|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No response from ID For Paris 3.0 challenge [message #65613 is a reply to message #65604] |
Wed, 22 March 2006 05:38   |
hank
Messages: 25
Registered: August 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
yahoo.com" target="_blank">daniel_burneNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Given that I move my rig around a fair bit and that's driving me nuts (MEC
>with 8 i/o, adat card, 2 eds cards, desktop pc, flatpanels, separate pres
>and mixing desk, etc), I was thinking about getting a laptop and an interface.
>assuming a quiet laptop, i could then probably also track in the same room
>which would be very sweet!
>
>Interface wise, the goal is really to have something capable to tracking
>acoustic guitar with at least 3 inputs. That said, might be useful to have
>the option for midi and extra inputs (you could just about track drums with
>8). I think the focusrite sapphire pro is the best bet here (8 pre amps,
>adat, midi and spdif i/o, etc).
>
>however, where i'm more stuck is the software front. since most of my ongoing
>projects are trapped in paris, it'd be very useful to have some kind of
communicability
>between the systems. e.g. exporting projects. i'm guessing OMF works for
>protools. but i've heard good things about cubase sx3. it'd be nice to have
>something that can handle softsynths, midi, automatic latency compensation,
>etc.
>
>it'd be great to be able to transfer projects from paris to the laptop,
do
>most of the additional tracking and editing in the laptop, and mix in paris
>(perhaps streaming out of the laptop into paris). otherwise mixing would
>i guess require rendering out from the laptop as 24bit wavs with the same
>start time, converting individually to 24 bit pafs (is there a bulk utility
>for this?) and importing.
>
>i'm leaning towards sx3 and doing transfers via adat (or even d/a then a/d).
>a little worried about
|
|
|
|
| Re: No response from ID For Paris 3.0 challenge [message #65614 is a reply to message #65613] |
Wed, 22 March 2006 05:41 |
hank
Messages: 25
Registered: August 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
unnecessary a/d and the 20bit limitations on adat.
>is there a more elegant solution, perhaps?
>
>finally, i'm pretty clueless beyond paris in terms of interface, so something
>logical, similar or relatively straightforward to learn (but not necessarily
>limited in features) would be great.
>
>many thanks for any thoughts,
>danThese are pretty cool if you want to do this. I think I could make one
myself that was better suited to my needs, but the idea is a good one. The
ones I'm using are by a company named SEN FU. They have been discontinued,
but they are great because you can stack them.
so If I use EDSransfer 8,16 with the Senderella will work bussing VST
plugins to Paris auxes and bussing multiple drum tracks to a stereo pairwith
zero latency from the Senderella app......correct? Now whjat about the
plugins themselves? For instance, If I were bussing tracks to a Waves REN
Comp, would the 64sample latency still be an issue?
;o)
Regards,
Deej
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:4443a2b8$1@linux...
>
> Dear DJ,
> Nice thought I never thought of taking apart a case...
>
> The magicnumbers are
> EDSTransfer 8,16
>
> The first number makes Paris run fast enouph to have a 0 latency
senderella
> working and the second number ensures that the disk steraming can work
reliable
> as opposed to havinga transfer of 8,8
>
> Dimitrios
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >Dimitrios,
> >
> > So the question is if the first number 8 instead of 16 makes Paris work
> too
> >> hard and produces much heat.
> >> But with 8,16 transfer (8,8 can work too but streaming with too many
> >tracks
> >> over many cards is problematic) we have Paris fly !!!
> >
> >I'm not quite sureI understand what settings would make Paris fly but
create
> >too much heat. what would be the fastest possible Paris settings? My ED
> >cards are
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No response from ID For Paris 3.0 challenge [message #65636 is a reply to message #65629] |
Wed, 22 March 2006 19:16 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;> > >>>> With that latency you can work your automation better right ?
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> The how on my next post just curious to see if anyone is quick
>>enouph
>>> > >>to
>>> > >>>> respond that he likes what he reads :)
>>> > >>>> Regards,
>>> > >>>> Dimitrios
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>Never saw it served with Lemon. Only some of the hefe weizens come with lemon
in the old country, and then usually only the lightest ones.
TCB
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>A fruity, very tasty beer. Mellow, even. Do they serve it with a slice of
>lemon there?
>
>Jimmy
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:4442eb38$2@linux...
>>
>> You should have one in Pilzn, the otherwise unremarkable Czech town that
>lends
>> its name. Freaking unbelievable.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote:
>> >I forgot about Pilsner Urquell. That's a very nice sip.
>> >
>> >Bill
>
>
>Thank you everyone, for your detailed responses! :)
Sarah
"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:4442c9f3$1@linux...
> Hi gang,
>
> I asked this question, or something like it, many months ago, but
> nursing school's data overload has long since pushed all your responses
> right out of my brain.
>
> The question is, to version 3 or not to version 3? The only thing I
> remember that attracted me to it was the ability to render tracks, which
> sounded like a handy feature.
>
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
