broken out separately because while some developments (say the ability to
>>open PARIS .ppjs without a PARIS rig) might indeed be of interest to
>>ex-PARIS users too (who might still retain archives in .ppj format), other
>>developments (say drivers) would really only be of interest to those who
>>still ha
Previous Topic: Norman Smith gone ....
Next Topic: OT: Freddy Mercury movie.... anyone know?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 06 21:01:04 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08304 seconds