Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » My next mix setup?
| My next mix setup? [message #74451] |
Thu, 19 October 2006 12:24  |
gene Lennon[3]
Messages: 40 Registered: June 2006
|
Member |
|
|
ilto:alex.plasko@snet.net" target="_blank">alex.plasko@snet.net> wrote in message news:455751ee@linux...
> Instruments always seem to hold their value if not increase.I should have
> just collected guitars.
> DC" <dc@spammersinTX.org> wrote in message news:45574e5f$1@linux...
> >
> > Oh hey, it's a bargain. His archtops start at 10K...
> >
> > Every year he brings a stunning archtop to NAMM for some
> > enormous price. Every year it sells.
> >
> > DC
> >
> >
> > "Neil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: My next mix setup? [message #74459 is a reply to message #74451] |
Thu, 19 October 2006 15:24   |
excelav
 Messages: 2130 Registered: July 2005 Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>Neil wrote:
>>> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hey Neil,
>>>>
>>>>Feel free to give me a call if you hit any snags with the Pulsar.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the offer, Deej - I may do that... it's not
>>> scheduled to get here until late next week, actually, so it
>>> won't be right away that I need to take you up on it if I have
>>> problems.
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've been test driving mine some more today and I'm still
>>>>liking it a lot.
>>>
>>>
>>> What? You havent shitcanned it yet? (oh, no wait, that's
>>> tomorrow - Sunday) :D j/k!
>>>
>>> BTW I decided to get the Professional card (instead of the
>>> Project card) for more DSP, and I passed on the convertors
>>> (their A16ultra box), since I didn't want to dump too much
>>> money into this experiment if it didn't work out. In talking to
>>> Gary, he wasn't sure if I'd be able to sum as many channels as
>>> I'm running, plus a couple of 'verbs, plus a few channels of
>&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: My next mix setup? [message #74470 is a reply to message #74463] |
Thu, 19 October 2006 18:56   |
Nil
Messages: 245 Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
have
>>> problems.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>>I've been test driving mine some more today and I'm still
>>>>liking it a lot.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> What? You havent shitcanned it yet? (oh, no wait, that's
>>> tomorrow - Sunday) :D j/k!
>>>=20
>>> BTW I decided to get the Professional card (instead of the
>>> Project card) for more DSP, and I passed on the convertors
>>> (their A16ultra box), since I didn't want to dump too much
>>> money into this experiment if it didn't work out. In talking to
>>> Gary, he wasn't sure if I'd be able to sum as many channels as
>>> I'm running, plus a couple of 'verbs, plus a few channels of
>>> dynamics at 88.2k/24-bit with the Project card. Then I got a
>>> lecture about using 88.2k in the first place... you know - the
>>> whole "you can't hear it once you convert to 44.1 for CD's
>>> anyway, and then you also get aliasing when you do, and in the
>>> meanwhile you're using too many DSP & CPU resources" - blah,
>>> blah, blah, yada, yada, yada... tell it to Rupert Neve & Geoff
>>> E
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: My next mix setup? [message #74488 is a reply to message #74451] |
Fri, 20 October 2006 01:42   |
rick
 Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e I haven't needed to use that before.
> >>>=20
> >>> If anyone can give me a hint as to what I might try, I'd
> >>> appreciate it!
> >>>=20
> >>> In any event, I'm using 4 sets of stereo analog outs, going
> >>> into the Paris 8-in module, and monitoring off the MEC... what
> >>> do I think so far? Well, there's definitely a difference vs.
> >>> mixing ITB on a 2-buss Native mix, as I suspected there would
> >>> be. Does it sound better than a straight 2-buss Native mix?
> >>> Yeah, I think so in a way... I'm definitely losing some high
> >>> end, but it sounds bigger - won't be able to tell for sure
> >>> until I a/b them, but those are my initital impressions. To me
> >>> it sounds much like what you'd get if you stemmed out four or
> >>> five stereo submixes in SX, then re-imported them into a new
> >>> project & summed it to your final 2-track mix from there.
> >>> Again, not certain how close the
|
|
|
|
| Re: My next mix setup? [message #74505 is a reply to message #74453] |
Fri, 20 October 2006 10:08   |
duncan
 Messages: 123 Registered: November 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ient way of grouping them without
really "grouping" them audio-wise. Also in this manner, all the
group send/return effects that have anything to do with each
track are included in the particular stem, as well. Now in this
case I don't dither down at this stage, what I do is to export
each stem at 88.2k/32-bit float, then open a new (empty)
project, and import those stem files I just created... if I'm
getting any overs on the master, I just bring down each stereo
stem channel by the same amount, and it keeps everything in
the same balance - easy. At THAT point, I dither down to
16-bit/44.1k for the final stereo mix file.
-For the "Mixed in Native/Summed in Paris" mix, I of course kept
the mix identical, but sent four groups out of one of my
Multiface's 8 balanced analog outs to the 8-in MEC module.
Those groups were similar, but not identical to the stems I
used for the stems mix version (I didn't want to send a fifth
group out, because then I would've had to use the lower-
resolution MEC Master inputs); those groups were:
1.) Drums
2.) Low End stuff & Rhythm Guitars
3.) Keys & solo guitars
4.) Vocals
Now, I did place a transparent brickwall limiter set at -0.3
and no gain maximization across each output, so that I wouldn't
clip either the 8-in module or the individual channels in
Paris. This also replicated the stems mix in that regard,
because I limit everything going out into stems to -0.3.
I know some of you guys love the clip factor in Paris, but I
wanted to make it fair in all respects.... if I'm avoiding
clipping in SX, I should also be avoiding it in Paree. In this
regard, neither the 8-in module's inputs or any of the
individual channels in Paris were clipping with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 06 20:47:58 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11529 seconds
|