The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » dual processors
dual processors [message #61915] Tue, 27 December 2005 06:57 Go to next message
Nathan Johnson is currently offline  Nathan Johnson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 3
Registered: December 2005
Junior Member

>> Pressing solo on the Mackie controller results in the tracks being instantly
>>soloed, but on the US2400 there is about a 1 second lag where you hear
the
>>other channels quickly fade out. If I had to guess, the Mackie sends a
>“solo
>>channel” command to the software, where the US2400 internally processes
>the
>>solo button as mutes for all the non-soloed tracks, where as it sends out
>>a “mute all the other channels” command. This is just speculation though.
>>
>>The end-game for me is that I am keeping the US2400, selling my Mackie,
>buying
>>some drafting tape, and getting ready to rock. If anyone is interested
>in
>>my Mackie controller, I will sell it for less than the latest going rate.
>> Contact me at christopherwargo *at> hot<8>mail
>>
>>-Chris
Re: dual processors [message #61917 is a reply to message #61915] Tue, 27 December 2005 07:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
e it
and bring it into Paris for audio and mixing?Anyone doing this?

THanks,
PeteHey (new) Mommy!!! Happy New Year!! How's the baby and hubby? I hope all is
well.
LaMont

Michele Hobbs <michelehobbs@comcast.net> wrote:
>They're still not porting to the Windows platform. I don't think you'll

>be able to open XP and run Digital Performer. They're porting to run on

>Intel hardware...big difference.
>
>-Michele Hobbs
>
>
>
>LaMont wrote:
>> What other choice do they have? Motu has hedged their life on Apple. they
>> have to try and keep up as best as possible.
>>
>> It's funny, a company that is sworn to not port over it's Digital Performer
>> over to the ewindows platform is actually doing just that..
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/MOTU-Intel-Mac-Dri vers.html
>>
>>Oh, wait...you used your real name....never
Re: dual processors [message #61919 is a reply to message #61917] Tue, 27 December 2005 09:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nathan Johnson is currently offline  Nathan Johnson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 3
Registered: December 2005
Junior Member

>>>
>>>It's funny, a company that is sworn to not port over it's Digital Performer
>>>over to the ewindows platform is actually doing just that..
>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: dual processors [message #61922 is a reply to message #61919] Tue, 27 December 2005 10:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
audioguy_editout_ is currently offline  audioguy_editout_   CANADA
Messages: 249
Registered: December 2005
Senior Member
s wouldn't have anything to list as a new

>feature if they didn't have a XP64 version of their app...doh
>
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>
>> I agree, people should wait to see how things go for a bit.
>>
>> James
>>
>> Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>Everyone will be a beta tester for the MAC/Intel change for quite awhile
>>
>>
>>>to come in both the software and hardware world. The majority of the
>>>software companies I see didn't even have most of their major bugs
>>>worked out for the current hardware. I wish all the MAC guys the best
of
>>
>>
>>>luck on this. Windows folks will be going through a similar experience

>>>when Vista becomes ready for prime time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Chris
>>>
Re: dual processors [message #61923 is a reply to message #61922] Tue, 27 December 2005 11:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nathan Johnson is currently offline  Nathan Johnson   UNITED STATES
Messages: 3
Registered: December 2005
Junior Member
;
>>>
>>>John wrote:
>>>
>>>>Be careful though. I hope they get it right but if you don't want to
>>
>> be
>>
>>>>a beta tester you might wait 6 months.
>>>>John
>>>>
>>>>James McCloskey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/MOTU-Intel-Mac-Dri vers.html
>>>
>>>--
>>>Chris Ludwig
>>>ADK
>>>chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>>>www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>>(859) 635-5762
>
>--
>Chris Ludwig
>ADK
>chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>(859) 635-5762Hey Michele! Congratulations on the new baby!

James


Michele Hobbs <michelehobbs@comcast.net> wrote:
>Hey LaMont, thanks for askin'!
>
>Wow, I haven't posted here in awhile. I should probably let everyone
>know that I had my first child, a baby boy named Cedric, on Nov. 11.
>Everyone is fine. Tired, but fine. Kids are great! Now, if I could
>just make my way back downstairs to my gear...
>
>
>Stickin' with my "old" G5 for now,
>-Michele Hobbs
>
>
>
>LaMont wrote:
>
>> Hey (new) Mommy!!! Happy New Year!! How's the baby and hubby? I hope all
is
>> well.
>> LaMont
>>
>> Michele Hobbs <michelehobbs@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>They're still not
Re: dual processors [message #61924 is a reply to message #61923] Tue, 27 December 2005 11:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
audioguy_editout_ is currently offline  audioguy_editout_   CANADA
Messages: 249
Registered: December 2005
Senior Member
porting to the Windows platform. I don't think you'll
>>
>>
>>>be able to open XP and run Digital Performer. They're porting to run
on
>>
>>
>>>Intel hardware...big difference.
>>>
>>>-Michele Hobbs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>LaMont wrote:
>>>
>>>>What other choice do they have? Motu has hedged their life on Apple.
they
>>>>have to try and keep up as best as possible.
>>>>
>>>>It's funny, a company that is sworn to not port over it's Digital Performer
>>>>over to the ewindows platform is actually doing just that..
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/MOTU-Intel-Mac-Dri vers.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>Yes! you can use Paris and Cubase on the same PC at the same time!! all you
need to have is another sound-card for Cubase.
I've been using Paris and Cubase for years without probs.

Hope it helps
Jorsi

"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:43c69535$1@linux...
>
> So is anyone doing this.I'm assuming on the same computer you
> couldn't run them at the same time;although I remember running
> Studio Vision synced to Paris on the same comp back in the day.
>
> I'm wanting to get more midi and vsti stuff happening,but at
> this point I don't want to spend the buck on an extra computer
> and interface it with my Paris comp.I don't want to venture into
> DJ LAND(echo,echo,echo) ;)I love ya Deej and all,but don't want
> to deal with all that right now.
>
> So could I get some stuff happening in Cubase then bounce it
> and bring it into Paris for audio and mixing?Anyone doing this?
>
> THanks,
> PeteI did this for several years, as did many others... I ran Cubase out
to an RME card slaved to incoming ADAT timecode from Paris... Worked
okay for a while -- and this was on an 800Mhz Athlon with maybe 256
RAM... I'm sure you could work something out -- you'll need an extra
soundcard in there, obviously... I mean, something other than Paris.
Then you pipe the output back to your MEC in whatever form --S'Pdif,
adat, analogue, whatever -- for monitoring in Paris. I never tried
this on one computer under XP, by the way. Probably would be at least
as good or better. My set-up now is Paris on 98SE sending ADAT sync
to another computer running Cubase SX3 (under XP, of course)... Works
okay for my needs these days.

Short answer is -- yes. (but the long answer is at least...
longer...)

-- good luck -- Chas


On 13 Jan 2006 04:43:17 +1000, "Pete
Re: dual processors [message #61926 is a reply to message #61917] Tue, 27 December 2005 14:49 Go to previous message
Mike Audet is currently offline  Mike Audet
Messages: 294
Registered: December 2008
Senior Member
ght now.
>
> So could I get some stuff happening in Cubase then bounce it
>and bring it into Paris for audio and mixing?Anyone doing this?
>
>THanks,
>PeteHey Jorsi,cool.How are you using it?Are you doing midi type stuff
in Cubase synched to Paris.Doing any VTSi stuff?UAD-1 at all in
Cubase?

I guess its all relative as to what you can and can't do and
would just require some experimentation as far as the number of
VSTi plugs and effects plugs that can be run.

Thanks for the info,
Pete
"Jorsi" <studios@greennet.gl> wrote:
>Yes! you can use Paris and Cubase on the same PC at the same time!! all
you
>need to have is another sound-card for Cubase.
>I've been using Paris and Cubase for years without probs.
>
>Hope it helps
>Jorsi
>
>"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>news:43c69535$1@linux...
>>
>> So is anyone doing this.I'm assuming on the same computer you
>> couldn't run them at the same time;although I remember running
>> Studio Vision synced to Paris on the same comp back in the day.
>>
>> I'm wanting to get more midi and vsti stuff happening,but at
>> this point I don't want to spend the buck on an extra computer
>> and interface it with my Paris comp.I don't want to venture into
>> DJ LAND(echo,echo,echo) ;)I love ya Deej and all,but don't want
>> to deal with all that right now.
>>
>> So could I get some stuff happening in Cubase then bounce it
>> and bring it into Paris for audio and mixing?Anyone doing this?
>>
>> THanks,
>> Pete
>
>The good thing about paris is that it does not need much of the cpu unless
you are using a lot of plug-ins,
Previous Topic: VSTi 's and/or VSTi hosts-Opinions please
Next Topic: Christmas Trumpets (not)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 12 00:43:37 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13259 seconds