The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Two thumbs up!
Two thumbs up! [message #69976] Wed, 05 July 2006 18:59 Go to next message
gene lennon is currently offline  gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
thical behavior should be based effectually on
> > sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is
> > necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained
by
> > fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." - Albert Einstein
> >
>
Re: Two thumbs up! [message #69977 is a reply to message #69976] Tue, 04 July 2006 19:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
uptown jimmy is currently offline  uptown jimmy   UNITED STATES
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
> And finally, I didn't mention "ghouls and head choppers" because the
evil of
> > "ghouls and head choppers" is not in dispute. I'm concerned about what
has
> > been done and is being done in my name as an American, because I believe
> > that to also be evil and I'm just a little more than worried about the
> > potential consequences of this.
> >
> > But I have to be honest . . . I feel like I just wasted another hour
that I
> > could have been catching up on sleep in. I should have learned by now
that
> > the more you challenge fixed beliefs, the harder the believer clings to
> > them. You are of course free to believe w
Re: Two thumbs up! [message #69985 is a reply to message #69977] Thu, 06 July 2006 04:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
til I checked it)
>
>
>Then my guitar builder friend told me about this guy.
>
>http://www.mimf.com/nutcomp/
>
>Check out the pics if you don't want to read the whole thing.
>
>BTW, none of the fixed staggered nuts like the Earvana are likely
>to truly work well unless you use the exact same guitar, and strings
>that they used. Fixed, staggered nuts suffer from the same design
>flaw as fixed bridges at the other end of the guitar - one size fits all.
>
>Well it doesn't. Not if you want it right.
>
>Anyway, I first did a version of Delft's nut a year ago on one of the
>guitars using pick material of different thicknesses as shim stock
>and attaching them with super glue. Worked great. The guitar
>played more in tune than any guitar I have played. (I do use the
>Petersen sweetened tuning BTW, but do NOT use it or any other
>when setting up the nut staggers. Standard equal temperment only
>and you need a good chromatic tuner)
>
>Because that guitar plays better than all the others, (and it has worn
Re: Two thumbs up! [message #69999 is a reply to message #69985] Thu, 06 July 2006 09:58 Go to previous message
gene Lennon[3] is currently offline  gene Lennon[3]
Messages: 40
Registered: June 2006
Member
>>> While
>>>>>>> this was a good move for Apple to get a faster and better hardware
>>
>>>>>>> system,
>>>>>>> it did narrow the distinction between the Mac and PC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It will be interesting to see which turns in better performance numbers
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> Nuendo tests with the same hardware in place - e.g. which OS is most
>>>> bloated
>>>>>>> (given that it would ASIO vs. Core Audio, which is apples and oranges).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The main reason I've stayed with PCs (despite having been down the
>>Mac
>>>> path
>>>>>>> a couple of times) is price for the performance, ease of repair and
>>
>>>>>>> lower
>>>>>>> repair costs, much larger pool of available software, and now,
>>>>>>> FXTeleport.
>>>>>>> I don't particularly like Windows.
Re: Two thumbs up! [message #70016 is a reply to message #69999] Wed, 05 July 2006 17:14 Go to previous message
uptown jimmy is currently offline  uptown jimmy   UNITED STATES
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
d another hour
>>> that I
>>>>> could have been catching up on sleep in. I should have learned by now
>>> that
>>>>> the more you challenge fixed beliefs, the harder the believer clings
> to
>>>>> them. You are of course free to believe what you want, but again,
>>> beliefs
>>>>> are by definition unproven, and therefore someone else's beliefs are
> not
>>>>> wrong simply because they contradict yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, I mean it this time . . . I give up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sarah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinmaui.com> wrote in message news:44e23a46$1@linux...
>>>>>> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The problem with blind faith is that one risks being blinded by
> faith.
>>>>>>> (Speaking from personal experience).
>>>>>> Faith in God is not blind. What is blind is the choice to call God
>>>>>> unknowable. That is a choice to remain blind, and its source is
>>>>>> solely and admittedly, human. Your assumption is that all views are
>>>>>> human at the source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I disagree emphatically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything prodeeds from one's assumptions. Even considering
>>>>>> that the creator c
Previous Topic: Recording Drums
Next Topic: OT; Who was the first president of th US?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 07 00:55:37 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.29559 seconds