Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » NS10s - how sweet it is....
| NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72432] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 04:31  |
![mike audet[1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "mike audet[1] is currently offline")
mike audet[1]
Messages: 129
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA3Ai5QACAAQAA AAMAAwAAAFgA
AIAOAAAAQAAAgBAAAAAoAACAAAAAANwIuUAAgAEAAAABAAEAAABwAACAAAAA ANwIuUAAgAEA
AAABAAEAAACIAACAAAAAANwIuUAAgAEAAAABADF1AACgAACAAAAAANwIuUAA gAEAAAABAAkE
AAC4AAAAAAAAANwIuUAAgAEAAAABAAAAAADIAAAAAAAAANwIuUAAgAEAAAAB AAAAAADYAAAA
8JABAJQDAACwBAAAAAAAAISUAQAUAAAAsAQAAAAAAACYlAEA6AIAALAEAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AACUAzQAAABWAFMAXwBWAEUAUgBTAEkATwBOAF8ASQBOAEYATwAAAAAAvQTv /gAAAQABAAIA
BgAAAAEAAgAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEQAAAAA AFYAYQByAEYA
aQBsAGUASQBuAGYAbwAAAAAAJAAEAAAAVAByAGEAbgBzAGwAYQB0AGkAbwBu
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72436 is a reply to message #72432] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 07:04  |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nk"> http://cgi.ebay.com/NEUMANN-32-A-LATHE-WITH-FAIRCHILD-PLATTE R-NEUMANN_W0QQit
>emZ290034697305QQihZ019QQcategoryZ3278QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>Tony -
I downloaded the tracks and played around with them a little, but
never really got back into it. Someday, I will have time and "monkey"
around with these tracks more earnestly. Kudos to Peter and Real World
Studios for releasing these tracks.
Since these are the raw tracks, I am not too surprised with their
quality. I know my recordings start with pretty dull sounding tracks
that then get polishing in the mixdown process. Of course, the
difference between PG and me is that he is polishing gold nuggets,
whereas I am polishing, well, you know what!
- Paul Artola
Ellicott City, Maryland
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:13:35 -0500, "Tony Bens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72481 is a reply to message #72467] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 21:52 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
@linux..." target="_blank">451eaefd@linux...
>> > Hmmm..........Win XP I'm assuming. Try inserting the ADAT cards in
>> > different
>> > slots-preferably the #1 slots. I actually had 2 x ADAT cards working in
>> > MEC
>> > #1 and a single ADAT card working in MECs 2 & 3 back when I was running
>> > Paris on XP. The ADAT cards were in the first two MEC slots on the MEC
> on
>> > card A and in the first slot on the MECs on Cards B & C.
>> >
>> > Deej
>> >
>> >
>> > "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:451eadce$1@linux...
>> >> 2 MECs with one ADAT module per MEC
>> >>
>> >> D
>> >>
>> >> "DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:451ea7e4@linux...
>> >> > 18/12 is an ADAT module error IIRC. Are you running Paris on Win XP?
> If
>> >> > so,
>> >> > do you have more than one ADAT module "per MEC'? If this is the
>> >> > case,
>> > this
>> >> > is the problem. If you've only got one ADAT module, make sure it's
>> >> > in
>> > the
>> >> > MEC attached to Card A.
>> >> >
>> >> > Deej
>> >> >
>> >> > "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72484 is a reply to message #72483] |
Fri, 15 September 2006 22:41 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>
>>>>>>>>>"Kim W." <no-one@home.y'know> wrote in message news:451cddee$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, Kim.
>>>>>>>>>> At four in the morning, I didn't tweak to the fact that Deej
>>>>>>>>>> thought I was you, or you me....
>>>>>>>>>> Hope the new job is going well.
>>>>>>>>>> The other Kim
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Was just reading a post from you Deej where you referred to Kim
>>>W
>>>>>as
>>>>>>>>"Oh
>>>>>>>>>> >Moderating one". ;o) I assume you mean me... ;o)
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Kim W is also Australian, but he kindly signs off Kim W to differentiate
>>>>>>>>>> >between himself and I because I lazily simply call myself Kim.
>>:o)
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >I'm Kim S, was I to add an initial...
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> >Kim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>BTW, I'm off to the store for a while. B'back in about 3 hours. One
suggestion before I go. If this configuration doesn't work right out of the
chute, save your fxvar file (so your EDS presets are preserved), uninstall
and reinstall Paris so that the first configuration the new install sees is
this one. IIRC, that's something I had to do, but Paris on XP can be quirky
sometimes. I think Mic Cross had 2 x ADAT modules working in each of 4 X
MECS........Brian T. also. I couldn't get this working.......but then again,
those guys are smart.
;o)
Deej
"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote in message news:451eb26c$1@linux...
> That the exact config that worked for me.
>
> good luck
>
> Deej
>
> "Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:451eb0c1$1@linux...
> > Ok...I'll swap out the Modules in MEC A so that it is
> >
> > Slot 1) ADAT
> > Slot 2) 8 in
> > Slot 3) 8 out
> >
> > I'll get back to you when that is done...1/2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72491 is a reply to message #72477] |
Sat, 16 September 2006 05:24 |
Rich Lamanna
Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
like me too, only more interesting
>indeed.
Hehe I'd forgotten I put that in there. I guess I should put some proper
influences in there too... ...though I'm not entirely sure how my influences
are for this project.
Thanks for the comments. Appreciated.
Cheers,
Kim."Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
I just noticed that was the only one not enabled for download. Were you trying
to download or play it off the site?
I've enabled it for download anyhow if you wanted a listen...
Cheers,
Kim.You're probably right that Logic lost some users when the program went
Mac-only. OTOH, some folks switched to OSX and learned to appreciate the
change.
For my part I had zero interest in Logic until it went to OSX. So from
my perspective, dropping MSWindows support was a non-issue.
Seriously, the Mac is no deserted Island. Programs that run on OSX are
useful tools in a usable and reasonably advanced environment. Programs
that run on Linux or MSWindows can be useful tools, too. Use what you
prefer.
I've never lost any sleep fretting over what this or that other studio
uses. I use whatever fits my needs, preferences and budget. Right now
that's Logic on OSX (along with some other stuff), in the past it has
been other programs on other systems. In the future it may be something
else. It's not about blindly following, I evaluate and choose for myself.
Having been watching this industry for more than a few years, I can tell
you that every product comes with a "but." I hate to break it to you but
there is no perfect product. :^)
It's up to each of us to determine if a particular product does what we
need. If you have specific questions about Logic or OSX, feel free to
ask and I'll try to answer based on what I d
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72513 is a reply to message #72491] |
Sat, 16 September 2006 17:07 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>LaMont wrote:
>>> Hey Jamie good points. I think most if not all former users wnat Logic
>Audio
>>> to survive. I certainly do, But, :) we want on our terms. we like apps
>that
>>> we run on both platforms. That way, should one platform oushines the
other,
>>> no problem, just get the CD/DVD out and load away:)
>>>
>>> Seriously, I don;t know is on the minds of Emagic and their love affair
>with
>>> that very dated interface, AND audio editing.. What Gives!!! If Apple
>can
>>> develope a great audio editor in Soundrack Pro, WHY NOT LOGIC!!.. I think
>>> that one feature item is what really keeping folks from forking over
the
>>> Bucks for a Mac, then logic audio. Do they (emagic) know how to implement
>>> an modern audioeditor?? OR , are so arrogant, that just continue to snub
>>> their noses to anybody who keeps suggesting that their interface looks
>like
>>> a dated science project. Even their fellow one time German Daw partner,
>Magix
>>> (Samplitude & Sequioa) have implemented mixer skins that are visually
>appealing.Giveing
>>> their apps a pro look. Looks count. Okay, I digress. It just sickens
me
>to
>>> know end as to why they (Apple-Emagic) won't take the bull (Digedesign)
>by
>>> the horns and bring out -once and for all.A Complete-Re-write of Logic
>Audio.
>>> New interface, New Audio engine, new audio editor..very polished..????
>Is
>>> that too much to ask??? Sheeeshhhh..
>>> They have Apogee, now, give us (hosessitting on the fence) a reason to
>fork
>>> over 900.00 bucks.. I's their call..
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, Pre-orders of Cubase4 and Sonar 6 are on steroids. And with
>a
>>> new rumor of a new PLE & M-powered on the horizon, Apple, is starting
>to
>>> look like the minor leagues of Pro Audio, when they were expected to
become
>>> THE PRO-Tools Killer!!!
>>> What happend??
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>> You're probably right that Logic lost some users when the program went
>
>>>> Mac-only. OTO
|
|
|
|
| Re: NS10s - how sweet it is.... [message #72574 is a reply to message #72491] |
Sun, 17 September 2006 17:01 |
uptown jimmy
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
y subjective
>matter. To each his own.
>
>There is a lot of software out there to choose from, I'm glad we have choices,
>other wise we'd all sound the same.
>
>Just be glad Gibson didn't buy Logic!!!
>
>James
>
>
>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>Hey James - are you using Logic with Symphony? How do you like Symphony
>-
>>thoughts? Seems like a great interface and a perfect complement to Logic,
>>but I know a few people were skeptical of Apogee's ability to deliver the
>>driver end, if there is such a concern with core audio.
>>
>>Dedric
>>
>>On 10/1/06 5:39 PM, in article 452051c3$1@linux, "James McCloskey"
>><excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apple is a fortune 50 company with billions of dollars behind it. I
don't
>>> think Apple or Logic are going to fail any time soon. Logic will, and
>has
>>> improved over time. Apple could make more money if they had a PC version
>>> again, but it doesn't much matter to Mac users and their are millions
>of
>>> us. I think the biggest problem with Logic is the $999.00 price, if
it
>were
>>> $499.00, and continued to improve, a lot more people would be using it.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no perfect DAW, they all need work. Is Nuendo $1,500.00 better
>>> than Logic? Before you answer that, maybe you should try the latest
version
>>> of Logic on a new Mac with Symphony. Then I think you would really know.
>>> Logic 5.5 is a vary old version. It's all subjective, different strokes
>>> for different fokes. Jamie and others here are examples of people that
>really
>>> like Logic and are able to do serious work with Logic, so I don't think
>it's
>>> dyeing. Logic and Apple are only going to get better with time. By
the
>>> way Logic and SoundTrack are supposed to work together, like Vegas and
>Acid.
>>>
>>> Hey, it's always good to have choices.
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 05 22:40:20 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.34717 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
