Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Latency Checker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Latency Checker [message #95854 is a reply to message #95772] |
Mon, 11 February 2008 07:17   |
Ed
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
page there where you'd normally go to find this info, and I'm in
the process of developing it. I should caution you in advance that Deej, who
was the contributor of the posted info, has warned us that these times are
from an earlier version of the UAD and may no longer be operative. I'll post
verified/current UAD latencies as they become available, and in the
meantime, just in case any of the currently posted numbers seem to work for
you, you'll find the page at:
http://www.kerrygalloway.com/WikiPARIS/wikka.php?wakka=Nativ eLatencyDatabase
- Kerry
On 4/28/08 2:22 PM, in article 48164026$1@linux, "Gary Flanigan"
<gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>
> I know that several of the plugs, such as the Pultec and the Neve EQs, have
> slightly higher latency. But what is the latency, in samples, of the majority
> of the plugs?
>
> ThanksI dislike Vista. Mostly I dislike how it manages folders for different file
types. Me, I like a certain layout for all my files and folders, ie, name,
size, type, modified, attrib. In Vista, if I copy pics from my camera or
..wav files or .mp3 files from a zip drive or CD to a folder in Vista is
creates crap like, genre, and 2,3,4,5 stars, and album, and artist, so on.
Also, the administrator pop ups are annoying as hell. I do not use Vista
for recording. Also, you need at least 1gig ram for Vista basis and 2 gig
for Vista premium just for the system to run at a decent speed.
WayneTyrone,
Thanks for the tip. When I get a chance I'll contact both the NG software
makers and perhaps even Google and see if it can't be resolved.
You should be on Firefox though anyhow. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I have had problems for more than a year connecting to the NG. Often times
>when trying to connect my internet explorer would crash. I had posted this
>problem with no solution being found. This has significantly affected my
>usage of the NG and between being incredibly busy and frustrated with the
>crashes, I was forced to move on.
>
>Having been away for sometime, I tried posting again and the usual occured....crash
>city...it would seem that if I tried enough times I would get through without
>understanding how I did it.
>
>Well, I just found out that it seems my Google toolbar (not sure how or
when
>I started using it), seems to be the culprit. I reset my IE to factory settings
>and all seems well...at least for now.
>
>Now I can chat with my Paris buddies without hassel...life is good!Hey "T",
I use a Dell Inspiron 6000. I won't recommend it because when the pwr
supply is plug'd in I hear noise from poor grounding. I think it's a Dell
problem. The only way to get rid of the noise is to unplug the pwr cord and
run on batteries or, I've got a 2' wire with alligator clips on both sides
and I manually ground the laptop to my mackie board or pwr amp or any bare
steel.
2. Even though I only use the laptop to create and edit midi sequences (to
later dump into Paris), I do still record rough audio (vox and acoustic gtr)
to it via M-audio MobilePre USB 2.0 so that it's easier for me to build the
midi sequences. The mobile pre is 2 in and 2 out with headphone. In other
words, I find a simple midi drum loop, loop it for 4 minutes, play the
acoustic and sing and then I begin building the sequences.
I tried the mobile pre by itself but I didn't like the direct monitor
function. This would have been ideal, (the mobilepre fit in the laptop
case) but as you will see, I now have to haul around a mini mixer also.
I just use Sonar Cakewalk Home Studio and the efx's only work on playback so
while singing a rough take onto or into a midi sequence project, I have no
reverb. Blah! So, what I have done for my portable rig is run the mic and
acoustic into my CFX12 mackie with built in digital efx. I route channel
|
|
|
|
| Re: Latency Checker [message #95855 is a reply to message #95765] |
Mon, 11 February 2008 07:26 |
Ed
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
5
(vox) out of aux 1 and channel 6 (acoustic) out aux 2 to the mobile pre and
via USB into the laptop Cakewalk project. I mute these two tracks in the
project while recording. The aux sends are dry signals for recording.
While I'm recording, the project is playing back the drum loops or bass
lines or whatever keyboard parts are on the sequence. The mobilepre grabs
the laptop audio via the USB and sends it to my mackie channel 1 and 2
(L/R). So I listen to L/R playback and I let the acoustic and vox signal
continue down thru the mackie channels and into the mains. The mains now
contain the project L/R playback and my vocal and acoustic signals with the
efx's placed on the mains so I have some or a lot of reverb as I'm tracking.
I listen via headphone output which is the mains signal out with efx's.
Hope this helps.
WayneSome of the Celeron and the last Pentium 3 processors use motherboards that
have the Flip Chip - Pin Grid Array or FC - PGA socket. - This is not a new
socket, just a new name for Socket 370.
However, Socket 370 is now dead. The Celeron and Celeron D (not a dual-core)
processors do not use Socket 370 or Socket 478 motherboards, they use the
same LGA775 socket as Pentium D (dual-core) and Pentium 4 processors, both
of which have been superceded.
Intel Pentium 4 processors (superceded) use the earlier Socket 423 and
Socket 478, or the current Socket LGA775 motherboards, which run the latest
Intel Core 2 Duo (dual-core processors) and Intel Core Quad (quad-core
processors).
http://www.pcbuyerbeware.co.uk/Sockets.htm
No, it's not the same. This kind of upgrade would be more for someone that
already has this type of mobo, IMO or knows where to get one.
AA
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48161873$1@linux...
>
> Hey Aaron, My MOBO is Socket 478 P4. I don't think it will take a Xeon,
> or
> will it?
>
> Here are the specs again:
> http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=648F_Neo -L
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> http://www.mwave.com/mwave/skuinc.hmx?sku=ba24819&promo= MP
>>
>>Intel XEON SL72G 3.06 Ghz Processor w/1MB Cache
>>$50 Clearance Discount!
>>Your Price: $19.95
>>
>>Technical Information:
>>
>>a.. sSpec Number: SL72G
>>a.. CPU Speed: 3.06 GHz
>>a.. PCG:
>>a.. Bus Speed: 533 MHz
>>a.. Bus/Core Ratio: 23
>>a.. L3 Cache Size: 1 MB
>>a.. L3 Cache Speed: 3.06
>>a.. GHz Package Type: Micro-FCPGA
>>a.. Manufacturing Technology: 0.13 micron
>>a.. Core Stepping: M0
>>a.. CPUID String: 0F25h
>>a.. Thermal Design Power: 87W
>>a.. Thermal Specification: 70°C
>>a.. VID Voltage Range: 1.525V
>>
>>with repetitive algos like audio plugs use, the ext
|
|
|
|
| Re: Latency Checker [message #95856 is a reply to message #95854] |
Mon, 11 February 2008 07:36 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ra cache could be a big
>
>>deal for ya. Just make sure you have the right socket for it and mobo
>>support.
>>
>>
>>AA
>>
>>
>That's kind of a loaded question. I'd say start by looking over reviews at
Tom's Hardware to see what was recommended in the past, sifting out the nut
case crowd (IE, no overclocking/how far can I push it types). It's entirely
possible that you can't find a mobo for it, which is more or less why I said
upgrade instead of new rig. I see this as more of an upgrade to someone
that already has a compatible motherboard.
I'd say the standard for this era CPU are going to be 5 PCI slots, onboard
USB and stick to name brands like Asus, Abit or Gigabyte. Use Intel chipset
for the motherboard. This is a socket 370, also known as a flip chip also
known as FCPGA (Flip Chip - Pin Grid Array). That is the CPU socket you're
looking for in the bargain bins for mother boards.
http://www.pcbuyerbeware.co.uk:80/Sockets.htm
Hopefully that helps clear up some things?
AA
"Rich" <studiodog@milwaukeerocks.com> wrote in message
news:48161e55$1@linux...
>
> What is the best MB for this processor with Paris??
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey Aaron, My MOBO is Socket 478 P4. I don't think it will take a Xeon,
> or
>>will it?
>>
>>Here are the specs again:
>> http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=648F_Neo -L
>>
>>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>> http://www.mwave.com/mwave/skuinc.hmx?sku=ba24819&promo= MP
>>>
>>>Intel XEON SL72G 3.06 Ghz Processor w/1MB Cache
>>>$50 Clearance Discount!
>>>Your Price: $19.95
>>>
>>>Technical Information:
>>>
>>>a.. sSpec Number: SL72G
>>>a.. CPU Speed: 3.06 GHz
>>>a.. PCG:
>>>a.. Bus Speed: 533 MHz
>>>a.. Bus/Core Ratio: 23
>>>a.. L3 Cache Size: 1 MB
>>>a.. L3 Cache Speed: 3.06
>>>a.. GHz Package Type: Micro-FCPGA
>>>a.. Manufacturing Technology: 0.13 micron
>>>a.. Core Stepping: M0
>>>a.. CPUID String: 0F25h
>>>a.. Thermal Design Power: 87W
>>>a.. Thermal Specification: 70°C
>>>a.. VID Voltage Range: 1.525V
>>>
>>>with repetitive algos like audio plugs use, the extra cache could be a
> big
>>
>>>deal for ya. Just make sure you have the right socket for it and mobo
>>>support.
>>>
>>>
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>
>I've had the same problems with my Inspiron 8000/8100 stuff in the past.
Changing power supplies made zero difference. However, lifting the power
adapter ground pin got about 75% of it. Safe? Not really, but it makes it
almost managable. A Ebtech Hum Eliminator oughta catch the rest but I've
long since moved on so I never tried it. YMMV, FYI.
AA
"Wayne Carson" <waynecarson@cox.net> wrote in message news:48165ff8@linux...
> Hey "T",
>
> I use a Dell Inspiron 6000. I won't recommend it because when the pwr
> supply is plug'd in I hear noise from poor grounding. I think it's a Dell
> problem. The only way to get rid of the noise is to unplug the pwr cord
> and run on batteries or, I've got a 2' wire with alligator clips on both
> sides and I manually ground the laptop to my mackie board or pwr amp or
> any bare steel.
>
> 2. Even though I only use the laptop to create and edit midi sequences
> (to later dump into Paris), I do still record rough audio (vox and
> acoustic gtr) to it via M-audio MobilePre USB 2.0 so that it's easier for
> me to build the midi sequences. The mobile pre is 2 in and 2 out with
> headphone. In other words, I find a simple midi drum loop, loop it for 4
> minutes, play the acoustic and sing and then I begin building the
> sequences.
>
> I tried the mobile pre by itself but I didn't like the direct monitor
> function. This would have been ideal, (the mobilepre fit in the laptop
> case) but as you will see, I now have to haul around a mini mixer also.
>
> I just use Sonar Cakewalk Home Studio and the efx's only work on playback
> so while singing a rough take onto or into a midi sequence project, I have
> no reverb. Blah! So, what I have done for my portable rig is run the mic
> and acoustic into my CFX12 mackie with built in digital efx. I route
> channel 5 (vox) out of aux 1 and channel 6 (
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Latency Checker [message #95867 is a reply to message #95856] |
Mon, 11 February 2008 12:50 |
Ed
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>> long since moved on so I never tried it. YMMV, FYI.
>>
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "Wayne Carson" <waynecarson@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:48165ff8@linux...
>>> Hey "T",
>>>
>>> I use a Dell Inspiron 6000. I won't recommend it because when the pwr
>>> supply is plug'd in I hear noise from poor grounding. I think it's a
>>> Dell problem. The only way to get rid of the noise is to unplug the pwr
>>> cord and run on batteries or, I've got a 2' wire with alligator clips
>>> on both sides and I manually ground the laptop to my mackie board or pwr
>>> amp or any bare steel.
>>>
>>> 2. Even though I only use the laptop to create and edit midi sequences
>>> (to later dump into Paris), I do still record rough audio (vox and
>>> acoustic gtr) to it via M-audio MobilePre USB 2.0 so that it's easier
>>> for me to build the midi sequences. The mobile pre is 2 in and 2 out
>>> with headphone. In other words, I find a simple midi drum loop, loop it
>>> for 4 minutes, play the acoustic and sing and then I begin building the
>>> sequences.
>>>
>>> I tried the mobile pre by itself but I didn't like the direct monitor
>>> function. This would have been ideal, (the mobilepre fit in the laptop
>>> case) but as you will see, I now have to haul around a mini mixer also.
>>>
>>> I just use Sonar Cakewalk Home Studio and the efx's only work on
>>> playback so while singing a rough take onto or into a midi sequence
>>> project, I have no reverb. Blah! So, what I have done for my portable
>>> rig is run the mic and acoustic into my CFX12 mackie with built in
>>> digital efx. I route channel 5 (vox) out of aux 1 and channel 6
>>> (acoustic) out aux 2 to the mobile pre and via USB into the laptop
>>> Cakewalk project. I mute these two tracks in the project while
>>> recording. The aux sends are dry signals for recording.
>>>
>>> While I'm recording, the project is playing back the drum loops or bass
>>> lines or whatever keyboard parts are on the sequence. The mobilepre
>>> grabs the laptop audio via the USB and sends it to my mackie channel 1
>>> and 2 (L/R). So I listen to L/R playback and I let the acoustic and vox
>>> signal continue down thru the mackie channels and into the mains. The
>>> mains now contain the project L/R playback and my vocal and acoustic
>>> signals with the efx's placed on the mains so I have some or a lot of
>>> reverb as I'm tracking. I listen via headphone output which is the mains
>>> signal out with efx's.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Chris Ludwig
>
> ADK Pro Audio
> (859) 635-5762
> www.adkproaudio.com
> chrisl@adkproaudio.comI've asked about this but it was ages ago and I'm curious to check in again.
when I upgraded to v.3.9 of the UAD-1 Powered Plugins I began having problems
with clicks, pops and occasional loud (REALLY LOUD!) hooting noises that
scared my clients and me half to death. I tried to go back to v.3.7 but
could not. UA tech support was useless - they no longer support Mac OS 9
and no one seemed interested in even trying to help. So, I've pretty much
quit using the UAD-1 FX w/ Paris. Is anyone else running Paris on a Mac
w/ UAD-1 v.3.9?
GanttCrap, I recomended (a couple months ago) Norton Ghost to a friend. :-(
I use Ghost 2003
Rod
Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>Hi Aaron,
>The new Norton Ghost sucks balls! :)
>Acronis True Image 11 is excellent as well as Paragon drive back up.
>Paragon is probably a bit to techie for most folks though.
>
>Chris
>
>
>Aaron Allen wrote:
>> I use SP1 w/o any troubles. I didn't see anything of real value to a DAW
>> in SP2. However, my machine will not ever be an internet machine. Keep
>> it lean, clean and focused on DAW duties.
>>
>> What I meant by PCI slots is what spec...... 2.1, 2.2, 2.3?
>>
>> I would definitely dump the Kingston. Get whatever the manufacturer said
>> to get for that model. If you can't find what they spec'd anymore go to
>> www.crucial.com <http://www.crucial.com> and get what they say to get
>> < http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=MS-6585%20 V5.0%20%28648F%20Neo%29>.
>
>> Get a matched pair of 512's, they're cheaper than yard dirt these days,
>> and a GB is plenty to run ParisXP. www.musicxp.net
>> <http://www.musicxp.net> will have some good optimization tips, also.
>>
>> An antec 400 is 'probably' good for 2, maybe 3 EDS cards. No more IMO,
>> of course depending on what other stuff you have on it. As you add more
>> hard drives and CD/DVD drives, be aware of power drain. FWIW, Brian T
>> didn't even had a optical CD/DVD drive in his DAW. He fed out via
>> removable FW drives. Extras create extra possible headaches. Get it
>> built as a solid system, then you can add stuff. Be methodical, move
>> slowly and you'll be a heck of a lot less likely to pull your hair out
>> chasing any ghosts.
>>
>> Now, you are going to use a separate audio drive, right? (grandfatherly
>> voice)
>> Memory writes, caching and the such make recording to the OS drive
>> generally a bad idea, no matter who's OS.
>>
>> Oh, you didn't say but if that's not an nVidia video card, I'd dump it
>> based on my past experiences. Get at minimum 64 MB vid ram per screen
>> output, more if you can. Paris loves it some nVidia/GeForce. Don't load
>> a bunch of video card/gaming crapware, keep it simple 'n' clean. Native
>> XP drivers if they exist. Try TXmicro.com or something similar for
>> surplus cards, again priced like dirt these days for AGP but soon you
>> won't be able to find those vintage parts.
>>
>> Buy Norton Ghost, or Acronis True Image. Use it. Believe me now or
>> believe me later on that.
>>
>> AA
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Latency Checker [message #95877 is a reply to message #95863] |
Tue, 12 February 2008 04:44 |
Ed
Messages: 199
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
x..." target="_blank">1@linux...
>>
>> I was reading some tech info on the UAD websight last night and =
noticed
>> this.
>> "Matrox G4xx graphics cards users will experience distortion in =
Audio
>> Export/Processing
>> results if UAD plugin windows are open during processing.
>> Workaround: Close all UAD plugin interface windows before =
performing Audio
>> Export/Processing."
>>
>> I've been using a Matrox G450 forever, and don't notice distortion, =
but
>> there
>> are the usual clicks and occasional dropouts when using a UAD plug =
on
a=20
>> track
>> with edits. (yes, I'm using the drivers from windows, not the crap =
ones
>> from
>> matarox) I render the track, solve the problem. I was wondering =
though
if
>> it might be a good idea to switch to a different vid card to see if =
that
>> fixed the problem. If so what would you suggest?
>> I'm still run
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 07 04:34:27 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11959 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
