|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55722 is a reply to message #55711] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 11:03   |
![Deej [3] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [3] is currently offline")
Deej [3]
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>Mike,
> >>
> >>Deej says you're clocking a Rumour along with your Paris rig. I have
some
> >>specific questions about that, if you don't mind emailing me. Or, we can
> >>handle it here.
> >>
> >>Thanks!
> >>Jimmy
> >>
> >>
> >
>In that case, you might want to drop it into Sonar or Acid and lock the
measures.
AA
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:42f043e2$1@linux...
>
> "gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>Yup, and here's how I handle it.
>>>
>>>Pull the wav, split it out to two PAF files.
>>>Drop those in Paris. Get a basic tempo, which you have already done.
>>>Cut them both in the editor so that the first click starts right at the
>>top.
>>>Enable Grid.
>>>set the tempo to be 8/4, or even 16/4.. you'll get better resolution
>>>doing
>>
>>>it this way.
>>>Now, adjust the tempo in the project window until the last click is dead
>>on
>>>the beat
>>>
>>>Done.
>>>
>>>Surely you're editor of choice can do something similar??
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55723 is a reply to message #55722] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 12:02 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>
>>>AA
>>>
>>>
>>That's fine if the temp is "in between", but not if the tempo actually
>>drifts.
>>Gene
>>
>>Automatically, Automatically, Automatically, Automatically!
>
> I think Geno's right... it's somewhere "in between", and get
> this... the problem is compounded by the fact that his click is
> a hi-hat sample run through a digital delay & set to a loop.
> CubaseSX will go down to 10th's of a beat on tempo settings,
> but I could spend days trying to lock it & still have some
> drift, considering all that. I'm gonna program the drums in the
> Fantom at 81 BPM, re-play the rhythm guitar part for him on
> another track for reference, so he knows where I'm at in the
> song for each drum pattern or fill, etc.; and then he can re-
> track the rhythm part on his end once he dumps in the drums to
> play along with. At this stage that's all he's recorded (the
> rhythm part along with his click) so it's not like they'll have
> to toss bass track, vox, etc.
>
> Still... ARRRGH! If they were working in ANY kind of DAW it
> would be easier - could import scratch tracks, MIDI, etc.
>
> Neil..... and I from BT. Now, if it's drifting inside of itself, that is
different, but I've posted a fix to that as well :)
AA
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:42f03f93$1@linux...
>
> what he said.....you beat me Aaron. I probably learned it from you anyway.
> Rod
> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>Yup, and here's how I handle it.
>>
>>Pull the wav, split it out to two PAF files.
>>Drop those in Paris. Get a basic tempo, which you have already done.
>>Cut them both in the editor
|
|
|
|
| Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55963 is a reply to message #55722] |
Sat, 16 July 2005 19:38 |
Craig Mitchell
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
f="http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050822/D8C4U4480.html" target="_blank">http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050822/D8C4U4480.html....so i guess the question is whether the ada8000 sounds any good r whether
its practical to record simultaniously on 2 eds1000 cards, just to get enough
inputs...(Mec + 2i/o on one eds, and 442+2i/o on the other...)....sorry i'm
getting off the subject a bit!? not following your logic here... the MEC with two input cards gives
a full 16 inputs to the first submix, the 442 will only give you a
total of 6 inputs for the second submix using SPDIF as well. This
gives you a total of 22 possible inputs.
David.
Justin wrote:
> ...so i guess the question is whether the ada8000 sounds any good r whether
> its practical to record simultaniously on 2 eds1000 cards, just to get enough
> inputs...(Mec + 2i/o on one eds, and 442+2i/o on the other...)....sorry i'm
> getting off the subject a bit!
>
>Sigh. The sad ending to every good life. Awesome dude by any measure.
Jimmy
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:430a062d$1@linux...
>
> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050822/D8C4U4480.htmlI have full FX pack, don't see "Chuck's wiring plug".?????
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Actually, it IS possible. You have to use Chuck's wiring plug in the FX
>pack, I think that has been released to the public?
>Stock, Paris will not do this w/o some creative use/thinking, a few I/O's
>and an external compressor.
>AA
>
>
>"RZ" <pearlmusic@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:4307dc42@linux...
>> That would require an output and input that I've never seen. If they
>> existed the routing would
|
|
|
|
| Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55969 is a reply to message #55963] |
Sat, 16 July 2005 22:04 |
justcron
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
fine in other
machines.
On 23 Aug 2005 08:37:17 +1000, "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>I've got a K8NS-Ultra-939 I'm working on at the moment.
>
>So far I haven't got it stable. Keeps on BSODing with a "A Problem has been
>detected and Windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your system"
>error. That's without the Paris cards in it though, so it's not Paris doing
>it. It's possibly a ram fault or something, but the ram passes the 4 hours
>of testing I gave it.
>
>I'm still working on it, but I'll keep the NG up to date when I work it out.
>
>Aside from the issues, she is pretty quick. ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Jon Jiles" <nono@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>Any one using this MOBO in DAW land with good results?
>>
>>If so, with Paris ... or something else?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>jjIt's not in the add on FX pack, but it does comes with the FX Subsystem for
Windows XP. It's called Out Wire. I don't think it's available on ME / 98SE
(though it may be possible just to extract these plugs from the subsystem
and use them on 98, I couldn't vouch for that though...)
Hope this helps.
Dan
"zmora" <docent191@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>
>I have full FX pack, don't see "Chuck's wiring plug".?????
>
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>Actually, it IS possible. You have to use Chuck's wiring plug in the FX
>
>>pack, I think that has been released to the public?
>>Stock, Paris will not do this w/o some creative use/thinking, a few I/O's
>
>>and an external compressor.
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"RZ" <pearlmusic@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:4307dc42@linux...
>>> That would require an output and input that I've never seen. If they
>>> existed the routing would have to appear in the patchbay window with
a
>>> separate module labeled effects sidechain I/O.
>>>
>>> I would probably use the channel inserts to run through an analog
>>> compressor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
