The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW [message #63083]

Sun, 15 January 2006 00:31

LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005

Senior Member

nd you start getting this wierd
>warbling/pulsing tone through your reference monitors.....then by all means,
>use a 7 meter WC cable. You could probably reamp this racket and time
>stretch it to use as a techno loop.
>
>;oP
>
>One possible solution to this would be Systemlink, I think. Use the acards
in a separate DAW to minimize the hit to the PCI bus of the workstation
performing playback......at least in theory.

I'm pretty much SOL once my UAD resources exceed 40%, no matter what PCI
latency I use.......and I've got another DAW just sitting here.......and AMD
XP 3000 CPU with 2G PC2700 DDR nd a system drive. All I need is a case, PSU,
a sound card and VStack. I have configured this machine in the past with 3 x
UAD-1 cards in the PCI slots without issue. Since there ar 6 PCI slots and
one of them was holding my Magma host cards, I doubt if I would nave much
problem running 4 x UAD cards. I just wonder if the PCI latency would be an
issue on this machine under heavy plugin loads also, even though it wouldn't
be hosting a playback application(unlessVstack could be considered a
playback app)

"gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:43e37f0c$1@linux...
>
> Many people with multiple UAD-1 cards in Magma systems have reported
similar
> issues. Magma is planning to release a PCI Express converter card that
will
> allow your system to run from a PCI-E slot in the near future. This,
combined
> with tweaking PCI latency settings, may help. I think it's time for a new
> card from UA.
> g
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >I'm just having such a gret time in *nativeville* these days. So much to
> >learn. I've been getting crackling inmy audio when streaming tracks from
> >Cubase to Paris when using large numbers of UAD-1 plugins. Well, come to
> >find out, there's more fun to be had in tweakville......
> >
> >Here's some info on PCI latency.
> >
> >http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Oct04/articles/pcnotes.htm
> >
> >http://www.uaudio.com/webzine/2005/june/index5.html
> >
> >http://mark-knutson.com/t3/
> >
> >http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=951
> >
> >From what I can determine from reading a few threads about this, PCI
latency
> >is the amount of "wait" time PCI is allocated to communicate with any
given
> >peripheral. A high PCI Latency setting takes more PCI bus time than
another
> >device with a lower setting. Normally, the PCI Latency Timer is set to 32
> >cycles. This means the active PCI device has to complete its transactions
> >within 32 clock cycles or hand it over to the next PCI device. As you can
> >see, a device, like a video card which has a setting of 248 essentially
> >"hogs" the PCI Bus.
> >
> >PCI latency timers are a mechanism for PCI bus-mastering devices to share
> >the PCI bus fairly. A dev

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 00:31
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Jamie K on Sun, 15 January 2006 00:55
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 10:08
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Jamie K on Sun, 15 January 2006 10:12
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 11:34
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Jamie K on Sun, 15 January 2006 12:48
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: emarenot on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:00
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:14
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Deej on Sun, 15 January 2006 21:45
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 15 January 2006 21:08
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 22:22
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Deej on Sun, 15 January 2006 23:10
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Mon, 16 January 2006 00:13
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Mon, 16 January 2006 09:07
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Mon, 16 January 2006 08:49
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Mon, 16 January 2006 11:33
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Chris Wargo on Mon, 16 January 2006 12:06
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: TCB on Mon, 16 January 2006 14:03
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Tony Benson on Mon, 16 January 2006 13:36
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: TCB on Mon, 16 January 2006 18:57
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Tony Benson on Mon, 16 January 2006 21:17
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Mon, 16 January 2006 20:25
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Tue, 17 January 2006 11:27
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: TCB on Tue, 17 January 2006 13:33
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Tue, 17 January 2006 12:45
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Tue, 17 January 2006 19:45
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Mon, 16 January 2006 08:57
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Deej [1] on Sun, 15 January 2006 22:04
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Chris Wargo on Sun, 15 January 2006 12:03
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 13:53
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Chris Wargo on Sun, 15 January 2006 16:16
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 15 January 2006 15:37
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:28
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:19
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: TC on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:31
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Chris Wargo on Sun, 15 January 2006 21:04
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 21:20
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Michele Hobbs on Sun, 15 January 2006 01:08
		Re: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Deej [1] on Sun, 15 January 2006 01:11
		Re: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 09:55
		Re: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Bill Lorentzen on Sun, 15 January 2006 07:06
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 15 January 2006 09:03
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 10:22
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 15 January 2006 13:18
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:51
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Dedric Terry on Sun, 15 January 2006 19:46
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 21:30
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: TCB on Sun, 15 January 2006 15:04
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Sun, 15 January 2006 20:08
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: Music Lab Sweden on Mon, 16 January 2006 03:08
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: LaMont on Mon, 16 January 2006 09:10
		Re: OT: Not Since Paris, There Has been no Pro (Mid) DSPDAW By: excelav on Mon, 16 January 2006 18:29

Previous Topic:	OK, I have a reverb question...
Next Topic:	Drums!!!!!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed May 06 22:23:43 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00857 seconds