Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » The Big Picture
| The Big Picture [message #97362] |
Sat, 22 March 2008 17:54  |
![dc[3] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "dc[3] is currently offline")
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>I haven't read every post in your thread, so I apologize if you've already
>tried these things.
>
>Try disabling direct x by manually editing the paris.cfg file by adding
the
>line:
>
>DisableDirectX=1
>
>Make sure that you do not have a default project in your Paris directory.
>
>make sure that your VST directory is pointed to a directory with no VST
plugins
>in it. The following line is in the paris.cfg file:
>
>VSTDirectory=C:\vst\
>
>Make sure that the effects updates, the PACE update, and everything else
>involved in getting PARIS to work in XP has been followed to the letter.
> The only times I have ever gotten an unhanded exception error when starting
>PAR
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97364 is a reply to message #97362] |
Sat, 22 March 2008 18:23  |
Stevehwan
Messages: 207
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
in.com/wayward.htm or
www.cdbaby.com/Sarahtonin or iTunes.
Duane's a real nice feller, so I wanna help him through this rough time if I
can.
That is all. As you were.
Thanks,
Sarah Jane"Warren" <tonetemple@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:484c7274$1@linux...
>
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for that, I haven't tried any of those options. I've been doing
> fresh
> installs each time so the only plugins installed are the default Paris
> ones
> so, unlikely?
> I'll give your suggestions a try and see what happens, after that I've run
> out of options. I do have another version of XP I will try not that I see
> that making any difference.
>
different XP.....I can't see how that'll help. Have you tried to install
only one EDS at a time, and make SURE in the BIOS that it is not sharing an
IRQ with anything else. Kill stuff like USB, modem, COM ports, LPT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97377 is a reply to message #97374] |
Sat, 22 March 2008 22:08 |
Nappy
Messages: 198
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>> appreciated.<BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Davi</BLOCKQUOTE>
>>><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
>>>and=20
>>>you?<BR><A=20
>>>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Aaron,
Have disabled everything in the bios and the EDS cards are not sharing IRQ's.
Different XP .. as you can see I'm at the clutchting at straws stage. I did
install to the default folder - Program Files\EMU etc so, I will give that
a go.
Thanks,
Warren
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
>"Warren" <tonetemple@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:484c7274$1@linux...
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Thanks for that, I haven't tried any of those options. I've been doing
>> fresh
>> installs each time so the only plugins installed are the default Paris
>> ones
>> so, unlikely?
>> I'll give your suggestions a try and see what happens, after that I've
run
>> out of options. I do have another version of XP I will try not that I
see
>> that making any difference.
>>
>
>
>different XP.....I can't see how that'll help. Have you tried to install
>only one EDS at a time, and make SURE in the BIOS that it is not sharing
an
>IRQ with anything else. Kill stuff like USB, modem, COM ports, LPT port.
>Strip it down to the absolute bare necessities. Check the hardware list
once
>you've done this to make sure again that there is no IRQ sharing. if it
is,
>move the EDS to another PCI slot.
>Also, when you install Paris, make it go to C:\Paris and also when putting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97427 is a reply to message #97423] |
Mon, 24 March 2008 15:16 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>>>>>with=20
>>>>> troubleshooting.<BR><BR>Jeff<BR><BR>David Feldman wrote:<BR>> Hi=20
>>>>> there,<BR>> I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right =
>>>>>direction for=20
>>>>> troubleshooting<BR>> an installation problem. I've recently =
>>>>>put a new=20
>>>>> 8-in an 8-out card into<BR>> my MEC, and when I run Paris, they =
>>>>>don't show=20
>>>>> up on the patch bay and I can't<BR>> seem to use them. I'm =
>>>>>wondering=20
>>>>> if there are steps that I am missing here.<BR>> I've looked =
>>>>>in the=20
>>>>> manual and can't find any notes on installing these things<BR>> =
>>>>>into an=20
>>>>> existing MEC. So I'm a little bit lost. Any help would be=20
>>>>> appreciated.<BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Davi</BLOCKQUOTE>
>>>>><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam,
> =
>>>>>and=20
>>>>>you?<BR><A=20
>>>>>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>>>>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>It's possible you have a visual glitch and can't see correctly the segments
that 'should' be touching each other aren't at a splice. I've had this
happen before. Rendering usually handles it. Did you let 17/18 show at any
point on your editor? This can cause just such a 'glitch'. BT said that if
you close and reopen the editor it fixes it.
AA
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:484eafdc$1@linux...
>
> I have recently been experiencing some dropouts on tracks with UAD plugs
> during
> mixing. This hasn't happened before. There are no edits in the tracks in
> question, and the dropouts, when the occur, tend to happen at the same
> place,
> and on the same track, time after tim
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97428 is a reply to message #97424] |
Mon, 24 March 2008 16:05 |
Deej [5]
Messages: 373
Registered: March 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e, assuming I start playback in the
> same place. This sounds like some sort of buffer mishap or something.
> Something
> else is, I've noticed that if I look at the UAD meter, under config, the
> sample rate reads 48k. I'm mixing at 44.1 with bothe Paris AND my Lucid
> word
> clock set at 44.1. If I reboot, this will usuall change back to 44.1 I'm
> running 3 UAD cards and 6 eds cards, all in a magma chassis. UAD version
> 4.9. Anybody had anything like this happen, or any thouoght about
> something
> that I may be missing?
> addendum
> I just tried it again and rendered the bass track ( the one with droputs)
> all the way to the beggining of the piece, so there are no spaces before
> the track starts and there are no dropouts, at least for now. The drop out
> happened at about 19 seconds, consistantly, before I did this.
> errrrrrr!I think you hijacked Ted's thread :)
"Jamie K" <JamieN0-SPAM@JamieKrutzN0-SPAM.com> wrote in message
news:484f4c2c@linux...
>
> What do you guys think of this?
>
> http://www.musicfirstcoalition.org/#/home/
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.comAaron Allen wrote:
> I think you hijacked Ted's thread :)
Sorry Aaron and Ted.
Has this already been discussed?
Or did my question show up in one of Ted's other threads for those
reading on the web site?
I get the group as a newsgroup in my email reader and it's a separate
heading here.
Anyway, on the question of "should radio stations pay performance
rights" it seems to me they should. If internet radio has to pay for
content, why not terrestrial radio?
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
> "Jamie K" <JamieN0-SPAM@JamieKrutzN0-SPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:484f4c2c@linux...
>> What do you guys think of this?
>>
>> Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97434 is a reply to message #97417] |
Tue, 25 March 2008 01:07 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
which only shows 16 ins and 16 outs.
>
> Do you mean to say that each MEC can only run up to two input and output
> modules? If that's the case, then why in the world does the MEC have 9 expansion
> slots? Am I going to have to run a whole extra 4-rack-unit MEC just to use
> my extra modules? Or is there a more efficient workaround that I don't know
> about here? Or am I misunderstanding this completely?
>
> Somebody help explain this to me.
> -David
>
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> To clarify, you can only have 2 input and 2 output modules per MEC, giving
>
>> you 16 ins and 16 outs for each Paris submixer.
>>
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>> news:484c87c8$1@linux...
>>> OOohhhh.. ok. This is a limit. You have to select which modules from the
>
>>> itemized lists in the patch bay on the right hand side. Adat, no matter
>
>>> where in the MEC, will be the first default as I recall. I think this
> has
>>> to do with how Paris does it's hardware inventory. Make sure to scroll
> on
>>> that list, if they aren't there then you have a problem. If they are,
> that
>>> is normal Paris behaviour.
>>>
>>> AA
>>>
>>>
>>> "David Feldman" <dfeldmania@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:484c80cb$1@linux...
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> Thanks for trying to help. Here is some more information that I should
>
>>>> have
>>>> included earlier. I am running Paris 3.0 on Windows ME with three EDS
>
>>>> cards
>>>> installed. My MEC is connected to the first EDS card and that's it.
>
>>>> When
>>>> I run Paris, only 16 ins and outs show up in the modules section of the
>
>>>> patch
>>>> bay. What do you think?
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>> In theory they should just show up in the modules section in
>>>>> the patchbay. Does the Mec master module show up that these
>>>>> new 8 in/outs are installed in?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97438 is a reply to message #97435] |
Tue, 25 March 2008 03:55 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"_blank">jkhoover@excite.com</A>> wrote
> =
>>>>> in message=20
>>>>> <A=20
>>>>> =
>>>>> href=3D"news:484b6746@linux">news:484b6746@linux</A>...</DIV>David,<BR><B=
>>>>> R>What=20
>>>>> version of Paris and what OS? How many EDS cards? If more =
>>>>> than=20
>>>>> <BR>one, what is connected to each?<BR><BR>Just need more info to help
>>>> =
>>>>> with=20
>>>>> troubleshooting.<BR><BR>Jeff<BR><BR>David Feldman wrote:<BR>> Hi=20
>>>>> there,<BR>> I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right =
>>>>> direction for=20
>>>>> troubleshooting<BR>> an installation problem. I've recently =
>>>>> put a new=20
>>>>> 8-in an 8-out card into<BR>> my MEC, and when I run Paris, they =
>>>>> don't show=20
>>>>> up on the patch bay and I can't<BR>> seem to use them. I'm =
>>>>> wondering=20
>>>>> if there are steps that I am missing here.<BR>> I've looked =
>>>>> in the=20
>>>>> manual and can't find any notes on installing these things<BR>> =
>>>>> into an=20
>>>>> existing MEC. So I'm a little bit lost. Any help would be=20
>>>>> appreciated.<BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Davi</BLOCKQUOTE>
>>>>> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam,
> =
>>>>> and=20
>>>>> you?<BR><A=20
>>>>> href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>>>> .html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>Hi Bill,
I'll have a full report - We are planning on Video taping
this as well :)
My Best,
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97444 is a reply to message #97362] |
Tue, 25 March 2008 07:56 |
|
|
64;billlorentzen.com" target="_blank">bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>I've been carrying an amp rack in my PA, so it was no big deal to
>include an Ensoniq DP4, but now that I am using powered cabs I want to
>trim down my rack and I'm looking for a good sounding half rack type
>verb. Do any of the Alesis units sound good? I used to have those old
>Lexicon half racks and they were OK, but not good IMHO.
>
>Any recommendations?This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C8CBCB.D7278470
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Bill,
I've owned LXP 1 LXP 5 and Nanoverb. Nano is good enough for live sound
if it's just a dusting over vocals. It is thin sounding overall.
The LXPs are ok but nothing to write home about. The ddl in the LXP 5 =
with
modulation was very cool for solo guitars.
I'd check out the Behringer stuff as long as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Big Picture [message #97448 is a reply to message #97444] |
Tue, 25 March 2008 09:13 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
k in my PA, so it was no =
big deal=20
to <BR>>include an Ensoniq DP4, but now that I am using powered =
cabs I want=20
to <BR>>trim down my rack and I'm looking for a good sounding half =
rack=20
type <BR>>verb. Do any of the Alesis units sound good? I used to =
have those=20
old <BR>>Lexicon half racks and they were OK, but not good=20
IMHO.<BR>><BR>>Any recommendations?<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C8CBCB.D7278470--I have the same dilemma, now I waiting for this one "the t.racks TFX-1016"
from www.Thomman.de
I buy this cheap unit in blind, don;t know quality.
Cost me 59 EUR with shipping
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:<
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 06 14:48:52 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02878 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
