Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release
| Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release [message #76215] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 12:28  |
Bill Terry
 Messages: 10 Registered: January 2008
|
Junior Member |
|
|
this stuff, I'd say do your
> homework here first, asking the guys who have it already,
> and don't trust what tyhe Creamware reps tell you, because in
> my own personal experience, they don't know their product very
> well, and they certaily they don't stand behind it (I mean, when
> a guy whines to me that he's going to lose money if he takes
> the product back, even after he told me it WOULD do something
> that it DOESN'T, then THAT is a guy that ought not to be running
> any kind of business in the first place).
>
> Anyway, the stuff doens't suck, and I'm sure some of you could
> find it useful; just pick your cards and i/o options carefully
> is what I'm trying to say, because it's very unlikely that if
> you need to swap something out, the
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release [message #76217 is a reply to message #76215] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 12:00   |
Tony Benson
 Messages: 453 Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t> wrote:
>>>Too early to tell if it's going to
>>improve my situation in the limited capacity I'm able to use
>>it for what I'm trying to accomplish, but do far I can tell you
>>that the sound certainly sucketh not.<
>>
>>Muhahaha!!!1...........this means that a "Pro" card with an ADAT interface
>
>>(12 stereo stems @ 88.1!!!!) is just around the corner, right Neil?
>
> Actually, I'd be better off just getting one of their ADAT
> chainer card thingies for more lightpipe inputs, but no -
> although I'd like to get more inputs, I still wouldn't be able
> to get more OUTputs unless I added another Multiface or some
> other kind of interface onto the Cubase PC (remember, at 88.2k,
> I can get a max of four channels of lightpipe out of each of my
> two Multifaces... errr.... Multifascia?)
>
> HOWEVER......... having said all that, I actually think I might
> be getting what I needed out of this setup - I hate to say it &
> jinx it, but check this out:
>
> Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release [message #76218 is a reply to message #76215] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 13:20   |
DC
Messages: 722 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
temmedIntoPulsar.mp3" target="_blank"> http://www.saqqararecords.com/MiscAudio/DracoClip-ITBvsStemm edIntoPulsar.mp3
>
> This clip contains two versions of the same section of the same
> song... he first version that goes up to about :50 seconds into
> the file is the best ITB mix I can get on this song. The second
> cut, that goes from about :50 on, is the same mix, stemmed out
> of Cubase via lightpipe into four separate submixes & summed in
> Pulsar.
>
> Here's what I'm hearing on these two cuts... now, if you're
> listening on PC speakers you may not hear what I'm talking
> about here, but remember I said that I was like 98%-99%
> there, and I was looking for that 1 or two percent difference -
> I think this might be it...
> Anyway, comparing the first cut to the second cut, what I hear
> about the 2nd cut that I like better is that it has a little
> more "substance" in the lows/low mids now, and the high's, while
> still quite present, are perhaps a little bit s
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release [message #76219 is a reply to message #76215] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 13:23   |
Nil
Messages: 245 Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
moother than
> those on the first clip. Vox seem a bit smoother, too;
> or maybe just sit a little better in the mix. IME, the second
> clip has a little more impact, and there's also something about
> it that just "feels better" to listen to.
>
> To me this is similar on the lower end to what I was getting
> when I tried summing through Paris, but it also doesn't lose
> the top-end clarity - I presume partly due to the fact that I'm
> able to keep everything in the digital domain via lightpipe,
> rather than having to go out into Analog to sum in Paris via the
> 8-in Module.
>
> What do you think?
>
> NeilHey Thad. Tempest in a teapot, it seems. Looks like it's just a Windows
kinda' thing as far as what the driver properties display. The Pulsar should
be working at 24bit, if 24 bit is the bitrate of the record/playback audio
software.
Deej
"TCB" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Paris user Tommy Detamore scores a national release [message #76254 is a reply to message #76215] |
Tue, 21 November 2006 08:37   |
Jamie K
 Messages: 1115 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rom the underside will give you ton's of top end with pretty well
any snare, just be aware of phase issues with top and bottom mics
Don
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45968298$1@linux...
>
> I listen to contemporary CD's - jazz, rock, R&B, C&W, you name it - and
> hear
> beautiful, bright snare drums that make my RTA bounce around in the 16K -
> 20K range. I can't make that happen without a ton of EQ. I usually use
> a Crown CM-200 (electret condenser, kinda like an SM-57, but flatter and
> cleaner to my ear) on snare, but I've tried a Neumann KM-84 and I still
> need to crank the EQ to get that sound. Is that just what it takes? Are
> there snare drums that naturally generate higher harmonics than most? Is
> it something to do w
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 08 13:03:02 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.68069 seconds
|