Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 0 latency dynamics plugin list
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 0 latency dynamics plugin list [message #58531 is a reply to message #58528] |
Tue, 27 September 2005 03:52   |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t was to patch the preamps directly to the deck, then
>>>>send
>>>>the returns to 8 paris inputs and record them. Sounded great. I also
>>>>striped
>>>>a smpte track to tape and sync'ed Paris to the deck using my old Opcode
>>>>Studio 64XTC. If you've got a box with this capability, you'd be goodto
>>>
>>>go
>>>
>>>>if you just wanted to lock Paris to the deck. I just didn't like losing
>>>
>>>a
>>>
>>>>track to the stripe and actually it worked better, IMO, just to track
>>>>the
>>>>tape returns because I wasn't losing a generation every time I played
>>>>back
>>>>the tape afterwards.
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:43526a05$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>My old 1" 16 keeps staring at me from the corner of my control room.
>>>>>
>>>>>I keep wonderiing if I should be tracking drums and bass on it then
>>>>
>>>>bouncing
>>>>
>>>>>in to Paris..
>>>>>
>>>>>Is anyone else doing that here?
>>>>>
>>>>>My problem is my old board is gone. I would need to use Paris as a
>>>>>monitor
>>>>>portion of a console. I think I'd need to send my pre amps in to tape,
>>>>
>>>>open
>>>>
>>>>>a Paris project and send the outs of the tape machine there, and send
>>>
>>>that
>>>
>>>>>to the musicians as a monitor, I wonder if there will be too much
>>>>>latency
>>>>>and it would screw with perfomances. It seems like this should work
>>>>
>>>>though.
>>>>
>>>>>Then right after the take, roll it back, hit record on paris, and play
>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>>>tape into paris.
>>>>>
>>>>>Rewind and record over that take for the next song.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does this sound like it's worth the effort?
>>>>
>>>>
>>"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>Off the top of my head, I would say yes.
>You're processing 2 files, (dual mono), 2 plugins, as opposed to one stereo
>file and one plugin.
OK, I'll try re-doing some L/R tracks into stereo interleaved
tracks & report back if I notice a difference in CPU usage.
NeilInterestingly enough, I was shooting a story on an older producer (Peter
Dawkins), that was around in my days as a "music engineer", (24 tk Studers
and the like), who had to stop in the mid 80's due to Parkinson taking hold.
This guy was one of Australias top, (if not THE top), music engineers of the
time.
To make a long story short, he has come through the Parkinsons now, (ground
breaking surgery), and is back producing..in the digital realm, (and
enjoying it), but...he records the old way...multitracking
guitars..octaves..all the type of stuff we all did back in the 80's, without
the luxury of heaps of tracks and cut and paste.
He and Richard Lush , (Seargent Peppers and onwards at Abbey Road) along
with Peters son (to show the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 0 latency dynamics plugin list [message #58544 is a reply to message #58531] |
Tue, 27 September 2005 19:48 |
zmora
Messages: 88
Registered: August 2005
|
Member |
|
|
wn with Rupert and discuss how he gets it to do this! :-)
>>
>>David.
>>
>
>Well, we both agree about what happens to tape. We just disagree about how
>much of an issue it is and over what period of time.
>Last year, concerned about saving some old 2” tapes, I finally converted
>them to digital. Most were 15 years old or older. The tapes that were well
>recorded 20 years ago still sounded good. I didn’t bake them or anything.
>Just a few passes back and forth before I did the transfers. I didn’t even
>see any obvious flaking. Ironically, most of my old DAT tapes are useless.
>I hope CDR and DVD longevity is better.
>
>The Portico is interesting. If it works as promised, it implies that much
>of the “tape sound” is actually from over saturating the record head as
opposed
>to saturating the tape. That would stand everything I was ever told on its
>head if it’s true.
>Gene
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>this is getting interesting.
>If this is true, you could mae a 2 buss unit that was just sort of a stereo
>record head.
>Insert it at mixdown and hit it hard.
>
http://www.rupertneve.com/portico5042.html
I am theorizing about the effect. I have not heard anyone claim what I suspect.
GeneOh, sorry, I thought it was included in the mic pre.
Didn;t know it was a seperate unit.
Gene,you can talk him into sending you one I'd bet.
"gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>this is getting interesting.
>>If this is true, you could mae a 2 buss unit that was just sort of a stereo
>>record head.
>>Insert it at mixdown and hit it hard.
>>
>http://www.rupertneve.com/portico5042.html
>I am theorizing about the effect. I have not heard anyone claim what I suspect.
>Gene
>I could not help but note that ID takes longer and longer to actually get
back to purchasers requesting unlock codes with the passing of time - which
is expected and a natural progression of events.
This could be a way to push the inevitable end of product support into something
more kind for end users.
-------------------
Something you need cracked? Tell the Copyright Office
8 October 2005 18:50 by Dela
The U.S. Copyright Office is conducting a periodic review of anti-cracking
provisions set in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and is seeking
feedback from the public on what you would like to see cracked and why. If
there is a genuine reason why you think something should be allowed to he
cracked, the office might just allow it. Congress mandated that the register
of Copyrights revisit the anti-circumvention section every three years to
ensure that consumers have proper access to things they have purchased.
Last time around, the office allowed the bypassing of copy protection on
computer games available only in obsolete formats, cracking ebooks copy protection
so that blind people can use software to read it out, cracking of web filtering
software to view the list of blocked sites and cracking computer programs
protected by a "dongle" that is malfunctioning. The office will take written
submissions through December 1st and will accept rebuttals until February
2nd 2006.
After this time has passed, beginning in April the office will hold two sets
of hearings. Basically, if the copyright office can be convinced that something
copy protected prevents fair use of the work, then it might allow the copy
protection to be circumvented legally. "I suspect that we will hear shortly
from people who feel they have not been able to use copyrighted materials
because of the DMCA," said Ralph Oman, an intellectual property attorney
and former register of copyrights.
Source:
Wired
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: 0 latency dynamics plugin list [message #58558 is a reply to message #58543] |
Wed, 28 September 2005 07:04 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
solution.
Deej
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:43544510$1@linux...
> Swen is trying to send and return Paris digital info via the SPDIF jacks
to
> the Kurzweil AES/EBU jacks. He's using XLR (AES/EBU) to SPDIF cables
> specified by Kurzweil and endorsed by several online bigshots. No go.
>
> The cables are 6 feet long, which is supposedly the outside edge for this
> sort of thing. Maybe the cables should be shorter? Four feet?
>
> He's clocking the KSP8 and Paris to a Lucid clock via BNC with no
problems.
> Just no signal transfer on the digital buss.
>
> I, however, am enjoying perfect signal transfer between my Paris rig and
my
> Kurzweil Rumour and Mangler, via SPDIF, through my new Digipatch, which is
> an excellent piece of kit. Awesome setup. Zero latency, perfect clarity,
> infinite patchability of several FX boxes across three MEC/submixes.
Thanks,
> Deej!
>
> Next I'll try to chain multiple FX boxes in the Digipatch. That's where
the
> sweet stuff is, IMO, when you have chained FX pulsing and percolating in
> series. Groovy, baby.
>
> Awesome for me, headache for Swen. If anyone knows about that cabling
thing
> (versus a dedicated digital translation device), let me know...
>
> Jimmy
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:43542d25@linux...
> > The adat card can send and receive digital info. It can only send sync.
It
> > cannot slave to ADAT sync from another device. It's a control freak.
> >
> > ;o)
> >
> > "uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:4353d772$1@linux...
> > > So one ADAT card can't send and receive? Just one or the other?
> > >
> > > And wouldn't it be 24 bit, not 20 bit?
> > >
> > > Hmmm....
> > >
> > > Jimmy
> > >
> > >
> > > "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
> > > news:4353d669$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 0 latency dynamics plugin list [message #58647 is a reply to message #58646] |
Fri, 30 September 2005 06:47 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
3D2>Painstaking I would say. I know =
>it took him=20
>at least a day or so.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>Next thing you know, we're gonna be finding out that Ohura was really a
dude.
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8qq3m19p1sb81rg7gq6212pqkkjnjrunhl@4ax.com...
> i knew it, from the way he was always checkin' out kirks' phaser...
>
>
> On 28 Oct 2005 12:17:54 +1000, "AA" <no@spam.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >LOS ANGELES (AP) - George Takei, best known for his role as Mr. Sulu in
"Star
> >Trek," came out as homosexual in the current issue of a magazine covering
> >the Los Angeles gay and lesbian community. Takei told The Associated
Press
> >on Thursday that his new onstage role as psychologist Martin Dysart in
"Equus,"
> >helped inspire him to publicly discuss his sexuality.
> >Takei described the character as a "very contained but turbulently
frustrated
> >man." The play opened Wednesday at the David Henry Hwang Theater in Los
Angeles,
> >the same day that Frontiers magazine featured a story on Takei's coming
out.
> >The current social and political climate also motivated Takei's
disclosure,
> >he said.
> >"The world has changed from when I was a young teen feeling ashamed for
being
> >gay," he said. "The issue of gay marriage is now a pol
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 0 latency dynamics plugin list [message #58658 is a reply to message #58517] |
Fri, 30 September 2005 16:19 |
thesandbox
Messages: 12
Registered: March 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
xcept
>>> for Adrian (till now) has showed so much interest to help us ,Paris
>>> users.
>>> I wanna convince him make an automatic LATENCY compensator for VST plugins
>>> which I think would be great if succeeded.
>>> Believe me if only two-three Paris users will sign this I will be having
>>> no guts to ask him that or anything else.
>>> This plugin sells for 49 $ only...
>>> Please respond with signing also.
>>> With regards,
>>> Dimitrios
>>
>Hey Dimitrios,
I think he was joking, it was a pun at Brandon's wording of "I will buy Dimitrios"
Meaning he will purchase you, Dimitrios, with cash money, not anything to do with wormhole..
Cheers,
TC
Dimitrios wrote:
> Dear Rick,
> I am really dissapointed in your post.
> If you don't care buying thats ok but saying that it is slavery to buy something
> that is so innovative for Paris and not only and considering the som many
> hours spent to make things smooth for Paris and wormhole as much as possible
> without me being involved at all in the sales of this plugin that really
> makes me feel sad.
> I was hoping that you at least would appreciatte all the efoorts here and
> that wouild be supporting those nice and cheap plugins that help Paris .
> I see people here payinmg 250 $ for a single adat card so for 3 adat cards
> 750 $.
> plus a Mec 150$ almost a 1000 $ to just have 24 adat 20 bit tracks from one
> PC to another.
> Now a simple plugin lets you have 24 bit (or 32bit floating until you use
> Paris dsp ) of 24 audio tracks for a nor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 06 18:17:44 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.69415 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
