The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » moving toward paint by number songwriting and production?
moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:27 Go to next message
Chris Latham is currently offline  Chris Latham   UNITED STATES
Messages: 109
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
ndition of the mic. I think
=
>I have a reasonalbe expectation to have a functional mic and I think the
=
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86143 is a reply to message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
s not going to do jack ****. Judging
=
>by the=20
>language in his ad, he is obvious intent is to sell a used mic and then
=
>deny=20
>responsibility for it's condition because <EM>"this item will be sold as
=
>is and=20
>will not arrive D.O.A"</EM> because "<EM> I plugged it in =
>with=20
>Phantom power it works and sounds great"</EM></FONT></P>
><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Since I paid for bo
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86149 is a reply to message #86143] Tue, 05 June 2007 20:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
r both mics at once, Paypal gave this a single =
>>transaction # and has frozen the payment for both mics. I clearly told =
>>him (when he replied to my complaint) and to PayPal (when I made the =
>>complaint) that my problem was with only one of the mics. I will be fine
> =
>>with releasing the funds to him for the working mic, but I have not yet
> =
>>received a reply from him to my reply *to* his reply to my reply (sigh).
>>
>>I have asked him to pay for the repair or give me a full refund for the
> =
>>mic if the capsule is not repairable. II am also willing to abide by the
> =
>>opinion of the folks at Neumann as to the condition of the mic. I think
> =
>>I have a reasonalbe expectation to have a functional mic and I think the
> =
>>sellers attempts to have it both ways by stating that the mic works, but<
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86154 is a reply to message #86136] Tue, 05 June 2007 21:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
oxed
> =
>>up both=20
>>mics, called Neumann, talked to their tech support, got an RA# and =
>>shipped the=20
>>mics on Monday PM.</FONT></P>
>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I then called PayPal and described the =
>>problem. They=20
>>stated that their policy is that no matter how a seller represents an =
>>item, if=20
>>he accepts Payment by PayPal, he is subject to the PP 45 day=20
>>complaint/arbitration/refund policy (I guess this may be why people who
> =
>>sell=20
>>very expensive old "vintage" mics, don't accept PayPal. The support guy
> =
>>also=20
>>advised me to go ahead and submit a complaint so that this could be =
>>handled=20
>>properly.</FONT></P>
>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I thought about this and then e-mailed =
>>the seller=20
>>through EBay with a brief description of what had happened. I didn't =
>>h
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86181 is a reply to message #86136] Wed, 06 June 2007 01:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sarah is currently offline  Sarah   UNITED STATES
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
Senior Member
e content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Did you lose the 442 yet?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&
Re: moving toward paint by number songwriting and production? [message #86194 is a reply to message #86181] Wed, 06 June 2007 07:15 Go to previous message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
t; problem.
>>>>
>>>> Neil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>>>I especially like the part where he applies phnntom power and calls it
>>
>>>>>good.
>>>>
>>>>>This was a sequentially numbered pair out of a lot of 5. I haven't seen
>>>>
>>>>>feedback from the other buyers yet. I will say that this pair of mics
>>>>>reproduces a signal (or at least *reproduced*) a much truer replication
>>>> of
>>>>>the original signal than any instrument mic I've ever heard, though I
>>>>>admittedly haven't heard them all.
>>>>>
>>>>>;o)
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bill L&quo
Previous Topic: Don't bother with Firefox 2.0.0.4
Next Topic: Pics from outdoor show
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 06 03:44:24 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.57848 seconds