Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: this is only a test . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: this is only a test . . . [message #91076 is a reply to message #91057] |
Sat, 06 October 2007 13:16   |
Erling
Messages: 156
Registered: October 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sincerely,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Neil" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:OIUOIU@OIU.com">OIUOIU@OIU.com</A>> wrote=20
in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:471d8a6e$1@linux">news:471d8a6e$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>1.) =
My=20
finger surgery is tommorrow, and although this is - as I<BR>am =
continuing to=20
try to remember - a VERY minor thing in the<BR>grand scheme of my body =
&=20
overall health, it's still traumatic<BR>mentally, because I don't know =
how=20
much flesh I'll have left.<BR>Doc says that he thinks the location =
&=20
extent of it makes me a<BR>good candidate for that Mohs' surgery I =
mentioned=20
before, but<BR>it's pretty deep - and he can't guarantee how it will=20
heal/how<BR>much will regenerate. Really, this is probably nothing,=20
and<BR>people have played better than I can play with much=20
greater<BR>impediments - I think I am so nervous about it =
because<BR>honestly,=20
so much of what I do is at the edge of my abilities<BR>anyway, I think =
if I=20
lose any technical abilities at all, it's<BR>going to just throw me =
back into=20
not even being able to execute<BR>anywhere near whatever level that =
I've=20
managed to play at thus<BR>far. Which brings me to random thought=20
#2...<BR><BR>2.) So in a slightly nostalgic (will I be able to play=20
half-ass<BR>decent again?) mode due to #1 , I broke out some things =
that=20
I<BR>had done in the past - stupid, right? lol =
Anyway, I=20
hadn't<BR>heard this stuff in a LONG time - some years, actually, and =
a<BR>few=20
things oc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: this is only a test . . . Even More OT: Macle? [message #91083 is a reply to message #91066] |
Sat, 06 October 2007 15:05 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
into the white house again she'll so train wreck us we may not recover
>>> from it, ever.
>>> I'm not opposed to a woman in the white house in the slightest, but God
>>> help us all if her broom gets parked out on the lawn.
>>>
>>> http://youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=bz303
>>>
>>> AA
>>>
>>
>> The era of Hilbilly is fast approaching. It ain't gonna' be pretty. She's
>> as smart as she is diabolical.
>>
>>
>>> "Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:471ec45e@linux...
>>>> Rudi Giuliani's push to save America........
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, couldn't resist.
>>>> Rich
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>a refreshing sentiment in today's world, cudos to you.
On 24 Oct 2007 00:25:13 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>glad you and your daughter are fine. that's why i make our daughter
>>(40) take her own car when we go out.
>
>thanks...
>
>Today I go get the appraisals...
>
>endless BS... But hey, I did it. We have a rule here.
>
>You fugg it, you fix it.. I fugged it.
>
>DC
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 23 Oct 2007 09:48:07 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Sooo, I am picking up
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: this is only a test . . . Even More OT: Macle? [message #91093 is a reply to message #91083] |
Sat, 06 October 2007 20:54 |
steve the artguy
Messages: 308
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
0
Nothing about audio connections</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>or any of that. I'm too =
tired to=20
remember but</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> will post it=20
tomorrow.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_013E_01C815FD.6DE40B70--Funny, but I can't help picturing Ron Paul behind giving them both a shove
onto the tracks.
S
"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:471ec45e@linux...
> Rudi Giuliani's push to save America........
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist.
> Rich
>
>
>
>Yechh, that's pretty disgusting. Well, I've said before I don't trust
Hillary, so perhaps my intuition will be validated. Not that I'm happy about
that prospect, but . . . the truth is the truth.
I'm just so tired of government of the people, by the rich, for the rich.
If money keeps people above the law then there is no law, just the haves vs
the have-nots.
So, how does this change? I mean seriously . . . anybody? How does it
change?
Sincerely,
Pessimistic in Portland
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:471ed2be@linux...
> I'm really starting to like Rudi..... try this one out for size. Sorry to
> rant about political stuff, but if we let this crazed crooked b**ch into
> the white house again she'll so train wreck us we may not recover from it,
> ever.
> I'm not opposed to a woman in the white house in the slightest, but God
> help us all if her broom gets parked out on the lawn.
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=bz303
>
> AA
>
>
> "Rich Lamanna" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: this is only a test . . . Even More OT: Macle? [message #91099 is a reply to message #91083] |
Sun, 07 October 2007 01:19 |
Erling
Messages: 156
Registered: October 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
for the
> next earth-shaking/mind-blowing one. But I don't think it's
> ever going to happen again - not in the popular realm, anyway,
> and that's the sad part. The fringes are of no import in this
> regard - and I say this as a guy who's always been on the
> fringes, both in terms of success AND preferred genre;
> there's always been good stuff on the fringes.... but what kind
> of impact would the Mona Lisa have had if the only people who
> ever saw it were DaVinci & the girl who's picture he painted?
> Think about that one...
>
>
> OK, rant's off... i'll be back when I can type again - in the
> meanwhile, I'd love to read your thoughts on all this.
>
> CARRY ON!
>
> :)
>
> NeilSarah, it doesn't change, it's more of the same. You see how pathetic the
Dems have been in congress. They are both the same problem. Repubs and Dems
are both the same party, the big business party.I would help him.If you guys have not tried these out please do, amazing maximizer, eq an
punch effects. These guys have really great ears.Dude, thanks for cheering me up. I was startin' t' get bummed there. :)
S
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:471f3635$1@linux...
>
> Sarah, it doesn't change, it's more of the same. You see how pathetic
> the
> Dems have been in congress. They are both the same problem. Repubs and
> Dems
> are both the same party, the big business party.Hi Rod,
I'm pretty sure this happens because there aren't enough CPU resources.
If you have hyperthreading turned off, I've been using a dual core fix for
a couple of months now with no issues. We could try turning hyperthreading
on and using the fix to see if that solves the crackle.
Good luck!
Mike
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Well...I had to go out of town for a couple days and since I've got back
I've
>been trouoble shooting the problem I posted about last week.
>I've definatly got it narrowed down to the UAD plugs. Now I think it may
>be a bad UAD card. Not sure yet, still more tests to do tommorrow. It's
either
>a software rev. mismatch with Paris, or a card. I ghosted my system back
>to the 4.6 UAD version and I still get clicks and pops. I think I have a
>4.5 version ghosted. going to try that tommorrow. If it still has the pops,
>I'll start pulling cards. Got 3 of em.
>When I get rid of the UAD plugs the pops go away.
>No, I'm not driving
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: this is only a test . . . [message #91128 is a reply to message #91124] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 01:55 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;our guy".
>
>This was earlier in the culture war, when the left
>was willing to occasionaly be honest about one of their own.
>Those days are gone, and now the Bill Maher crowd wants to
>make this all about BJ's and Mr. Zigzag so they can pretend
>that Bill's very nature did not cause huge problems in the
>world as it did in his own household.
>
>But we know it did. We know that OBL seized upon the lack of
>resolve, wisdom and discipline Bill showed in Somalia as
>evidence that we are not to be feared and that error and many,
>many others helped bring about 911.
>
>These things are the result of having a leader with no moral
>center. It's not about doing bad things, it's about being
>a bad guy.
>
>Remember during the Lewiniski biz, when Bill got several
>"spiritual advisors" to help him through his troubles?
>
>One of them was Tony Campolo. Tony is a bigtime lefty
>Christian who I heard actually say "you don't give a shit" in
>the pulpit when speaking of helping the poor. Tony cannot be
>purchased or influence by politics. He is also the friend of a
>good friend of mine.
>
>Know why Tony dropped out of the "spiritual advisor" group
>after a couple weeks? (and yes this is insider info) Because
>Bill is a phony and likely a damn sociopath and has NO intention
>of ever changing anything other than his lines; for more effective
>ones. Other pastors stayed in, and later called in their favors
>and got Bill to speak at their megachurch. At which point I
>lost all respect for them. Tony walked. He walked because
>Bill is scum. But we knew that.
>
>So now, it ain't resentment cuz he got to do fun/naughty stuff.
>Not even close...
>
>DC
>OK, Deej, I think I get your point. We disagree on the timeline (it's extent
mostly) on the terrorism/energy stuff. But I get your point.
TCB
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471f602a$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey Deej,
>>
>> You can respond off list if you like, but I've never been able to
>> understand
>> the vitriol that some types of conservatives (remember, I consider myself
>> a conservative) for the Clintons. I eventually figured it out with Bill,
>> I think it was personal. So many 'social conservatives' spend their lives
>> doing what they're supposed to do, staying out of trouble, denying
>> themselves
>> things they would like to enjoy, all in the belief that it's the right
>> thing
>> to do for themsel
|
|
|
|
| Re: this is only a test . . . [message #91137 is a reply to message #91100] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 07:38 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
onomy propped up
> on the fantasy that OPEC would be "our buddies".
>
>> However, Hillary seems to me to be deeply, deeply vanilla. She was rabidly
>> pro Iraq war, is saber rattling against Iran and Syria, wants to expand
>> NATO
>> to Russia's doorstep, is probably the most pro-Israel candidate
>> imaginable,
>> and more than any other leading Democrat appears like she might actually
>> be a teensy bit Christian. Not a Bible thumper of course, but her
>> occasional
>> statements about god and family sound at least potentially sincere. So,
>> and
>> I'm asking this sincerely, why is she diabolical? Not annoying (she is),
>> power hungry (comes with wanting the job), unwilling to answer questions
>> straight (so are they all), or maybe a dyke (who cares). But what is
>> diabolical
>> about here, and what will she DO if elected that is so awful and radical
>> and dangerous?
>
> ..........I get your point. I just don't trust her because she was 1/2 of
> the disaster that was Bilary. She's the epitome of a calculating
> opportunist.......which, come to think of it, may be exactly what we might
> need as
|
|
|
|
| Re: this is only a test . . . [message #91138 is a reply to message #91112] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 07:40 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Secretary of State, or Secretary of War.......but at the same time,
> there something very Talleyrand'esque about both Bilary/Hilbilly which, in
> the end, serves their personal interests at the expense of the national
> interest. Just look at how popular Bill Clinton is after the incredible
> damage (by omission and incompetence, if nothing else) he did to our
> national security by allowing the situation in Iraq to fester under the
> watchful eye of the UN. I think that the enduring "cult of Bill", says more
> about the idiocy of the American public than it does about the Clinton's
> though. The Clinton's, being smartn'all, recognize it and feed off it like
> catfish in a pond full of blood bait.
>
>> Lastly, I've been telling my lefty academic friends for years that they're
>> going to find religion at some point about states rights. From gay
>> marriage
>> to medical pot nearly every pet issue for lefties will get squashed by
>> federal
>> lawmakers and the federal judiciary. The lefties are going to have to
>> fight
>> for the right of (their own) states to legislate on those issues. They
>> scream
>> and yell and hem and haw and tell me I'm nuts but they have yet to come up
>> with a compelling argument to counter mine. Conservatives (not the ones
>> like
>> me, the other kinds) are going to get their comeuppance probably after the
>> next election for executive power. Seems like a great idea to decide the
>> president is above the law when you're guy is president, but the history
>> of this country is the gradual erosion of judicial and legislative power,
>> i.e. the executive branch rarely gives anything back. I suspect any
>> Democrat
>> who runs against any of the current Republicans will win, and then all of
>> that executive power wrenched away from Congress will be in the hands of
>> the other party. Law of unintended consequences, but I for one will have
>> a hearty belly laugh when the Rush Limbaugh set starts howling about some
>> abuse of executive power when a Democrat is the abuser.
>>
>> Anyway, enlighten me about Hillary.
>
> I think those who are howling about how Bush
> ignores/circumvents/reinterprets the law are going to be in for more of the
> same old same old, but it's going to be less about a national
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: this is only a test . . . [message #91160 is a reply to message #91138] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 15:44 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>I think what is happening is that the PCI bus is tying up the 1 cpu and
samples
>are overflowing a buffer and not making it to disk. With a second CPU.
it
>may be enough to keep things moving smoothly. We'll just have to try it.
>
>All the best,
>
>Mike
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Yeah, I'll take you up on that. So you think by turning hyperthreading
on,
>>and usuing your dual core fix, which will fix the hyperthreading issue,
>it
>>will fix the problem?
>>Just to give you a little more info. I just tried a bounce to disk of a
>mix
>>that only contained 1 track of UAD plugs..Uad Fairchild and Cambridge.
I
>>still got clicks and pops (about 6 total). when I get rid of all the UAD
>>plugs there are no clicks or pops.
>>I have 3 UAD cards.
>>I'd be willing to give it a try. Thanks
>>Rod
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Rod,
>>>
>>>I'm pretty sure this happens because there aren't enough CPU resources.
>>
>>>If you have hyperthreading turned off, I've been using a dual core fix
>for
>>>a couple of months now with no issues. We could try turning hyperthreading
>>>on and using the fix to see if that solves the crackle.
>>>
>>>Good luck!
>>>
>>>Mike
>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Well...I had to go out of town for a couple days and since I've got back
>>>I've
>>>>been trouoble shooting the problem I posted about last week.
>>>>I've definatly got it narrowed down to the UAD plugs. Now I think it
may
>>>>be a bad UAD card. Not sure yet, still more tests to do tommorrow. It's
>>>either
>>>>a software rev. mismatch with Paris, or a card. I ghosted my system back
>>>>to the 4.6 UAD version and I still get clicks and pops. I think I have
>>a
>>>>4.5 version ghosted. going to try that tommorrow. If it still has the
>pops,
>>>>I'll start pulling cards. Got 3 of em.
>>>>When I get rid of the UAD plugs the pops go away.
>>>>No, I'm not driving the plugs too hard. :-)
>>>>No overs anywhere. I set up an incrediably safe mix for testing this.
>>>>Rod
>>>
>>
>
---=_linux471ff903
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="BOO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: this is only a test . . . [message #91295 is a reply to message #91281] |
Thu, 11 October 2007 07:45 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e.
Thanks for all the help you guys.
Tom
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:47201cc6$1@linux...
Had a minimal session today. Paris performed but there =
are kooky
things going on. I'll post the error messages as soon as =
I get down there=20
again tonight.
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:471f77cc@linux...
Also it's not retaining the Configuration on the C-16 =
Pro settings.
Odd Tom
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:471f0f51$1@linux...
Clean install or so I thought. Three cards, 3 C16s, 1 =
442.
SPDIF isn't outputting signal
2 of the 3 C-16s send now line to middle of song when =
double striking rewind.
No audio from card B except solo bus.
At start up messages read missing stuff. Nothing =
about audio connections
or any of that. I'm too tired to remember but will =
post it tomorrow.
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C81767.504D6960
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
&l
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 06 16:36:39 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.25426 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
