| Do you know? [message #97741] |
Thu, 03 April 2008 19:39  |
zmora
Messages: 88 Registered: August 2005
|
Member |
|
|
ere that I'd prefer not to edit out, so some kind of gentle gate seems
> to be the best option. Opinions requested.
>
> TCBwith a widescreen monitor?
i hate this card.
jLHi Jeremy,
Many have said Matrox is evil. I've had and used a G400 and a G550 PCI.
Drivers seem lame. Card is slow by today's standard. It surprises me that
it was worthy of a PCIe interface. I'd say lose the card.
Tom
"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
> with a widescreen monitor?
>
> i hate this card.
>
> jL
>Dump the matrox, get a GeForce/nVidia card. You will be SO much happier man.
AA
"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
> with a widescreen monitor?
>
> i hate this card.
>
> jL
>Yeah, have to agree about Matrox.
If you want to run 3 or 4 monitors, I came across a 1x PCI-E
card which would complement a 16x card, if you only have one 16X slot.
I bought one and it's very good.
http://cgi.ebay.com/GeForce-7300GT-128MB-DDR3-DVI-VGA-PCI-E- 1X-HDTV-Card_W0QQitemZ110267377972QQihZ001QQcategoryZ3762QQt cZphotoQQcmdZViewItem
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Dump the matrox, get a GeForce/nVidia card. You will be SO much happier
man.
>AA
>
>
>"jeremy luzier" <none@comcast.net> wrote in message news:487e8046@linux...
>> with a widescreen monitor?
>>
>> i hate this card.
>>
>> jL
>>
>
>yeah, now they're blue su
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Do you know? [message #97747 is a reply to message #97741] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 05:18   |
chuck duffy
Messages: 453 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
7 bpm,
>etc...)
>
>Is that doable?
>
>AA
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>
>> Comments? Thoughts?
>
>Hi Tom,
I was thinking of the sinewav beep for now, just because I'd have to figure
out how to load a wav file in via a text file, plus I'm not sure how the
circular arrays would work with that. But, it might be possible.
Would a beep be unacceptable?Hi Rod,
I agree that that works ok. I think it is off in 44.1, though. The PARIS
app doesn't adjust the bars and beats for 44.1 as far as I can tell. I could
be wrong, though.
All the best,
Mike
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Tom, you can assign cubase to play any sound you want for the click, under
>"metronome" .
>I find the click very easy to set up in Paris. set the project tempo, then
>control C, control L, type in 600 or whatever, and hit enter. (I have a
click
>sample sitting on track 16, beat 1 of my default ppj.
>Rod
>"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Hey Mike,
>>
>>I could have used a click a million times so far. Syncing up
>>cubase for a simple click is an extra effort I try to avoid. Will this
>>trigger on board sound(s) paf or wav I hope? I'm a sidestick kind
>>of click guy and not the cubase sign wave annoying beep. Less steps
>>are a good thing for me.
>>
>>Great idea!
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Comments? Thoughts?
>>
>>
>Hi Aaron,
It would match the grid at 48k with no tempo changes only. I can't change
the PARIS app, unfortunately.
But, I could code, say, four regions that you could define tempos for. I
think that's a cool idea.
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>I'd use it if it had 2 things:
>
>Locks to/matches grid
>Able to map tempo changes (IE, bars 1 - 32 @ 96bpm, bars 33-56 @ 107 bpm,
>etc...)
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Do you know? [message #97749 is a reply to message #97747] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 06:18  |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>
>> Comments? Thoughts?
>
>better make that 402. I've been away for a while too.....
Harry Latimer
Good Day Mix
"Mike Bloomer" <tubeguru2006@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:486d9892$1@linux...
>
> better make that 401. I've been away for a while.....
> MB
>
>
> Kerry Galloway <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote:
>>Hi folks. Hereıs one of a series of updates/info posts (and - brace
>>yourselves - some action requests) which Iıll be putting in separate
>>posts.
>>
>>Iıve been working on some basic infrastructure that I reckon we need to
>>support any forward motion. Blog/wiki/networking/development rig are
>>certainly part of that infrastructure but we also had a serious need for
>>hard info - things like current community size and composition etc. If we
>>want to tell outside developers who we are as a community, we better know
>>who we are first, and I had the suspicion that my "spitball" guesstimates
>>weren't doing us much justice.
>>
>>Now, Iım not trained in data collection and analysis but I do fine at
>>research and detective work, and what I lack in skills I cheerfully
>>supplement with grunt work. I wanted to share one of the results of that
>>basic research with you all.
>>
>>Iıve seen the question ³how big is the PARIS community?² asked several
>>times
>>before. As far as I know we never got a definitive answer. We've now got
> a
>>fairly firm "floor" for the size of the current PARIS user community. It
>>stands at an eye-opening (at least to me) 125 current users - and rising,
> so
>>if anything thatıs an undercount. Mike Audet and I have independently come
>>to an estimate of the user community worldwide (including PARIS users who
>>don't come to the NG) as being in the vicinity of a healthy 400 current
>>users.
>>
>>Surprised? Not bad for eight years after discontinuation!
>>
>>Iıll be clear - this is not derived from the number of NG posters - itıs
>>derived from a fairly accurate hand count of the number of currently
>>active
>>PARIS *users* that Iıve identified on the NG over the last ten months, and
>>is distinct from the size of the NG community itself. We needed that info
>>broken out separately because while some developments (say the ability to
>>open PARIS .ppjs without a PARIS rig) might indeed be of interest to
>>ex-PARIS users too (who might still retain archives in .ppj format), other
>>developments (say drivers) would really only be of interest to those who
>>still ha
|
|
|
|