|
|
|
|
| Re: IRQ update [message #76915 is a reply to message #76532] |
Sun, 10 December 2006 15:58   |
uptown jimmy
Messages: 441
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
had 8 data
>> pipelines going in and out of the chip. The P4 had 2. The G4 had way more
>> cache on board than the P4 did, in some cases more than 4 times as much.
>> The G4 would typically compete toe to toe with a P4 with twice the clock
>> speed.
>>
>> Apple, AMD. IBM and Motorola, started calling Intel out on "The MHz Myth".
>> Clock speed no longer was the only determining factor in computing speed,
>> system and processor architecture ruled the day, thus AMD's equal to a P4
>> XX GHz labeling on there processors. I still use my G4 1.25 MHz and I can
>> tell you from experience, it is faster than my p4 2.4 and 2.8 prescott dual
>> threaded with faster bussing.
>>
>> So you say that the G5 were slow. In there time, they weren't and they're
>> still not slow! But you constantly say they are, and call Steve Jobs a
> lier.
>> Back when the G5 came out it was #3 in the world! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLujLtgBJC0&mode=related& amp;search=
>> The G5 is not a slow computer. Apple uses independent testing laboratories.
>> It just more anti Mac bashing on your part.
>>
>> You say that because Apple moved to Intel it proves that you were right
> all
>> along, not even close! When Apple Dumped the Mac cloning, motorola was
> pissed.
>> I know first hand, they told me. They also told me they were going to
> get
>> Apple back because they had a 90 million dollar charge off. They stalled
>> Apple on G4 processor shipments and intentionally slowed the processor speed
|
|
|
|
| Re: IRQ update [message #76929 is a reply to message #76915] |
Mon, 11 December 2006 04:55 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
uch venom, as you say, is because of the both the past and even current
>>>lies and propaganda that spews from his mouth..
>>>
>>>Statements like : Re-invent and Faster Personal Computer ever in my opinion
>>>is just plain wrong. I know too many had working people who believed His
>>>(Jobs) hype. Only to be sorely disa pointed when they found out that the
>>>Cpu test were rigged, and their Mac did "crash" on both OS8,9 and even
>OS-X(all
>>>versions).
>>>
>>>He (Jobs) usually mocks at windows user and Microsoft when he starts his
>>>keynote.(read: Dumb) When 90 percent of this world are using Windows based
>>>computers.
>>>
>>>So, the venom is actually corrections to the lies Mr Jobs spews. When
Mac
>>>users come and reguritate Mr Jobs lies, most Windows users will not just
>>>let them get away with such.
>>>
>>>I don't see anything wrong with setting the record straight.
>>>P.S.
>>>The Mac Pro is currently thee fastest Personal Computer on the market..
>>:)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Ted Gerber" <tedgerber@rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I have never entered into any computer platform discussion pro or con
>>>>in this newsgroup. I have my own preferences having worked on both, but
>>>I'm
>>>>not pushing my views on anyone else, except over beers at the local pub
>>>with
>>>>friends who are ready, willing and able. (As an aside, they are 1. Always
>>>>vehemont, and 2. Without any actual real world experience on one of the
>>>>platforms in question).
>>>>
>>>>I have to say that I am amazed by the venom that spews whenever someone
>>>>points to something Mac. It seems irrational to me. As if Steve Jobs
personally
>>>>injured some on this group. Why do we worry so m
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
