|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77467 is a reply to message #77466] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 12:03   |
![John [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "John [1] is currently offline")
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e handy dandy CDex program to convert mp3's<BR>to waves.
>>>>>
>>>>>=
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyone=20
>>>>>>know of a program that will do this??? My version of Wavelab<BR>will
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>>>>>only do=20
>>>>>>mp3's and Cubase SX3 is the same. I just wasted a half hour<BR>on =
>>>>>>idiottunes=20
>>>>>>with no success. Any one know of something out there?????=20
>>>>>>Bueller.....anyone?????<BR>Rod</BLOCKQUOTE>
>>>>>><DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam,
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>>>>>and=20
>>>>>>you?<BR><A=20
>>>>>>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>>>>>>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>I'm pretty much with you on everything you've said, except that I have to
confess I haven't heard Apple Venus or Wasp Star. (blush). Also, I really
do like Drums and Wires, but most of the the time, I can safely say that
Black Sea and Skylarking are my two favorites. My problem with English
Settlement is that I really don't like "Leisure," "It's Nearly Africa," or
"Down In the Cockpit," and I'm not that fond of "Knuckle Down." The rest of
it is amazing, though. On the Mummer CD, I really, really like "Love On a
Farmboy's Wages," "Me and the Wind", and also "Wonderland." They should've
put those on English Settlement in place of the ones I didn't like, and
they'd have a perfect album. :)
I know, it's all a matter of opinion, but I think we agree every album has
at least a couple real works of art, and the players are amazing.
Rock on . . .
Sarah
"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:45b5633e@linux...
> Not a big fan
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77470 is a reply to message #77465] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 11:51 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ass players
>> in
>> the universe. Not nearly the fame and fortune they deserved.
>>
>> "Even I never know where I go when my eyes are closed" - Andy Partridge
> from
>> "Chalkhills and Children"
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>>
>>
>> "Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>> news:45b43650@linux...
>> > XTC is the best. They released their best album in years with "Apple
>> > Venus".
>> > Gorgeous.
>> >
>> > I think they've recently called it quits after all these years.
>> >
>> > Love love love them. Andy is my hero. Lyrics like nobody else.
>> >
>> > "Summers Cauldron" from "Skylarking". That says it best. Just listen to
>> > that
>> > for a good sampling.
>> >
>> >
>> > "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message
> news:45b4344a@linux...
>> >> OK, I confess . . . these guys are about my favorititest band ever,
>> >> and
> I
>> >> just laughed out loud at this great early, early video. Before Dave
>> > Gregory
>> >> even . . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnhVulJiswo
>> >>
>> >> Never even heard this song before today. Damn, Andy was cute when he
> was
>> >> young . . .
>> >>
>> >> Sorry . . .
>> >>
>> >> Sarah
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>When they were good, they were great.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Sarah wrote:
> I'm pretty much with you on everything you've said, except that I have to
> confess I haven't heard Apple Venus or Wasp Star. (blush). Also, I really
> do like Drums and Wires, but most of the the time, I can safely say that
> Black Sea and Skylarking are my two favorites. My problem with English
> Settlement is that I really don't like "Leisure," "It's Nearly Africa," or
> "Down In the Cockpit," and I'm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77482 is a reply to message #77467] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 15:19 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
and for the extra solo and mute
>capability.
>
>-- thanks for keeping on top of these developments -- much appreciated
>-- chas.
>
>On 23 Jan 2007 04:25:42 +1000, "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>>
>>Well there is no pick from the list thing.
>>If you read all the posts you will understand that the latency is due to
>>the amount you manually type on a ceratin vertex instance vst plugin.
>>so if you put a 64 samples latent vst plugin you just type 64 and all other
>>audio tracks get delayed that amount !
>>The author just asks how much would be the maximum possible latency needed
>>because the 132000 maximum (only maximum if you will ever reach that )
the
>>author suggests uses 1 mb memory per vertex instance , so for 32 audio
tracks
>>with vertex 32mb will be needed, for 64 paris audio tracks with vertex
64
>>mb will be needed.
>>I aggree with the author's 132000 samples as maximum ,if you will ever
reach
>>that I say again.
>>Normally you would never pass 1000 without uad1 plugins...
>>Regards,
>>Dimitrios
>>Chas. Duncan <duncan5199ATsbcglobalDOTnet@> wrote:
>>>
>>>Gene/Dimitrios:
>>>
>>>Would it even be necessary to "pick from a list" or "assign" total
>>>delay? Seems like the total delay would simply be as low (or as high)
>>>as needed to compensate for the plugins used. (Unless I'm missing
>>>something, which is always a possibility...)
>>>
>>>As for me -- I'm still on 98, 512 ram -- could I run this thing right
>>>now, just to compensate for EDS fx offsets, submix offsets, etc.?
>>>
>>>-- interested in how this turns out -- thanks -- chas.
>>>
>>>
>>>On 23 Jan 2007 02:54:04 +1000, "Gene Lennon"
>>><glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is what the author wrote about his latency addon for vertex..!!
>>>>>Track 1 has a latency of 16384 samples. The same is true for track 2.
>>As
>>>>>track 1 and track 2 have the same latency they are already in sync,
but
>>>>all
>>>>>other tracks (the remaining 46 tracks) have to be delayed by 16384 samples,
>>>>>not 32768.
>>>>>
>>>>>Take another example: Track 1 has a plug-in with 16384 samples of latency.
>>>>>Track 2 has a plug-in with a latency of 8192 samples. What FaderWorks
&
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77499 is a reply to message #77482] |
Tue, 26 December 2006 22:05 |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message =
news:45b64aaa$1@linux...
Dear Jeff,
This is what makes this author a nice guy ...
I proposed it to him to be added on his vertex and he reacted in a =
very positive
way improving my idea and promissing a couple of weeks for this update =
to
his vertex that will include the latency compensator.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dimitrios
Jeff hoover <jkhoover@excite-DOT-com> wrote:
>So is the compensator already in the product, or do we have a =
timeline=20
>for it?
>
>Hoov
>
>Dimitrios wrote:
>> Great Chris !
>> Please email him too saying that you are a Paris users that has =
been informed
>> about the latency compensator !
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>>=20
>> "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>>=20
>>>That is awesome. Buying it now...
>>>
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dear Phil,
>>>>You probably have read that I said allign all 31 audio tracks to =
16376
>>=20
>> I
>>=20
>>>>meant to 16384 which already was so, so it just adds 12 samples to =
track
>>>>10.
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Dimitrios
>>>>
>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>>According to the author you just have to type the latency on the =
vertex
>>>>
>>>>instance
>>>>
>>>>>you are putting a plugin and then vertex takes care of the rest =
!!
>>>>>Here is how it will work...
>>>>>You open vertex dsp on every audio track on your 2 card system.
>>>>>You can save that as a template for further projects.
>>>>>Now lets say you open on track 1 a plugin that has 16384 samples =
latency
>>>>>, you just type 16384 on that vertex's instance of audio track 1 =
and
vertex
>>>>>takes care of the rest 31 audio tracks to get alligned.
>>>>>Now you put a plugin on track 10 which has a latency of 16376 =
,you just
>>>>
>>>>type
>>>>
>>>>>that number on track's 10 vertex instance and so vertex takes =
care of
>>=20
>> the
>>=20
>>>>>rest 31 audio tracks again meaning that it delays all other =
tracks in
>>=20
>> a
>>=20
>>>>way
>>>>
>>>>>that all have this 16376 latency, menaing again that it just adds =
12
samples
>>>>>to track 10 and lives all other 31 audio tracks with same
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77503 is a reply to message #77476] |
Wed, 27 December 2006 04:19 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;>>>On 23 Jan 2007 04:25:42 +1000, "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> =
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Well there is no pick from the list thing.
>>>>>>>>If you read all the posts you will understand that the latency =
is
due
>>>>>
>>>>>to
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>the amount you manually type on a ceratin vertex instance vst =
plugin.
>>>>>>>>so if you put a 64 samples latent vst plugin you just type 64=20
>>>>>
>>>>>and all other
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>audio tracks get delayed that amount !
>>>>>>>>The author just asks how much would be the maximum possible =
latency
>>>
>>>needed
>>>
>>>>>>>>because the 132000 maximum (only maximum if you will ever =
reach that
>>>>
>>>>)
>>>>
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>author suggests uses 1 mb memory per vertex instance , so for =
32
audio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>tracks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>with vertex 32mb will be needed, for 64 paris audio tracks =
with vertex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>64
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>mb will be needed.
>>>>>>>>I aggree with the author's 132000 samples as maximum ,if you =
will
ever
>>>>>>
>>>>>>reach
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>that I say again.
>>>>>>>>Normally you would never pass 1000 without uad1 plugins...
>>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>>Dimitrios
>>>>>>>>Chas. Duncan <duncan5199ATsbcglobalDOTnet@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Gene/Dimitrios:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Would it even be necessary to "pick from a list" or "assign" =
total
>>>>>>>>>delay? Seems like the total delay would simply be as low (or =
as
high)
>>>>>>>>>as needed to compensate for the plugins used. (Unless I'm =
missing
>>>>>>>>>something, which is always a possibility...)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>As for me -- I'm still on 98, 512 ram -- could I run this =
thing
right
>>>>>>>>>now, just to compensate for EDS fx offsets, submix offsets, =
etc.?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-- interested in how this turns out -- thanks -- chas.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 23 Jan 2007 02:54:04 +1000, "Gene Lennon"
>>>>>>>>><glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's everyone doing for headphone monitoring? [message #77521 is a reply to message #77508] |
Wed, 27 December 2006 14:06 |
Rob Arsenault
Messages: 152
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ensator.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dimitrios
Jeff hoover <jkhoover@excite-DOT-com> wrote:
>So is the compensator already in the product, or do we have a =
timeline=20
>for it?
>
>Hoov
>
>Dimitrios wrote:
>> Great Chris !
>> Please email him too saying that you are a Paris users that has =
been informed
>> about the latency compensator !
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>>=20
>> "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>>=20
>>>That is awesome. Buying it now...
>>>
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dear Phil,
>>>>You probably have read that I said allign all 31 audio tracks to =
16376
>>=20
>> I
>>=20
>>>>meant to 16384 which already was so, so it just adds 12 samples =
to track
>>>>10.
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Dimitrios
>>>>
>>>>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>>According to the author you just have to type the latency on =
the vertex
>>>>
>>>>instance
>>>>
>>>>>you are putting a plugin and then vertex takes care of the rest =
!!
>>>>>Here is how it will work...
>>>>>You open vertex dsp on every audio track on your 2 card system.
>>>>>You can save that as a template for further projects.
>>>>>Now lets say you open on track 1 a plugin that has 16384 =
samples latency
>>>>>, you just type 16384 on that vertex's instance of audio track =
1 and
vertex
>>>>>takes care of the rest 31 audio tracks to get alligned.
>>>>>Now you put a plugin on track 10 which has a latency of 16376 =
,you just
>>>>
>>>>type
>>>>
>>>>>that number on track's 10 vertex instance and so vertex takes =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
