| Surface... [message #85640] |
Wed, 30 May 2007 08:48  |
DC
Messages: 722 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
VnBVAfln/AM5b/wDOO35w6p5X 0X8ufzLtPMGp
ed7XU7vyrC9nqFiL46LIq6haRSX1rbp9ctkdJ5LQsLhbd47n0vqzpKVWH/n5 /wA5J3n5Kfnp
/wA4x+Qr8aVb+QvzjHnVfOWpXNrd3eqJNoOl29xpdtpMVpJyluLu6uFgWBYJ pJ3aOKBPVdQV
Xp8H/ORn5QXvk3yX590HzL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Surface... [message #85716 is a reply to message #85715] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 11:00   |
Aaron Allen
 Messages: 1988 Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7 FXYq7FXYq7FX
Yq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FX Yq7FXYq7FXYq
7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq 7FXYq7FXYq7F
XYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYq7FXYqsc7Ad69MIQX//2Q==
--------------040904050601010800090200--Anyone had any experience with these? Thinking of using one in a mobile
rig.
Thanks,
JeffWay to go Jeff, got it.
Thanks
Rob
"Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
news:468460c8$1@linux...
> Rob,
>
> If I got your email right, it should be arriving shortly.
>
> Jeff
>
> Arsenault wrote:
> > Anyone have the fancy signal path diagram that was posted on the group a
few
> > years back?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >Robert wrote:
> Way to go Jeff, got it.
> Thanks
> Rob
>
Glad to help
:-)
JH
> "Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:468460c8$1@linux...
>
>>Rob,
>>
>>If I got your email right, it should be arriving shortly.
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>> Arsenault wrote:
>>
>>>Anyone have the fancy signal path diagram that was posted on the group a
>
> few
>
>>>years back?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Rob
>>>
>>>
>
>
>Yes, I believe it would. I would try to update OSX to the latest version.
The first version of OSX is about six years old, and might be a bit buggy.
"Eugene B" <martinlancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Yes os9.22 and the 1st version of osx on the master drive
>I was told that the computer wouldn't work unless osx
>was on there.I would like to continue to use paris
>on the main drive and install a CURRENT version of osx on the second drive
>while updating peak and using logic uad melodyne
>etc there. Iwould then record to an external firewire.
>Would this work
>ntt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>"Eu
|
|
|
|
| Re: Surface... [message #85719 is a reply to message #85715] |
Thu, 31 May 2007 13:52  |
dc[3]
Messages: 895 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
Neil wrote:
> So, if I have an Intel Pentium "D" 820 64-bit dual-core, do I
> need this patch? Or is the "Core2Duo" (what this patch says
> it's for) a different series?
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>> Intel makes M$oft look like a highly more, honestly competitive company.
>>
>
>
>> What's scary is that 'userland' code should be able to exploit some of these.
>> Bad bad bad.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HI Thad,
>>> Excellent thanks been looking for info on what the "problem" . The sad
>>>
>>> part is that AMD has had very few of these type of design problems in
>>> their history.
>>> But now are barely afloat because they don't rush stuff out. Intel made
>>>
>>> a decided effort to bring down AMD by pushing out their dual-core
>>> technology earlier and now selling their cpus at what I bet is a lose to
>>>
>>> force AMD to drop their more. Sense AMD is 8 times smaller than Intel it
>>>
>>> is easy for Intel to loose some money to gain more market share. Even we
>>>
>>> were forced by Intel drastic moves and having AMD hot a brick wall in
>>> development for a while. We had been a AMD only shop for at least years
>>>
>>> before that. Now we sell nothing but Intel. There is nothing by AMD
>>> worth selling at this point. Hopefully this will help give AMD a kick up
>>>
>>> so they can survive Intel's onslaught. If AMD is finally able get the
>>> new multi-core technology they have out of the lab you will see many
>>> people going back to them. I bet Apple will be the first one.
>>> Chris
&
|
|
|
|