| Day from Hell...sort of [message #79289] |
Tue, 30 January 2007 20:26  |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
tp://www.cdsg.com/
>>>
>>>they are the best in the biz IMO.
>>>
>>>DC
>>>
>>>
>>>"Louis Guarino Jr." <kateeba@snet.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Neil You are right on the money. That's the way I figure it too.
>
>>>>
>>>>I suppose I could burn them, but I really don't want to. I want them
>pressed,
>>>>with the superior artwork, barcode, shrinkwrap, etc. I want the radio
>>>stations
>>>>and reviewers to take this seriously, even if I might not sell a lot
of
>>>them.
>>>> The quality that I put into the music has to extend to the whole artisic
>>>>package. I even design them myself, including the cover paintings.
>>>>
>>>>You never know. I could always have more made if I needed to.
>>>>
>>>>Lou
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Lou,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The economics of scale for manufactured CD's don't work well
>>>>>>until you make 1000. I've got a great outfit, but they will
>>>>>>tell you that 500 cost almost as much as 1000, and 300 is
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Day from Hell...sort of [message #79293 is a reply to message #79289] |
Tue, 30 January 2007 21:50  |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>>>>sold for an avg. of $10 each).
>>>>>***$1,000 profit, 50 promo copies, no drink coasters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Lou knows how much he can realistically expect to sell within
>>>>>a reasonable amount of time, based on his last CD's sales,
>>>>>otherwise he wouldn't be asking about the number 300.
>>>>>
>>>>>Neil
>>>>
>>>
>>
>http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=10540
check the monochord sample
:o)Kinda sparkly/dirty - I'd be interested in hearing the Pacifica
on voice with a really smooth mic (like a -47 or something
along those lines).
Not a good pre for bright mics, I would imagine.
Neil
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=10540
>
>check the monochord sample
>
>:o)
>
>Is it perhaps because the bistream rate of the file/individual
channel itself (probably 16 or 24, right?) is lower than that
of the SX mix buss? Could that be why it sounds different?
Neil
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>both stereo.
>
>
>
>On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:17:47 -0600, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Was the channel mono? I don't remember how N2 handled it but SX2 may not
be
>>sending stereo to Amplitube when inserted on a channel.
>>
>>I've never heard a plugin sound any different on a channel vs. the main
bus
>>in N3/C4 - stereo works fine there as long as the source is stereo.
>>
>>If you mono audio on a stereo track, you can get a mono input to some
>>plugins, which is solved by sending to a stereo effect instead.
>>
>>There are some amp sim comps that simply pass the right channel and only
>>process the left, making it only possible to use a mono track. Don't know
>>about Amplitube.
&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Day from Hell...sort of [message #79300 is a reply to message #79293] |
Tue, 30 January 2007 23:14 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ailto:dc@spammersinhell.com" target="_blank">dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Doug Wellington" <doug@parisfaqs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, it seems obvious that Don does not have first hand knowledge of the
>>
>>>subject.
>>
>>Wrong. You have no idea.
>>
>>
>>>(Not that I would wish that for anyone...) And yet, shouldn't we
>>>take this opportunity to treat him as the un-knowing child-like spirit
>that
>>
>>>he is and to help him learn the truth?
>>
>>Doug.. really... You really have no clue here.
>>
>>Okay, both you and Thad need to read this book:
>>
>>http://www.depressionisachoice.com/
>>
>>and the new one Brainswitch. She is getting quite startling
>>results. It is something you both need to be aware of before
>>you apply such silly little characterizations to anyone...
>>
>>Until you read it, the ignorance is not mine.
>>
>>
>>>a chance exists that we can help Don understand that his opinion of his
>>
>>>perception of the one true reality might not be the same as yours or mine
>>
>>>is,
>>
>>Oh, that is a given here, and never in doubt. We will stipulate
>>to different perceptions.
>>
>>
>>
>>>and to realize that each one is as valid as the other...)
>>
>>If this is true, then neither is valid, since there is no objective
>>reality and both are therefore delusions.
>>
>>But, both are actually truth claims. As such, at least one is
>>wrong. Thad certainly thinks mine is wrong. See, that is the
>>thing about atheists. Many of them are diehard modernists
>>and are quite certain that there is an objective reality and they
>>know it, at least the part about a deity...
>>Different realities, based upon subjective perception,
>>is a postmodern conceit to them, as it is to me. Thad
>>claims that there is no objective basis upon which to believe
>>in God. You believe that there is no objectivity, other than
>>one that we have no apparent access to. There really is no
>>common ground here. It is quite best if we all talk about
>>something else at this point.
>>
>>
>>
>>>DC wrote:
>>>> These are lies. Paul was the great liberator of women,
>>
>>>Interesting that Mohammed was also considered the great liberator of wo
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
