Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » What replaces No Limit?
| What replaces No Limit? [message #82964] |
Wed, 11 April 2007 16:42  |
![brandon[2] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "brandon[2] is currently offline")
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
MfmdfGpV4ygpOajts0tH9pp/wCJa9dNVmOa YfDwqOPLzWTsnJpt
yvZPZ+jXWx+b9v4n07xdrfieQwXUg1GGVbe5t5wvm3MyorpIzq2VEZUbB/e+ XGXNP8J/Em5tX8NW
UV3pOrCEyRtps1xsBlDLCpUbgY2OxQXZd3TIGVYeTSRx+GbX+z9Xmv7KDU4I 7vR7iCcnZHKyMfOw
WwzRSYzjqD6Ve8WadpSRaf4nXSIIRKS0cln8sOSg3fLJhxncM7cnBGTycfUy oueHqUHHlna14uVl
azdpK6Vt+rfc+EqZPSqxVWpCN9H1T12srH0HC1pJZfEe8tb/AEvRnuWYWK38 0jTKVhIkSOVwShcg
fMAeQxDEsXO7pdz8R9O+FmjWf24S6Rb3M8j2k80M8csccLGQRxsykk4dQxxw enHHlFlBb+ItHSO6
8QNPM8dtbNeEyGMPGyofP3DiRQ0jspBDeXIByFFdLofh3VY/hRqDy+IbnW5E vlY2MU8QkmQxup2s
AXQAsBuAU5RgM4bHj59lNaq048j5IJqpKV5Nq2icrbaWitLO/L3+sy3C04xk 6MXzafastVbsvl03
M/UPFvjRrTw/cJ8PNIttMU2osnawLeW4jLqLoBsycQ8gkBsBRmuw+MfiKCfx nonh3VdPlXSxp4ni
aAAlmkhJQ5kJVAsuwsWRMBnGSSNvH2+na/oq+H57nUZPCuk2Myagbi+k2x2x 2qyuzlgzqoTeUYhd
gBH3nB/QkeGfhT8YfiBJYeO5dS0/XUsLaGxv9QuCkGpSPOIFRciN0kMUxZj0 I7tkE/H8YU4VqeGx
GFw8p01y81rczbvdrlsuVXulq0nv1PSqYjmw86dWpyytazalaPlZXj9+h8x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What replaces No Limit? [message #83027 is a reply to message #82992] |
Thu, 12 April 2007 23:51  |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Regards,
>>Dedric
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:463f588f@linux...
>>>I always wonder what people will be like when I have been talking to them
>
>>>on the net and then I am finally going to meet them. These thoughts were
>
>>>sorta' in the back of my mind as I was driving up there Thursday. As it
>
>>>turned out, I don't think I could have imagined a better bunch of folks.
> It
>>>was great hanging out with you guys. What a cool group of creative
>>>individuals we have here.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the great time and hospitality....and for putting up with
>>> me.......I only drove the wrong way down a freeway once.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>
>>
>Wasn't there some kinda non-disclosure thingy
signed about the pants and the van/sleep thing?
I sorta remember something like that...
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>You are SO the man for taking on the Thai spice brotha. And you didn't even
>wince or wimper. Yikes!
>
>AA
>
>"Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:463f734a@linux...
>> Thanks to Deej and AAron for dreaming up this vacation.
>>
>> It was beyond swell to meet new faces DJ, AAron, Dedric and to have
>> lunch with all and JamieK, John Macy, and Rohde too!
>>
>> Hot Damn, I mean next time I'll order medium Thai Fried Rice.
>>
>> El Miguel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:463f588f@linux...
>>>I always wonder what people will be like when I have been talking to them
>>>on the net and then I am finally going to meet them. These thoughts were
>>>sorta' in the back of my mind as I was driving up there Thursday. As it
>>>turned out, I don't think I could have imagined a better bunch of folks.
>>>It was great hanging out with you guys. What a cool group of creative
>>>individuals we have here.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the great time and hospitality....and for putting up with
>>> me.......I only drove the wrong way down a freeway once.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>
>>
>
>Sent you a bunch, pick one out if you wanna. Those are all from about
current to 2 or so years back.. hmm, maybe 3 on one of them.
AA
"Paul Braun" <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote in message
news:r0cv335e4krti4g5gtionisag77rb68t2f@4ax.com...
> After all these years of talking to people here, I only know what
> maybe one or two of you look like.
>
> I want visuals.
>
> So, if everyone will email me a recent photo of yourself to pbraun at
> ctgonline dot org, I will assemble a gallery of the Paris Family and
> post it on my server for all to see.
>
> Sound like a deal?
>
> Thought so.
>
> do it.
>
> pabIf by ambitious environmentalism you mean violence, violence is not a
great answer to global warming.
The new French president said in his acceptance speech that he will make
global warming a top priority. That sounds like responsible leadership.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Rich Lamanna wrote:
> He's right and so is Czech President Vaclav Klaus who has warned that
> environmentalism and the orthodoxy of global warming are a threat to human
> freedom, "the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
> prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its
> various softer variants. Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious
> environmentalism."
>
> http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37133
>
> Rich
>
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:463f3746$1@linux...
>> Sarkozy on global warming:
>>
>> "a great nation like the United States has the duty not to oppose the
>> fight against global warming, but to lead that battle, because what is
>> at stake is the destiny of mankind."
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>> Rich Lamanna wrote:
>>> France Elects a Thatcherite President
>>> Kenneth R. Timmerman
>>> Monday, May 7, 2007
>>> Newsmax.com
>>>
>>> On Sunday France elected a pro-American, conservative named Nicolas
> Sarkozy
>>> as its new president.
>>>
>>> The 52-year-old who beat back by 10 percentage points his Socialist
> rival,
>>> promises an unabashed Thatcherite agenda for France.
>>>
>>> Sarkozy also replaces the embattled Jacques Chirac, a relic from an
> earlier
>>> age of French politics, who made anti-Americanism his hallmark.
>>>
>>> Sarkozy campaigned on a platform of sweeping reforms, pledging to
> dismantle
>>> large portions of the social welfare state and to make France
> competitive on
>>> world markets again.
>>>
>>> You can read the rest here:
>>>
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/6/150434.sht ml?s=al&promo_code=3392-1
>>> Carry on,
>>> Rich
>>>
>>>
>
>Thanks for bringing that up, Rich. Talk about a "Swindle."
Sensationalism sells but that doesn't make it true. Let's take a look at
what we have here:
This from one of the scientists quoted in that film, Carl Wunsch:
"In the part of the "Swindle" film where I am describing the fact that
the ocean tends to expel carbon dioxide where it is warm, and to absorb
it where it is cold, my intent was to explain that warming the ocean
could be dangerous---because it is such a gigantic reservoir of carbon.
By its placement in the film, it appears that I am saying that since
carbon dioxide exists in the ocean in such large quantities, human
influence must not be very important --- diametrically opposite to the
point I was making --- which is that global warming is both real and
threatening in many different ways, some unexpected.
Many of us feel an obligation to talk to the media---it's part of our
role as scientists, citizens, and educators. The subjects are
complicated, and it is easy to be misquoted or quoted out context. My
experience in the past is that these things do happen, but usually
inadvertently --- most reporters really do want to get it right.
Channel 4 now says they were making a film in a series of "polemics".
There is nothing in the communication we had (much of it on the
telephone or with the film crew on the day they were in Boston) that
suggested they were making a film that was one-sided, anti-educational,
and misleading. I took them at face value---clearly a great error. I
knew I had no control over the actual content, but it never occurred to
me that I was dealing with people who already had a reputation for
distortion and exaggeration."
Here is a debunking from the climate scientists at realclimate.org:
"On Thursday the 8th, the UK TV Channel 4 aired a programme titled "The
G
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What replaces No Limit? [message #83036 is a reply to message #83034] |
Fri, 13 April 2007 08:44 |
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
;o)
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
news:463faabc$1@linux...
>
> It was absolutely one of the most enjoyable times
> I have had in a good while. I'm looking forward to
> the next one, maybe in Durango...???
>
>
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dedric@echomg.com> wrote:
>>It was great meeting everyone as well! Thanks for making the trip DJ and
>
>>Aaron!
>>Hope we can do it again sometime.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Dedric
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:463f588f@linux...
>>>I always wonder what people will be like when I have been talking to them
>
>>>on the net and then I am finally going to meet them. These thoughts were
>
>>>sorta' in the back of my mind as I was driving up there Thursday. As it
>
>>>turned out, I don't think I could have imagined a better bunch of folks.
> It
>>>was great hanging out with you guys. What a cool group of creative
>>>individuals we have here.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the great time and hospitality....and for putting up with
>>> me.......I only drove the wrong way down a freeway once.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>
>>
>I want a Kimber Gold Match. yeah baby...
DC
"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote:
>Who the hell put this guy in charge? That's such a romantic, fanciful and
>insane view. If they're coming for me, I'm ready. Damn, I wish I had the
>bread for that Semmerling LM-4, I guess I'll have to settle for the Colt
>Defender or the SPRINGFIELD 1911A1 GI MICRO 45ACP.
>
>Rich
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.org> wrote in message news:463f6e43$1@linux...
>>
>> Read this
>>
>> http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2007/20070506180903 .aspx
>>
>> then this:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/Rainbow-Six-Tom-Clancy/dp/0425170349
>>
>> And you shall understand...
>>
>> DC
>>
>
>Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>I've never said to take away anybodies guns. Guns are just inanimate
>objects like knifes, clubs, rocks, sticks. Only thing that could
>possibly be considered "evil" is the person using it.
And of course, should one find oneself in a situation in which "evil" has
lost its "quotes" then one might be well served by such a tool.
>Sounds to me more like the Turner Diaries is more up your ally if you
>believe this kinda of literature. You should get the video game thats
>been out for it. You'll get to shoot allot of guns in it.
And if you think the Clancy book is not eerily predictive of that article
I linked to then you have not read it. Why would you mistake
mainstream writing like Tom Clancy for the Turner Diaries? odd...
>> Without the second amendment, all the other amendments
>> are just suggestions.
>With out the second you wouldn't have anyone to shoot if they infringed
>on you 9 other rights. The lack of fair enforcement or of the 3rd to
>10th have allot more to do with your need to evoke the 2nd. If the 1st
>one is infringed upon by anyone then all the rest aren't worth shit
>anyways. But the first one is the one that anyone in a position of power
>will more likely to take away because it keeps people from asking questions.
There is no other way to rescue rights from a tyrant, as history has
shown. This is why the founders put the 2nd amendment in there. It is
a right, not subject to government. It is fundamental.
DCBTW, the thread was about the article I linked, not guns. Pretend I never
mentioned guns if it helps with your digestion, but that article is truly
frightening.
DCThese guys did mine, graphics and all (the Sarahtonin "Wayward" CD). I was
very happy with the result. http://www.nwmedia.com/
Sarah
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:463fa375$1@linux...
>
> Sorry, I forget who does these - I know there's a couple of you
> guys that do.
>
> I need to find out what's the quickest you could turn around
> 100, including a simple jacket print of some kind, and a price.
> Shrink-Wrapping optional - UPC
|
|
|
|
| Re: What replaces No Limit? [message #83050 is a reply to message #83036] |
Fri, 13 April 2007 17:55 |
neil[1]
Messages: 164
Registered: October 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/150434.shtml?s=al&promo_code=3392-1" target="_blank"> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/6/150434.sht ml?s=al&promo_code=3392-1
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Carry on,
>>> >>> Rich
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>
>>
>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>Actually, though this guy is obviously disturbed, I don't think the
>humans-as-disease-on-earth-as-organism is all that far-fetched as a crude
>analogy. And like viruses or bacteria that cause disease in our bodies,
>humans will die off if they "kill" the host, or if the host's defenses get
>the better of them. Nature has ways of dealing with overpopulation. If
we
>don't control it, nature will. No worries.
It's insane, and will lead to bad policy. The real problem with humanity
is not recognizing the inherent absurdity of teaching itself that the earth
is better off without it. Well how do you know, really? You just believe
it.
It is a perverted faith by which the left comforts itself of a supposed
superiority while accomplishing nothing but strife and misery. It is the
basic health and wealth of the free market that allows us even to consider
such nonsense. It's a bauble, an expensive indulgence that serves as a
status symbol for the guilt-ridden. Read the Clancy book. It is not a
political diatribe, it is a story of what could happen should these people
gain power.
>As far as the 2nd Amendment . . . listen, guns don't kill people, it's the
>bullets. :)
http://amazon.com/gp/product/0226493644
Hitler took guns away from the Jews first...
DCHi Sarah,
I had, in fact, found the cdbaby page but not the other one.. So now, at
least, I've heard one of their tunes.
Oh - While I was at cdbaby.com I accidently bought the Sarahtonin CD. Oops!
Was it recorded and mixed in Paris?
Gantt
"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>How 'bout here? http://cdbaby.com/cd/brainiac And while you're at CD Baby,
>be sure to check out "Wayward" by Sarahtonin, a truly fabulous CD that has
>nothing at all to do with me personally. :)
>
>I found a Brainiac's Daughter song here,
>http://www.ilike.com/artist/brainiacsDAUGHTER but that's about it for my
>search.
>
>You probably already found this stuff, huh? Oh well, good luck.
>
>S
>
>
>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:463fd48a$1@linux...
>>
>> The band took their name from that song. Apparently they broke up in
2000
>> just before launching a national tour. The woman who sang and played
keys
>> is looking for an engineer/producer to work with (in other words - a spec
>> production deal) and I'm intrigued. I'd like to track down a copy of the
>> band's CD "Behave" but it's out of print.
>>
>> Gantt
>>
>> "chuck " <c@c.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I don't know it as a band, its the title of a song on the Dukes of the
>>>Stratosphere
>>>albumn from when I was back in college. That was an alias for XTC, it
was
>>>one of their little side projects.
>>>
>>>Chuck
>>>
>>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>..Brainiacs Daughter? I'm trying to find some of their music to listen
>>>to
>>>>or buy, but no luck!
>>>>
>>>>Gantt
>>>
>>
>
>Thanks DC. My day was promising to be bland. Now I will be chuckling to myself
for hours.
Gene
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>Nope. That is the smear campaign, not the facts. There is some
>dispute, many challenges remain and have been strengthened since the
>movie.
>
>Besides, the prejudice in what you said is clear. How do you know that
>someone who questions the current orthodoxy is an anti-environmentalist?
>
>http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1945
>
>The real scary thing for the Gore-ites is the ongoing research into
>climate change on Mars... It seems to be a parallel to our own. If that
>is the case, humans are not the cause.
>
>DC
>
>
>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>Haven't we already been through this one? Isn't this Durkin guy a
>>well-known and questionably honest anti-environmentalist who's being sued
>by
>>some of scientists he used in the film for misleading editing of their
>>views? Rings a bell somewhere back there . . .
>>
>>S
>>
>>
>>
>>"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
|
|
|
|
| Re: What replaces No Limit? [message #83057 is a reply to message #83050] |
Sat, 14 April 2007 00:03 |
erlilo
Messages: 405
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
#64;NOSPmyrealbox.com" target="_blank">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>Thanks DC. My day was promising to be bland. Now I will be chuckling to
myself
>for hours.
>Gene
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>Nope. That is the smear campaign, not the facts. There is some
>>dispute, many challenges remain and have been strengthened since the
>>movie.
>>
>>Besides, the prejudice in what you said is clear. How do you know that
>>someone who questions the current orthodoxy is an anti-environmentalist?
>>
>>http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1945
>>
>>The real scary thing for the Gore-ites is the ongoing research into
>>climate change on Mars... It seems to be a parallel to our own. If that
>>is the case, humans are not the cause.
>>
>>DC
>>
>>
>>
>>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>>Haven't we already been through this one? Isn't this Durkin guy a
>>>well-known and questionably honest anti-environmentalist who's being sued
>>by
>>>some of scientists he used in the film for misleading editing of their
>
>>>views? Rings a bell somewhere back there . . .
>>>
>>>S
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Rich Lamanna" <richard.lamanna@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:463fc561@linux...
>>>> Jamie and the rest of you Parisites, here's another view regarding the
>>>> global warming polemic, ideology, religion and orthodoxy. These scientists
>>>> were involved with the IPCC's report, but dissociated themselves with
>>the
>>>> same report when blatant omissions and mistruths were put forth by the
>>
>>>> IPCC.
>>>> They scientifically disprove that CO2 is the cause for temperature change.
>>>> Before you all jump out of your skin and shout, "2500 top scientists
>are
>>
>>>> on
>>>> the IPCC panel and therefore it can't be wrong", you really should watch
>>>> this with an open mind. You will, if you have an shred of rational,
>>>> logical
>>>> reasoning, question the present hysteria over the global warming debate.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.jonhs.net/freemovies/great_global_warming_swindle .htm
>>>>
>>>> Just keeping it real,
>>>> Rich
>>>>
>>>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:463f4b03$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Neil, Sarkozy is in the news right now and his comment caught my
>>>>> eye. I think his perspective on global warming is worth sharing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -Jamie
>>>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Neil wrote:
>>>>> > Whaddya have a search engine portal permanently set to the
>>>>> > term "global warming" or something?
>>>>>
>>>>> > Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> Sarkozy on global warming:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> "a great nation like the United States has the duty not to oppose
>>the
>>>>> >> fight against global warming, but to lead that battle, because what
>>is
>>>>> >> at stake is the destiny of mankind."
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Cheers,
>>>>> >> -Jamie
>>>>> >> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Rich Lamanna wrote:
>>>>> >>> France Elects a Thatcherite President
>>>>> >>> Kenneth R. Timmerman
>>>>> >>> Monday, May 7, 2007
>>>>> >>> Newsmax.com
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> On Sunday France elected a pro-American, conservative named Nicolas
>>>> Sarkozy
>>>>> >>> as its new president.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> The 52-year-old who beat back by 10 percentage points his Socialist
>>>> rival,
>>>>> >>> promises an unabashed Thatcherite agenda for France.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Sarkozy also replaces the embattled Jacques Chirac, a relic from
>>an
>>>> earlier
>>>>> >>> age of French politics, who made anti-Americanism his hallmark.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Sarkozy campaigned on a platform of sweeping reforms, pledging
to
>>>> dismantle
>>>>> >>> large portions of the social welfare state and to make France
>>>> competitive
>>>>> > on
>>>>> >>> world markets again.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> You can read the rest here:
>>>>> >>>
>>>> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/5/6/150434.sht ml?s=al&promo_code=3392-1
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Carry on,
>>>>> >>> Rich
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinthetroposphere.com> wrote in message
news:46408072$1@linux...
>
> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>Actually, though this guy is obviously disturbed, I don't think the
>>humans-as-disease-on
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 05 16:52:08 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11067 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
