| Bounce to disk issue [message #97660] |
Mon, 31 March 2008 12:06  |
Bill T
Messages: 1 Registered: March 2008
|
Junior Member |
|
|
't think that's a good trade.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "Mike Bloomer" <tubeguru2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Micro XP is a hacked stripped down version of XP.It's apparently popular
>>>
>> with
>>
>>> gamers... A friend at work got a hold of a copy and I had a chance to
try
>>> it.I work at a computer repair shop and the idea behind trying it w
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Bounce to disk issue [message #97701 is a reply to message #97662] |
Tue, 01 April 2008 10:57   |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ius, not Wes's brother.
Sure, TM was a piano player, but if Wes is funky, so was Thelonius.
Nowadays, I'd say it's Charlie Hunter. But what do I know?
Funk. What a concept. Originally it meant "smelly."
-steve the couldn'tbementionedinthesamepostwiththeseguys guitar player
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>Many of us may not think of Wes Montgomery as a "funky" player, but
>listening to a bunch of his tracks today, I realized he was perhaps the
>funkiest cat that ever strummed a guitar. His thumb-only (no pick) right
>hand technique, which limited his lead runs to shorter phrases, also
>gave him some chops that I have never heard anyone equal in the
>strumming area.
>
>For those who don't know much about Wes, I highly recommend giving him a
>long listen. He was a truly unique and innovative player who's potential
>appeal is much wider than the typical jazz artist.
>
>If you can find it there's a live cut of "Tequila" (one of his "hits")
>that scared me so much I dropped the tune from my solo repertoire.HI Tom,
Who knows maybe it will work with both Paris and the EDS hardware being
forced to run on a single CPU. makes the C16 work.
Chris
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Deej,
>
> Ya, ME is not
|
|
|
|
| Re: Bounce to disk issue [message #97722 is a reply to message #97701] |
Wed, 02 April 2008 09:07   |
Sandy Tipping
 Messages: 54 Registered: June 2007
|
Member |
|
|
ubmix 2 or 3 and don't care about the latency difference in beetween these
cards because you have taken care of it already !
I can send my default preset ( 5 cards ) and if this works for you then you
will gain all the time needed to load on all paris tracks faderworks ( OK
this is for faderworks users only !) and allign for the latency differences.
Thats for now...
Regards,
DimitriosHey Dan,
I am not too keen on the way tabs are put together these days. In fact
about 20 plus years ago I learned to play guitar from song books that had
normal tabs above the chord of the songs. Mainly Bob Dylan type songs.
Anyway, looking at the way it is fingered... personally I wouldn't even
mess with trying to be a sharp-shooter and position my fingers the way they
lay this out on their fret board. The chord is in the key of F... I would
personal bar the F and then start picking up fingers to get as close as possible.
Heck afterall, Jimmi Page admits that he can't remember the true chords
that he played on Stairway to Heavan. There are so many renditions out there...
there are no wrong way if it sounds close...
That is the way I approach many cover songs. I mostly learn by ear...
and stay away from other people's mistakes... except when you come across
songs when the guitar is really fuzzed out. An example is "Where the River
Flows" by Collective Soul. Back in my early teen-type days, I would go to
a guitar shop and get one of the pros to show me how it is played... I don't
have that anymore... But it is so easy, it is a difficult progression to
figure out... and if you seen the tabs on that song.. ha!
Anyway, when you have troubling 9th and 12th chords... just bar the major,
or even the minor and start pickin fingers up. You be surprised how close
you can get to just about anything... use that until you perfect the finger
portion...
Good Luck!
~ Ed
"D.P." <guitar.ottawa@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm trying to learn finger-picking, and am working on a song where one of
>the chords gives me some trouble:
>
>0 1 0 3 X 1
&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: Bounce to disk issue [message #97820 is a reply to message #97722] |
Mon, 07 April 2008 15:00  |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
concerts4u@prodigy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> My name is Ron and this is my first post, but have had the system since
> 1999.
>> Please add me to your number and I am thrilled to find an active site for
>> Paris. I have spent about 4 hours today trying to learn more. My brain has
>> forgotten much since I just dusted my system off after a few years of not
>> being set up.
>>
>> Hey anyone know of any body in the Denver Colorado area that is a user?
>>
>> Thanks guys for the help in advance.
>> ron
>> "Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Spot on, Rod.
>>> I know two guys that have never posted.
>>> Hell, I built and configured their host comps for them.
>>> One is a friend who is happily using my "spare parts",
>>> (a mec with 8-in, a c-16 and two EDS's) as a stand alone system.
>>> I also know *of* several other users, but not personally.
>>> They're out there...
>>> Kim
>>>
>>>
>>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, it could be a litle bigger. I know of two Paris users I'm in regular
>>>> contact with, that to my knowledge, have never posted on this sight. So
>>> I'm
>>>> thinking there might be a few more of us that post here that might have
>>> similar
>>>> contacts that just don't post. Probably not a large number, but then again,
>>>> maybe more than you might think. For example, if ther are 400 users world
>>>> wide, and 100 of them have 2 people they know of (like me) that have never
>>>> posted, that's 200 more users right there.
>>>> Or not, I don't know. just thinking.
>>>> Rod
>>>> Kerry Galloway <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi folks. Herešs one of a series of updates/info posts (and - brace
>>>>> yourselves - some action requests) which Išll be putting in separate
> posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Išve been working on some basic infrastructure that I reckon we need
> to
>>>>> support any forward motion. Blog/wiki/networking/development rig are
>>>>> certainly part of that infrastructure but we also had a serious need
> for
>>>>> hard info - things like current
|
|
|
|