|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Loudness War [message #88594 is a reply to message #88593] |
Fri, 27 July 2007 22:58   |
Tom Bruhl
 Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
amp;lt;FONT =
face=3D3DArial=20
size=3D3D2></FONT> </DIV><BR>> =
<DIV><FONT =
size=3D3D2><BR><BR>I choose=20
Polesoft Lockspam to fight=20
spam,<BR>=3D<BR>>and=3D20<BR>> =20
you?<BR><A=3D20<BR>> =
=3D<BR>>href=3D3D"<A=20
=
href=3D'http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
'>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer</A=
>=3D<BR>>.html</A>=20
=
</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTML> <BR=
>><BR>><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE ></BLOCKQUOTE></BL=
OCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTM=
L>
------=_NextPart_000_001A_01C801C4.5290AC90--wavelab
Don Nafe wrote:
> Hi All
>
> what is everyone using nowadays
>
> Don
>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK Pro Audio
(859) 635-5762
www.adkproaudio.com
chrisl@adkproaudio.comHI David,
Is that file size limit also when using Broadcast Wave? BWF size is 4
gigs. Does PT have a auto split function at all?
That would be a pretty big limitation of the Venue system I would think.
Glad none of th native apps have this limitation. :)
Chris
EK Sound wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> I found out that it is PT that has a single file limit of 2GB. That is
> 2:03:00 at mono 24/96. I was doing a test for a live show coming up
> that I have to track. I just have to make sure I don't use any stereo
> tracks and I should be fine.
>
> Oh, and here is a lame tidbit of info... this is right from Digi's site...
>
> "IDE/ATA & SATA Hard Drives
>
> SATA Hard Drives
>
> Internal SATA drives are qualified for up to 32 tracks, 24 bit, 44.1/48
> kHz with Pro Tools|HD systems on Power Mac G5 models.
>
> Dedicated recording drives only, recording to the startup drive is not
> supported."
>
> Seems kinda low, doesn't it... talk about covering your ass!
>
> Thanks,
>
> David.
>
> rick wrote:
>> yes it does but you can slow the tempo prior to recording and will
>> gain more time.
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:07:12 -0600, EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Does the Mac Pro and OSX have a file size limit? I just tried
>>> recording 48 tracks at 24/96 on HD but it cut out after 2 hours and
>>> change with a 1.99GB track file size...
>>>
>>> Just curious...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David.
>>
>>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK Pro Audio
(859) 635-5762
www.adkproaudio.com
chrisl@adkproaudio.comdid you get the driver?"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:46fd1985$1@linux...
> Internal SATA drives are qualified for up to 32 tracks, 24 bit, 44.1/48
> kHz with Pro Tools|HD systems on Power Mac G5 models.
>
> Dedicated recording drives only, recording to the startup drive is not
> supported."
>
> Seems kinda low, doesn't it... talk about covering your ass!
32 tracks at 24/44-48 is low for SATA. 100+ is no problem with native rigs.
I guess if Digi sets expectations low, it's easier to exceed them and look
really good. :-)
Dedric
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Loudness War [message #88622 is a reply to message #88596] |
Sun, 29 July 2007 19:35  |
Tom Bruhl
 Messages: 1368 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ce shaker.
John wrote:
> I'm looking to make some simple pro sounding instruments for percussion type
> sounds. Anyone have ideas or sites that have tips?
>
> I'm probably going to start with some glass pop bottles and something very
> hard to get a bright ping out of. Also, some 16 oz pop bottles with rice
> in them maybe for shakers. Any ideas? I'm looking for great sounds.
>
> ThanksNeil, I really don't do that much inserting on the fly . My method is to just
keep oopening up different instances in different slots. Then, toggle the
bypass sitch to test.
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Last night I loaded up those Antress Modern plugin's that (I
>think it was) Lamont came across & posted here.
>
>Anyone else getting operational issues with these things?
>In my case, if I'm inserting & de-inserting them on the fly,
>I've had several lockups where the CPU meter doesn't get close
>to 100%, but Cubase locks up & I have to shut it down & restart
>(just the app, not the whole computer).
>
>Standing still there's no problem, but if I'm in playback &
>trying them out is is when it happens - usually on the removal
>of the plugin from the channel (stereo/mono, track/group
>channel, 2-buss - doesn't matter).
>
>Some of 'em sound pretty good, tho, I must say!
>
>Neilrick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>looks like 12/12 by itself plus 48 additional I/O with thier impact
>pres (4).
<begin paste from TC website>
With 8 TRS line inputs on the rear panel, the total amount of simultaneously
streamable analog inputs is 12.
</end paste>
3rd paragraph on this page:
http://www.tcelectronic.com/Default.asp?Id=12371
Neilrick wrote:
>
> feed 50 guys beans and you've got a pipe organ...sort of...
>
If you want the "pipe organ" effect, you must also serve varying sizes
of macaroni at the same meal!!!
;-)
JeffDidn't Will used to use Paris? I seem to recall seeing his name attached to
some postings.
Despite the fact that words are often clumsy containers, his latest album
seems the result of a hero's journey. Congratulations Will.
MR
"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:46fd38de$1@linux...
>
> As some of you may be aware, my colleague and very good friend Will
Downing
> was stricken with a severe illness called Polymyositis at the end of last
> year. He is working towards recovery, but despite the illness, he
completed
> his CD "After Tonight". I am truly in awe of his fortitude!
>
> The single was release this week and was #1 most added across the country.
> I had the great opportunity to work with Will in his completion of this
effort.
>
>
http://www.peak-records.com/index.php?page=artist-profile&am p;name=Will-Downing
>
> TyroneIf Microsoft came to my daddy, he'd kick 'em in the butt and send 'em back
to the playground to settle the score.
MR
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:46fd13e9$1@linux...
>
> From a cranky long/short value hedge fund guy. Love this stuff.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Friday, September 28, 2007
> Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.to Lobby for the World's Largest Unregulated
> Monopoly
>
>
>
> It happens only occasionally: something so beyond the pale of logic and
reason
> that further commentary is barely necessary.
>
> But it does happen, and it happened yesterday: Microsoft, of all
companies,
> sent its General Counsel to the United States Senate to beg the government
> to stop Google, the world's most successful internet search company, from
> buying a small, unrelated banner ad company.
>
> In other words, Microsoft-the world's largest and most successful
unregulated
> monopoly-is asking our government to stop Google from continuing to beat
> Microsoft in the free marketplace
>
> I am not making this up.
>
> Here are Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith's own words:
>
> "Now, already Google is the dominant company for one of the two main types
> of online advertising, search online ads. Roughly 70 percent of global
spending
> on searchbased advertising today flows through Google's AdWords service."
>
>
> Roughly 95% of global spending on desktop computer operating software
flows
> through Microsoft bank account. What's he complaining about?
>
> Nevertheless, there's more:
>
>
> "If Google is allowed to proceed with this merger, it will also obtain a
> dominant gateway position over the other main type of online advertising,
> nonsearch ads the nonsearch ads that are displayed on Web sites that we
visit.
> Today, Google and DoubleClick are the two largest competitors in this
area.
> And as I hope we will discuss more, they are competitors in this area. And
> yet combined, Google will account for nearly 80 percent of all spending on
> nonsearch ads served to third party Web sites."
>
> Both Google and DoubleClick became dominant in a free marketplace, with
competitive
> products against bigger, better-funded companies, including Mr. Smith's
employer,
> the World's Largest Non-Utility Monopoly.
>
> Again, what is he complaining about?
>
> Quite a bit, as it turns out:
>
> "In short, if Google and
|
|
|
|