The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Scam!

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Scam! [message #64880]

Thu, 23 February 2006 21:10

John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

>>"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:44301382$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Been thinking about picking up a new guitar processor (or
>>> perhaps even a new amp, just for some different tones & colors,
>>> and MAN there's so much stuff out there! Haven't been shopping
>>> for anything like this in awhile, so I was wondering if anyone
>>> has any items of this nature that they've found they really
>>> like?
>>>
>>> Not looking f

Report message to a moderator

Re: Scam! [message #64884 is a reply to message #64880]

Thu, 23 February 2006 21:59

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

e if you're using anything higher than v1.xx (IIRC -
> version 2 was the one they started being able to have latency
> compensation in the group channels). The TotalMix software
> takes care of this upfront during any kind of input phase
> (whether it's reacording/rolling, or monitoring while it's
> standing still, and then during playback, it's SX that does it.
>
> One question though, is it making any difference if you have a
> channel in "monitor" mode - meaning the channel selected & the
> monitor button pressed vs. not pressed? Just wondering if that
> makes any difference in latency your situation.
>
> Neil
>I see... I guess that's prolly because you're not actually
monitoring anything through your RME interface via TotalMix?
All the monitoring happens through Paris in your rig?

Neil

"DJ" <

Report message to a moderator

Re: Scam! [message #64889 is a reply to message #64884]

Fri, 24 February 2006 00:24

Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005

Senior Member

"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I found an old (and discontinued, of course) box called an Underscore
>Electronics ISObrick. It already had 8 steel core tranny in it. These were
>subsequently ID'ed as being similar to the current Cinemag CMOB-2S. I had
4
>of them replaced with Jensen JT 11's. Turns out that Jensen knew the owner
>of Underscore and when he got sick and had to close his business, Jensen
>sort of picked up on servicing his stuff . I got a very good deal fromn
>Jensen on this. The steel core trannies have an aggressive flavor to them.
>
>
>
>Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:442fb340$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> Ugg not enough coffee around here for me to get my head around that!
>>
>> Seriously though, DJ who modded yer RNC?
>>
>> Also, havwe you lookeds at the Purple Audio MC77? Or an 1176 reissue
>(Which
>> I hear are pretty good)
>>
>>
>>
>> "DJ&q

Report message to a moderator

Re: Scam! [message #64896 is a reply to message #64880]

Fri, 24 February 2006 04:12

John [1]

Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

> accurately....effectively providing plugin delay compensation of
> >UAD-1
> >> >> > plugins in Paris.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Since it didn't work a year ago, I'm wondering why it's working
now.
> >> >Maybe
> >> >> > it has something to do with leaving the ASIIO direct monitoring
> >enabled
> >> >in
> >> >> > Totalmix, but not in SX......or maybe it was just a bug in the SX
> >PDC.
> >> >I'm
> >> >> > going to play around with this some more, but it sure is cool to
> be
> >> able
> >> >> to
> >> >> > insert a Pultec and an 1176 on a drum track that is being streamed
> >from
> >> >> > Paris. It will also (theo

Report message to a moderator

Re: Scam! [message #64897 is a reply to message #64889]

Fri, 24 February 2006 04:14

John [1]

Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

retically) be possible to bus an entire
> >Paris
> >> >> drum
> >> >> > submix to soimething like a stereo Fairchild and return it to a
> >stereo
> >> >> pair
> >> >> > of Paris tracks.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This would be a nice way to keep the mix in Paris, but to still
> >process
> >> >> > certain tracks with UAD processors if needed.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hmmmm.........
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:442f665c@linux...
> >> >> > > I've been A/B'ing some mixes here, comparing the sonics of
flying
> >> the
> >> >> > tracks
> >> >> > > across the digital matrix from Cubase SX to Paris and having a
> >bunch
> >> >of
> >> >> > > UAD-1 plugins inserted as opposed to inserting analogue gear
into
> >> a
> >> >> > straight
> >> >> > > Paris mix. I'm definitely leaning toward the Paris/analogue mix.
> >Even
> >> >> with
> >> >> > > all of the processing power available and having the Paris
summing
> >> >bus,
&

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Best translator for Mac to PC files?
Next Topic:	EDS 1000 price?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Aug 07 15:55:57 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01565 seconds