| OT:Its a go! [message #87466] |
Tue, 03 July 2007 12:31  |
Nappy
Messages: 198 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>>>>want
>>>
>>>>it clean, clear, deep a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:Its a go! [message #87471 is a reply to message #87469] |
Tue, 03 July 2007 14:15   |
Tom Bruhl
 Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
that post hole digger?)
;o)Thanks DJ. I'll check around for the amp.
Wayne
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:469cefe7$1@linux...
>
> "Wayne Carson" <carson_wayne@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:469ba2b3@linux...
>> Wow! Such a variety. Great inputs.
>>
>> NS10s - John, can you recommend an amp? Quiet, clean, reference and cool
>> (minimal heat) pushing 200w per side. I'm using an Alesis RA-100 now
>> with just 75watts per side. It's quiet and cool.
>>
>
> The Alesis Matica 900 has 270W/CH at 8 ohms and runs quiet and cool.
> Though discontinued, they can be found pretty easily and at good prices.
> If you add a sub, be sure to use a powered sub.
>uggg.The more I use it the more I like it. I haven't gotten really deep into it,
it has a cool feature where you can select different emulations of the EQ
section for up to seven bands. So you can have the low end shelf from a Focusrite
and the mid range band from a Pultec and the high from a Neve console.
I've been planning on running some drums and vox through the emulations that
are on both the UAD and the LM. I'll post a link that here when I get around
to it.
TCB
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>What is the skinny on Liquid Mix? Is it equal, better or worse than UAD1
>in quality?
>
>James McCloskey wrote:
>> http://sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid=5023I was just about to suggest that idea -- rotate the whole mess 45
degrees... Best thing you can do for zero dollars when stuck working
in a standard box type room-in-a-house... You can park some stuff in
the corner behind your desk (computer, etc.), make a few other
creative adjustments -- but i bet things will sound a little less
boomy right from the jump...
Do it, man!
--chas.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:15:38 -0700, "Wayne Carson"
<carson_wayne@msn.com> wrote:
>Neil/Dave,
>
>Yes, that is a window to the left. Can't go farther to the left . . .
>family reasons. Did you mean, flip-flop the keyboard and rack? Nuthin'
>would change with the speaker placement.
>
>What do you think if I moved the rack and turned the desk at a 45 degree to
>the corner so that each monitor is equally spaced about 3' from the corner?
>I know, I'm still in a corner, but at least it would be a better balance.
>One monitor would be about half way along the left wall and the right
>monitor would be approx where the rack currently is. Then stuff a bunch of
>blankets behind the desk to fill up the void. I am pretty much stuck in
>this corner and it does work quite well with the exception of the corner
>speaker, so any more opinions on desk arrangements are welcome.
>
>Thanks,
>Wayne
>
>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:469bdaeb$1@linux...
>>
>> Dave's right - you really ought to see if you can rearrange your
>> setup so that you can have at least some semblance of a
>> bilaterally symmetrical front end there. What'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|