| Ensoniq [message #55930] |
Sat, 16 July 2005 08:10  |
ulfiyya
Messages: 25
Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
_blank">1@linux...
Hi,=20
Just wondering if anyone has any idea how I can get my FX presets to =
save
in XP (Paris v3). Whenever I reboot I loose them all?
Should I try r
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Ensoniq [message #56058 is a reply to message #56056] |
Mon, 18 July 2005 20:22  |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:431b202a@linux...
> > This is one major reason that the Democrats lost the presidential
> > election.
> > People like you and Howard Dean show up to the party dressed in your
> > insane
> > clown suits and immediately anything you have to say is discounted due
to
> > your demeanor and previous track record .........and that's a shame
> > because
> > everyone should have a say. When you sound like a broken record spouting
> > the
> > same old party line, your say isn't taken as seriously as it might be if
> > it
> > was based on actually trying to see both sides of an issue.
>
> I'm not a democrat asshole... I just hate Bush. I've almost always voted
> Republican, and I voted Green in the last election.
>
> If you dont like what I have to say regarding my opinion, thats fine.
When
> you pull Howard Dean out of your ass, really you're just exposing your OWN
> BIAS, the very thing you seem to be critisizing any non-bush-apologists
for.
>
> Bush is the fuckin clown, it pisses me off, and I'm not afraid to say it.
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:431b2393@linux...
> When
>> you pull Howard Dean out of your ass, really you're just exposing your
>> OWN
>> BIAS, the very thing you seem to be critisizing any non-bush-apologists
>
> When you sound like Howard Dean, you invite the comaprison.........and you
> sound *exactly like Howard DEan. I don't give shit what label you give
> yourself, it's your actions that speak for themselves and you're living in
> his camp dude. If you want to hate Bush, fine. Why not try to look at both
> sides rather than letting left wing interest groups do your tinking for
> you?
You're absolutely crazy Deej.
My thoughts have been formed the last week primarily viewing mainstream
network news.
You're stuck in partisan mode, and somehow you think it's rubbing off on me.When I was living in New Orleans in the 80's there was a lot of discussion
about how the depletion of the water table was actually causing the city to
sink even farther below sea level.
The original city (the French Quarter and the area long St. Charles and
Carrolton known locally as *uptown*) survived this and always has survived
hurricanes. This is because the original founders of the city recognized
that they needed to build on the high ground. The surrounding suburbs are
drained wetlands. This whole area used to be a large dry knoll surrounded by
something similar to the everglades.
"DTerry" <dterry@no_spamkeyofd.net> wrote in message
news:BF40778B.40E0%dterry@no_spamkeyofd.net...
> I think the discussion here, and the actual situation in New Orleans at
hand
> is that the levees broke, and wetlands had nothing to do with it - the
Lake
> just exceeded capacity - a hazard New Orleans has always faced - building
a
> city below sea level is a nightmare waiting to happen, unless you build
> 100ft high, 100ft deep concrete barriers all the way around.
>
> Wetlands are not a sufficient barrier between a city and water, and the
fact
> that part of New Orleans was built on filled in marshlands doesn't help -
> saturated ground, surrounded by water, below water line is prime territory
> for flooding - it's only a matter of time. There were many articles and
> speculation that New Orleans could not survive a major hurricane - the
city
> was living on borrowed time unfortunately. All the political blame in the
> world won't change the fact that this disaster happened because of New
> Orleans location. Blaming the government for this disaster is no more
> grounded than blaming a the secretary of defense for allowing a tornado to
> wipe out a farm in Kansas. Research also takes a bit of objectivity, both
> scientific and political.
>
> I'm with you guys on environmental conservation - the more the better
> (wetlands included), but developers hate the idea, and an
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
