|
|
| Re: Quick and dirty guitar production for $99.00! [message #79955 is a reply to message #79951] |
Mon, 12 February 2007 13:51   |
excelav
 Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ards or firewire but that looks like a $1500+
> proposition
> and with very little utility outside of tracking this band. Right now I'm
> leaning toward a Scope Home card (ballpark $500) and an A16 (again,
> ballpark
> $800). Also, being me, I'd probably just get a Scope Pro card with all the
> extra DSP and the Z-link I/O options, but I've sunk enough money into this
> project that even I'm starting to balk at writing $2k checks.
>
> So, to make a short story very long, are there other options for getting
> 16 really good line level converters into a computer for recording a a
> full
> drum kit? And this has to be a no hassle, works all the time, we don't
> wind
> up pushing tracks around a couple of samples to compensate for different
> latency from different hardware.
>
> And yes, one option would be another PARIS system for tracking, and then
> I would fly the tracks over to my SX rig via ADAT, which I've been
> thinking
> about doing, but I'm willing to hear suggestions from anyone.
>
> Thanks,
>
> TCBFor $200? yup, have 2 of them and they're still working as they should. They
don't have a ton of gain though, so I wouldn't get anywhere near them with a
ribbon/weak output mic.... however, I use
|
|
|
|
| Re: Quick and dirty guitar production for $99.00! [message #79958 is a reply to message #79955] |
Mon, 12 February 2007 15:14   |
LaMont
Messages: 828 Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
an 'aggregate' device in
>> OS
>> X) yields different latencies that would cause pretty massive comb
>> filtering
>> problems doing drums.
>>
>> Sadly, being a complete moron when I bought my Creamware card I didn't
>> get
>> the Z-link version, which would allow me to get 16 channels of pretty
>> decent
>> line level converters for less than a grand. Alternately, I could go the
>> RME route with PCI cards or firewire but that looks like a $1500+
>> proposition
>> and with very little utility outside of tracking this band. Right now I'm
>> leaning toward a Scope Home card (ballpark $500) and an A16 (again,
>> ballpark
>> $800). Also, being me, I'd probably just get a Scope Pro card with all
>> the
>> extra DSP and the Z-link I/O options, but I've sunk enough money into
>> this
>> project that even I'm starting to balk at writing $2k checks.
>>
>> So, to make a short story very long, are there other options for getting
>> 16 really good line level converters into a computer for recording a a
>> full
>> drum kit? And this has to be a no hassle, works all the time, we don't
>> wind
>> up pushing tracks around a couple of samples to compensate for different
>> latency from different hardware.
>>
>> And yes, one option would be another PARIS system for tracking, and then
>> I would fly the tracks over to my SX rig via ADAT, which I've been
>> thinking
>> about doing, but I'm willing to hear suggestions from anyone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> TCB
>
>Hi,
On the zip I uploaded is there any OS9 version ?
If not then I guess it has not one...
I have heard though that jack is a
|
|
|
|
| Re: Quick and dirty guitar production for $99.00! [message #79959 is a reply to message #79958] |
Mon, 12 February 2007 15:34  |
excelav
 Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
similar mac plugin , do a search as I
don't have any mac, never had, so maybe you can experiment with it.
Anyway why don't you get a cheap old 200$ PC that can run your Paris rig
?
This will be a wiser choice ,I guess...
Regards,
Dimitrios
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenetNOSPAM.gr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>Senderella version 1.08 is macos too..
>>I am uploading for all of you
>>
>
>Hi Dimitrios! Thank you for all your efforts. I was able to find a Mac
>OSX version. Unfortunately, Paris will only run on Mac OS 9. Is there
a
>Mac OS 9 version?
>
>Thanks
>James
>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Gene, how are you using Senderella? I have not found a Mac O/S 9 version.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@NOSPotenet.@.gr" target="_blank">>@.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I will need your input here with you trying it too because I feel bored
>>>>being
>>>>>alone on this ride !
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>Dimitrios
>>>>
>>>>Dimitrios,
>>>>I have been following this closely. I still use Paris during mixing primarily
>>>>as a mix only bus, but between FaderWorks and Senderella, I may have
to
>>>reconsider
>>>>Paris as a primary mix DAW.
>>>>I will be out of state for the next two weeks, but when I get back I
will
>>>>jump in and help with some tests.
>>>>Gen
|
|
|
|