Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #60926 is a reply to message #60922] |
Sun, 04 December 2005 11:45   |
audioguy_editout_
Messages: 249
Registered: December 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
#64;no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's the EMU directory thing ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martin Harrington wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That sounds right, but I'm going from memory here as I don't have
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paris
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> anymore and haven't used it for about 2 years.
>>>>>>>>> Don't forget the Emu directory thing though.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>>Well Martin, you do great work and it brings great joy to millions of
people. nice job !!
Martin Harrington wrote:
> Yep, that was me, a lifetime ago now.
> 1979, the year my eldest daughter was born.Thanks Pete.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43b5edeb@linux...
> Well Martin, you do great work and it brings great joy to millions of
> people. nice job !!
>
> Martin Harrington wrote:
>> Yep, that was me, a lifetime ago now.
>> 1979, the year my eldest daughter was born.i don't get it? seriously
Martin Harrington wrote:
> Thanks Pete.Put 16 tracks in constrained mode. Add 1 BlueTubes VST to each channel.
Press play. BAM! ***Assertion Failed: FileCache.c:462 offset>
=0&&<p-> count
I guess I need to buy a new c:462. heheHey Martin, If you have a minute, what setup are you running now
instead of Paris.
John wrote:
> i don't get it? seriously
>
> Martin Harrington wrote:
>
>> Thanks Pete.I use full aiff files.
I use Itunes as my main Play back at home so i want the best sound I have
a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>be the same quality in half the size?
>
> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>
>Happy Holidays,
>PeteYeah mp3s and the like truly do suck for sound. Those dumb kids are
wasting their money in my opinion.
Jpmoss wrote:
> I use full aiff files.
> I use Itunes as my main Play back at hom
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #60927 is a reply to message #60926] |
Sun, 04 December 2005 11:54 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e so i want the best sound I have
> a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
> Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
> quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
>> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>>be the same quality in half the size?
>>
>> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>>
>>Happy Holidays,
>>Pete
>
>Gotta agree.I probably won't buy much from itunes.Just get the
cds and import.
Pete
"Jpmoss" <jp@ncounty.net> wrote:
>
> I use full aiff files.
> I use Itunes as my main Play back at home so i want the best sound I have
>a pc the I riged with a emu 1404 through a bench mark. I dont buy song from
>Itunes as I find it wrong to charge top dooler for files that are less in
>quility than cd. j"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
>>collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
>>which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
>>also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
>> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
>>same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
>>be the same quality in half the size?
>>
>> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
>>it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>>
>>Happy Holidays,
>>Pete
>Hmmm.......never tried this because I don't normlly track to Cubase. Cool
feature though. I'll \have to give it a go.
;o)
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:43b5e740@linux...
> You can do it in Nuendo, though, and probably SX3.
> There is a channel input fader that equates to the level being put down on
> disk...one for each track.
> --
> Martin Harrington
> www.lendanear-sound.com
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:43b5d878@linux...
> > Martin,
> >
> > I'm thinking that since no one uses mixers anymore during tracking and
> > *riding the fader* really doesn't apply as far as boosting/attenuating
> > signal levels in DAW control surfaces like the C-16, the appropriate
> > terminology for this situation while tracking would be *riding the
> > pot*....and somehow that just doesn't seem a good thing to discuss in
> > polite
> > company so it's easier to just use a compressor.
> >
> > ;o)
> >
> > "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> > news:43b5c2b5@linux...
> >> I know I'm going to sound like an "old fart" as Deej so eloquently put
it
> > a
> >> few posts back, but I see this a lot with "younger engineers" (sorry),
> > that
> >> weren't bought up with analogue.
> >> They are told that all you need to do is set an optimum level, and then
> > fix
> >> it in the mix.....Wrong...........
> >> You must always try a
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #60928 is a reply to message #60924] |
Sun, 04 December 2005 11:54 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nd get the most amount of signal to tape, (disk),
> >> allowing for dynamics and song type of course.
> >> Riding record levels was one of the first things we were ever taught,
(I
> >> can't remember being taught it, but I know I was), because if you under
> >> recorded with tape, all you got was noise when you had to ride the
levels
> >> eventually in the mix, especially vocals.
> >> That's not to say we didn't limit or compress, but we still rode those
> >> levels.
> >> Rant off...thanks for reading.
> >> Cheers
> >> Martin Harrington
> >> www.lendanear-sound.com
> >>
> >> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:43b5b29a$1@linux...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This is the approach I often take. Or at times, if there's just a
> >> > couple
> >> > of noticeable sections, I'll just do a volume change on the track
> > itself.
> >> > Simply cut the track boost up the low bit to match better with the
> >> > rest.
> >> > Often you'll find the performer only uses a couple of different
> >> > intensities
> >> > through the performance, so cutting at the change point(s) and adding
> >> > or
> >> > subtracting a few db can do the job.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Kim.
> >> >
> >> > "Lance Reichert" <lance.rocks@nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ASUS A8V Deluxe.....AMI bios [message #60932 is a reply to message #60931] |
Sun, 04 December 2005 12:49 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
GHT: 0px">
> >> >> <DIV>"John" <<A href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A>> wrote =
> >> >>in=20
> >> >> message <A =
> >> >>href=3D"news:43b554dc@linux">news:43b554dc@linux</A>...</DIV>DJ is=20
> >> >> from the future. I was just playing around so I was trying to =
> >> >><BR>find=20
> >> >> a plug to do this but it makes TOTAL sense to ride the faders
> >> >> and=20
> >> >> <BR>automate. DOH.<BR><BR>This girl who sang is an untrained =
> >> >>teen and=20
> >> >> I was just recording her for <BR>fun. So I was thinking a plug =
> >> >>would=20
> >> >> totally tame it. I was wrong ;-)<BR><BR>cujo wrote:<BR>> =
> >> >>Almost=20
> >> >> simultaneous answering here, strange DJ's post says 8:07 but
it=20
> >> >> wasnt<BR>> there when I looked<BR>> <BR>> "cujo" <<A=20
> >> >> =
> >>
>
>>>href=3D"mailto:chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com">chris@nospamapplemanstudio
=
> >> >>.com</A>>=20
> >> >> wrote:<BR>> <BR>>>I am sure you tried this but,=20
> >> >> automation?<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>>John <<A=20
> >> >> href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A>>=20
> >> >> wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>>I have a female vocal that has =
> >> >>huge=20
> >> >> dynamic range. She starts out =
> >> >>like<BR>>><BR>>>>a ballad=20
> >> >> and then is belting it out like whitney. I tried a variety=20
> >> >> of<BR>>><BR>>>>compressors but none seem able to tame =
> >> >>
> >> >> this. Limiters seem to work =
> >> >>the<BR>>><BR>>>>best=20
> >> >> so far. I'm going to try a combo of the two but just wondered=20
> >> >> what<BR>>><BR>>>>you guys would do for plugins. =
> >> >>I tried=20
> >> >> C1 Comp, RenVox, Timeworks <BR>>>>Mastering Compressor, =
> >> >>Ultrafunk=20
> >> >> compressor (worked better), Bluetubes,<BR>> <BR>>=20
> >> >> <BR>>>>Voxengo, but the Bluetubes limiter seemed to do the =
> >> >>best job=20
> >> >> so far.<BR>>>><BR>>>>Where would you be going on=20
> >> >> this. Is there a stereo NoLimit? I=20
> >> >> forget.<BR>>><BR>>>> If so, is that a =
> >> >>possibility? What=20
> >> >> plugin can jam this into the=20
> >> >> =
> >> >>pocket.<BR>>>><BR>>>>Thanks,<BR>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #61014 is a reply to message #61001] |
Tue, 06 December 2005 13:31 |
Tony Benson
Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; >> >mainly
>>> >> >> use the mouse for controlling everything on the mixer(s) and such.
>>> >> >Anyway,
>>> >> >> I was working on a few projects and found that I sonically liked
> the
>>> >> >levels
>>> >> >> of one of the projects. It is very frustrating going back through
>>> all
>>> >> the
>>> >> >> other songs in the other projects to bring down each channel fader
>>> >> >individually.
>>> >> >> My question is... is there a way to control all active (active
>>meaning
>>> >> >there
>>> >> >> is something on the channel) channel faders at the same time?
>>Another
>>> >> >words,
>>> >> >> I have all the channel faders set properly, but I want to bring
> them
>>> >all
>>> >> >> down a few db's. Is there a way to bring them all down at the
>>> >> >> same
>>> >time
>>> >> >> without doing them individually?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Lastly, I don't have any automation set, so that won't be effected
>>> by
>>> >> >this.
>>> >> >> In fact, I try to stay away from automation because of this
>>> >> >> reason.
>>> >> >There
>>> >> >> may be an easy way to "edit" the automation, but I haven't figured
>>> it
>>> >> out.
>>> >> >> I just try to stay away from it. Some day I may delve into that
>>> >learning
>>> >> >> process... lol. I am old school. Just use Paris for basic
>>recording,
>>> >> >mixing....
>>> >> >> thanks in advance... and Happy New Year (2006)!
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>Edna, I saw you had the answer on normalize right after I sent mine. Sorry.
Erling
"Ed" <askme@email.com> skrev i melding news:43b9a83a$1@linux...
>
> Ummm... I am afraid your advice didn't work Edna. I failed to mention
> that
> I am using Paris 3.0. I only see the "normalize mix" option in the
> Functions
> section on the Mixer. When I select it, it wants me to adjust the total
> mix by maximun Db. I'll have to play with it I suppose. But I could have
> sworn there was a way to control all faders at the same time....
>
> "Edna" <edna@texomaonline.com> wrote:
>>Well I just got into Paris a couple months ago. Its my first DAW. I am
>>amazed at what all it can do. I did try out a Roland unit one time but
> was
>>disappointed with the sound - dead, cold, etc. I am using Paris to track
>>vocals and synth mainly for church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #61051 is a reply to message #61014] |
Tue, 06 December 2005 23:31 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
them up =
or
>>
>>down.
>>
>>>>For example say you want to lower them all by 3db. On an unused =
channel
>>>>move its fader to 10 and then normalize with highest at 7. This =
brings
>>>>down all faders by 3. (To bring them back up to where they were,
>>
>>normalize
>>
>>>>to 10.)
>>>>Edna
>>>>
>>>>"Ed" <askme@email.com> wrote in message news:43b952d0$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>>Hi All. Perhaps a quick n' easy question for you Paris power =
users.
>=20
> I
>=20
>>>>mainly
>>>>
>>>>>use the mouse for controlling everything on the mixer(s) and =
such.
>>>>
>>>>Anyway,
>>>>
>>>>>I was working on a few projects and found that I sonically liked =
the
>>>>
>>>>levels
>>>>
>>>>>of one of the projects. It is very frustrating going back =
through
>=20
> all
>=20
>>>the
>>>
>>>>>other songs in the other projects to bring down each channel =
fader
>>>>
>>>>individually.
>>>>
>>>>> My question is... is there a way to control all active (active =
meaning
>>>>
>>>>there
>>>>
>>>>>is something on the channel) channel faders at the same time? =
Another
>>>>
>>>>words,
>>>>
>>>>>I have all the channel faders set properly, but I want to bring =
them
>>
>>all
>>
>>>>>down a few db's. Is there a way to bring them all down at the =
same
>>
>>time
>>
>>>>>without doing them individually?
>>>>>
>>>>>Lastly, I don't have any automation set, so that won't be =
effected
>=20
> by
>=20
>>>>this.
>>>>
>>>>> In fact, I try to stay away from automation because of this =
reason.
>>>>
>>>>There
>>>>
>>>>>may be an easy way to "edit" the automation, but I haven't =
figured
>=20
> it
>=20
>>>out.
>>>
>>>>> I just try to stay away from it. Some day I may delve into that
>>
>>learning
>>
>>>>>process... lol. I am old school. Just use Paris for basic =
recording,
>>>>
>>>>mixing....
>>>>
>>>>> thanks in advance... and Happy New Year (2006)!
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
------=_NextPart_000_01A9_01C61075.0C8B9490
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I've been a Control E user for=20
years.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"John" <<A href=3D"mailto:no@no.com">no@no.com</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A =
href=3D"news:43ba69b5@linux">news:43ba69b5@linux</A>..
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #61122 is a reply to message #60926] |
Thu, 08 December 2005 13:09 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
change inserts (native or eds)
> * move loop or punch points
> * enable or disable loop or punch
>
> Rendering
>
> DON'T
> * render tracks with different lengths
>
> NoLimit
>
> DON'T
> * use 0 or 50 valuesYes!
"RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and I'm
>wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
>
>Thanks
>Kent
>
>Bitchin'. Will I then have two active submixes? Do I leave the cards
connected in the computer? Still can't share card resources though, right?
Thanks.
Kent
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43bb2b84$1@linux...
>
> Yes!
>
> "RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and I'm
> >wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Kent
> >
> >
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>Hey guys,
>
>I know that this is an old thread, but I have to disagree with assessments
>on Pro Tools sound quality.
>
>First, I mix with Pro Tools HD at our Church's studio for major release
Gospel
>Cds. Pro Tools HD sounds wonderful with low and high track counts
To "sum" it up, IMO... HD = "Good"; earlier PT systems = "Bad"
Never mixed in "LE", so I cna't comment there, but I've done
some overdubs in it... the 002's convertors were adequate/OK.
NeilDon't forget the BNC cable from MEC out to 442 in, that's assuming your MEC
is on card A. NO, can't share resources between submixes. Yeap, cards stay
connected as before. That's my setup here, 2 card on MEC/442 works great.
Have fun..!
Rob_A
"RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:43bb2ca7@linux...
> Bitchin'. Will I then have two active submixes? Do I leave the cards
> connected in the computer? Still can't share card resources though,
right?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kent
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> nws:43bb2b84$1@linux...
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> > "RK" <kent510745@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >I have a two card system with one MEC. I do have a 442, however, and
I'm
> > >wondering if I can hook it up to the second card?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >Kent
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>Don't try to edit the length or move too many tracks at one time in the edit
window...crash city.
"jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote in message
news:43bb23ef@linux...
> sometimes, when playing, if I hit play again it locks up.
>
> John wrote:
>
>> Can anyone add or clarify my new list of Paris no nos ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Things to keep you from crashing.
>>
>>
>> In STOP mode
>>
>> DON'T
>> * select a new Native Effect if the current one is open
>> * enter record mode without first setting your record path
>> (Ctrl-R)
>> * use the name of the project for your recording path
>> * save with looping enabled
>>
>> During Playback or Recording
>>
>> DON'T
>> * change inserts (native or eds)
>> * move loop or punch points
>> * enable or disable loop or punch
>>
>> Rendering
>> DON'T
>> * render tracks with different lengths
>>
>> No
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #61124 is a reply to message #61122] |
Thu, 08 December 2005 14:33 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
p; save with =
looping=20
enabled<BR>>><BR>>> During Playback or=20
Recording<BR>>><BR>>> =20
DON'T<BR>>> * change =
inserts=20
(native or eds)<BR>>> =
* move=20
loop or punch points<BR>>> =
* =20
enable or disable loop or punch<BR>>><BR>>>=20
Rendering<BR>>> =20
DON'T<BR>>> * render =
tracks=20
with different lengths<BR>>><BR>>>=20
NoLimit<BR>>><BR>>> =20
DON'T<BR>>> * use 0 or =
50=20
values <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C610B3.181A8760--FWIW, I grabbed the PT M Powered app demo and it loses my M Audio Firewire
Audiophile rather regularly - requiring a reboot.
AA
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:43bb0adb$1@linux...
> John,Look on the B&H site,
>
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=search& ;Q=&b=1315&shs=&ci=9576&ac=&Submit.x=17& amp;Submit.y=12
>
> They have all the cards you'll need plus all the software.
> Buying any M-Audio product means you can buy PT M-Powered for around $300
> Martin Harrington
> www.lendanear-sound.com
>
> "John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43babdce@linux...
>> But how much money is it? And can it use VSTs ?
>>
>> LaMont wrote:
>>> Hey John,
>>>
>>> I don't really know if LE has PDC, HD does. You can get 16 i/os in LE
>>> with
>>> the Follwoing Products:
>>>
>>> -Digi 002(Rack)or not
>>> -M-Audio Project Mix I/O
>>> -FireWire 1814
>>>
>>> All of the above units have a additional Adat ports. That way you can
>>> add
>>> 8 channels of I/O of your choice.
>>> LaMont
>>>
>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Does PT LE have autocompensation for plugs? How much can I get 16 I/Os
>>>
>>>
>>>>for ?
>>>>
>>>>LaMont wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hey guys,
>>>>>
>>>>>I know that this is an old thread, but I have to disagree with
>>>>>assessments
>>>>>on Pro Tools sound quality.
>>>>>
>>>>>First, I mix with Pro Tools HD at our Church's studio for major release
>>>
>>> Gospel
>>>
>>>>>Cds. Pro Tools HD sounds wonderful with low and high track counts and
>>>
>>> ITB
>>>
>>>>>(in the Box) or summed to the SSL,
>>>>>
>>>>>At my home studio, I have PT LE & Nuendo and while I love Nuendo's
>>>>>elequent
>>>>>editing and nice soft sound, it's 32 bit floating mixer in a major pain
>>>
>>> in
>>>
>>>>>!@# to mix aggresive Rock, R &B, Hip hop with. Onthe other hand, those
>>>
>>> same
>>>
>>>>>mixes done in PT LE, have that sparkle and width. In Nuendo, after 30
>>>
>>> tracks,
>>>
>>>>>things start's getting "smearded" and tracks levels tends to get lost
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>>>they don't sit right.
>>>>>However, in PT Le, (same songs, tracks are not smeared, levels stay
>>>>>intacked,
>>>>>and the overall mix sounds very professional, just like mixes in
>>>>>Paris..
>>>>>
>>>>>Some local Engineer friends in the area( Motown), have been in
>>>>>discussions
>>>>>about the state of current DAWs and what's working and what's not.
>>>>>Opinions
>>>>>varied,but the one constant opinion that was stated was how dificult it
>>>
>>> was
>>>
>>>>>to mix in Cubase and Nuendo on mixes over 30 tracks. No matter what i/o
>>>
>>> converters(Apogee,Lucid,Motu,
>>>
>>>>>RME) mixing Rock , R&B, Hip-Hop is a dificult chore in
>>>>>SX/Nuendo..Where
>>>>>as mixing in Paris and Pro Tools is not.. Hey,Just one
|
|
|
|
| Re: OK...new computer.....here's the plan...and a question [message #61128 is a reply to message #61124] |
Thu, 08 December 2005 15:06 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>
>Hello and Happy New Year!
I recently released a CD that was recorded completely in PARIS. It was mixed
in PARIS too but Distressors and a Rane MOJO compressor were enlisted mainly
to process the bass, snare and kick on a few occasions. MP3 samples of all
the songs are available at www.imaginaryfreds.com
I have worked on many local musicians' projects but am hardly a seasoned
recording engineer like many of you. This is a great newsgroup and I have
followed your threads for years in an effort to improve my knowledge of PARIS.
Although I have nothing useful to offer in return, I would be grateful if
some of you could listen and comment (especially regarding my screw ups with
PARIS or whatever that upset your ears!).
This CD was mastered by a professional at his mastering studio.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Jim
Athlon 1.2MHz
1 MEC, 16 in, 16 out
2 EDS cards
UAD
VST
Jim Romanow
Box 676
Storrs, CT 06268
balhat@earthlink.netTry uping your cache.
"jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote in message
news:43bb23ef@linux...
> sometimes, when playing, if I hit play again it locks up.
>
> John wrote:
>
>> Can anyone add or clarify my new list of Paris no nos ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Things to keep you from crashing.
>>
>>
>> In STOP mode
>>
>> DON'T
>> * select a new Native Effect if the current one is open
>> * enter record mode without first setting your record path
>> (Ctrl-R)
>> * use the name of the project for your recording path
>> * save with looping enabled
>>
>> During Playback or Recording
>>
>> DON'T
>> * change inserts (native or eds)
>> * move loop or punch points
>> * enable or disable loop or punch
>>
>> Rendering
>> DON'T
>> * render tracks with different lengths
>>
>> NoLimit
>>
>> DON'T
>> * use 0 or 50 valuesfor some reason messing with the audio window browse slider seems to really
tick off Paris most of the time.
AA
"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:43bb2108@linux...
> Can anyone add or clarify my new list of Paris no nos ?
>
>
>
> Things to keep you from crashing.
>
>
> In STOP mode
>
> DON'T
> * select a new Native Effect if the current one is open
> * enter record mode without first setting your record path (Ctrl-R)
> * use the name of the project for your recording path
> * save with looping enabled
>
> During Playback or Recording
>
> DON'T
> * change inserts (native or eds)
> * move loop or punch points
> * enable or disable loop or punch
>
> Rendering
>
> DON'T
> * render tracks with different lengths
>
> NoLimit
>
> DON'T
> * use 0 or 50 valuesHate to say it pete but MP3.. I've been burned by the 'oh, we don't support
that codec/format' thing too many times, and MP3 is not going anywhere
anytime soon. If I want the better res version I put the real thing in the
CD/DVD player. I'm pretty much on the go these days though, and I don't need
hassles.
YMMV
AA
"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:43b5ecc4$1@linux...
>
> Just got a 60gig Ipod and I'm going to start importing my cd
> collection tonight.Just wondering which formats are used most and
> which bit rates.Seems like AAC might be the way to go.I could
> also see doing a mixture of AAC and Wavs or Apple Lossless.
> One thing that confused me;it says Apple Lossless gives you the
> same quality as AIFF and Wav,but is half the size.Can it really
> be the same quality in half the size?
>
> Anyway,this looks to be a really fun toy and putting mixes on
> it versus the whole cd burning thing will be quite cool.
>
> Happy Holidays,
> PeteKeep notes bro, every time you build. Funny how those little snags are
always the ones that kick us in the sack for days until we cry like Homer
"DOH" and realize just what we forgot.
AA
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:43b985f7$1@linux...
> Found the problem. Didn't have the "allow users to change my files"
> settings
> clicked on the SX computer so though I could transfer from the SX DAw to
> the
> Paris DAW (backasswards from what I need to be doing), I couldn't transfer
> from the Paris DAw to the Cubase DAW. Pilot error .......as usual.
>
> Seems like I need to build a DAW a week just to keep my syanpses firing
> properly. When I go for a couple of years, I forget one of the
> 327443333333337892 simple little things that are necessary to make this
> happen.
>
> I did talk to Chris Ludwig earlier today. It ws gratifying to know that
> 99.9% of the wierdness I've experienced while building this DAW has also
> been encountered by others.
>
> OK.......now where was I????
>
> ;o)
>
> "EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
> news:43b97979$1@linux...
>> That was the issue here... sometimes it would work, other times... not
>> so much.
>>
>> David.
>>
>> DJ wrote:
>> > Nope......didn't work after all.........Grrrrrrrr ...........;o(
>> >
>> > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>> > news:43b972eb$1@linux...
>> >
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 07 20:44:15 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08801 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
