The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Projects » Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project?
Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106084] Sun, 13 March 2011 09:21 Go to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member

Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project?[ 23 votes ]
1. Yes, I want a motorized C-16 for use with only PARIS. 6 / 26%
2. Yes, I want a motorized c-16 for use with all my software including PARIS. 17 / 74%
3. No, I don't want a motorized fader control. 0 / 0%

No Message Body

[Updated on: Sun, 13 March 2011 09:23]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106085 is a reply to message #106084] Sun, 13 March 2011 10:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
thesandbox1 is currently offline  thesandbox1   UNITED STATES
Messages: 167
Registered: July 2009
Location: Carmel, IN
Senior Member
No Message Body

[Updated on: Sun, 13 March 2011 10:12]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106089 is a reply to message #106084] Sun, 13 March 2011 13:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ted Gerber is currently offline  Ted Gerber   CANADA
Messages: 705
Registered: January 2009
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106092 is a reply to message #106085] Sun, 13 March 2011 13:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dnafe is currently offline  dnafe   CANADA
Messages: 390
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106101 is a reply to message #106092] Sun, 13 March 2011 18:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106117 is a reply to message #106101] Tue, 15 March 2011 05:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ted Gerber is currently offline  Ted Gerber   CANADA
Messages: 705
Registered: January 2009
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106124 is a reply to message #106117] Tue, 15 March 2011 14:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dnafe is currently offline  dnafe   CANADA
Messages: 390
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106126 is a reply to message #106124] Tue, 15 March 2011 14:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106131 is a reply to message #106126] Tue, 15 March 2011 15:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerryg is currently offline  kerryg   CANADA
Messages: 1529
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
Administrator
No Message Body

"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106136 is a reply to message #106131] Tue, 15 March 2011 20:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106137 is a reply to message #106136] Wed, 16 March 2011 05:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
drfrankencopter is currently offline  drfrankencopter   CANADA
Messages: 137
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106409 is a reply to message #106126] Sun, 15 May 2011 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
uptown jimmy is currently offline  uptown jimmy   UNITED STATES
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106412 is a reply to message #106409] Sun, 15 May 2011 18:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106413 is a reply to message #106412] Sun, 15 May 2011 18:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
uptown jimmy is currently offline  uptown jimmy   UNITED STATES
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #106517 is a reply to message #106084] Mon, 13 June 2011 23:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
hungaristan is currently offline  hungaristan   
Messages: 32
Registered: December 2009
Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #107805 is a reply to message #106084] Thu, 11 July 2013 01:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
harry e is currently offline  harry e   UNITED STATES
Messages: 18
Registered: August 2010
Location: palo alto, california
Junior Member
No Message Body

harry kenneth epstein
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108037 is a reply to message #107805] Tue, 14 January 2014 09:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
No Message Body
Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108039 is a reply to message #108037] Tue, 14 January 2014 10:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
No Message Body

[Updated on: Tue, 14 January 2014 16:06]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108040 is a reply to message #108039] Tue, 14 January 2014 11:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
No Message Body

Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108396 is a reply to message #106084] Sat, 13 September 2014 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
harry e is currently offline  harry e   UNITED STATES
Messages: 18
Registered: August 2010
Location: palo alto, california
Junior Member
No Message Body

harry kenneth epstein
icon14.gif  Re: Should I resurrect the motorized fader C-16 replacement project? [message #108459 is a reply to message #106084] Mon, 10 November 2014 14:18 Go to previous message
officialmy is currently offline  officialmy   CANADA
Messages: 4
Registered: October 2014
Location: Canada
Junior Member

No Message Body

MY
Music Producer-Mix Engineer-Entrepreneur

[Updated on: Mon, 10 November 2014 14:19]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Reverse engineering the MEC expansion cards...
Next Topic: paris recording
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 05 09:39:09 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00710 seconds