|
|
| Re: eSession [message #93546 is a reply to message #93543] |
Wed, 12 December 2007 17:12   |
|
|
the gig off without anyone except a few =
knowing I was in pain. I had no strength in my left pinkie and I ghosted =
all of my low B and Bb's. I feel your pain.
Rich
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:479f7a61@linux...
Bill,
Do you really want to know? Okay here's the story.
The Pats had beat the NY Giants for the first time this season
and the beer was flowing. Now the game was long over and
three of us took a walk downstairs at about 3:30 AM to shoot
some pool. The other two had already started as I was on my
way down the 1930s wooden staircase. I made it 2/3 of the
way down when my left foot decided to go left just enough
to get lodged into the unfinished wall's studs. My upper
body continued down the last four stairs as if nothing was=20
out of the ordinary. Snap! There goes my leg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: eSession [message #93573 is a reply to message #93549] |
Thu, 13 December 2007 11:32  |
Nei
Messages: 108 Registered: November 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
Neil
"Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Pretty psyched, just plunked down the jack for a quad core, 2gb 800 ram,
and
>sata drive. I'm going to recycle one of my old cases. I'm planning on rigging
>up Reaper. (Paris is going no where.) I'm hoping this will allow for a totally
>ITB solution. I'll definately report on the track and vsti/vst counts once
>I get it built and some projects rolling. It will really streamline my
workflow,
>well more like workdribble, but it should be a really sweet dribble :-)
>Thanks all for the input and help on this. I can't wait to uncork the soda
>buzz, and lego the thing together. Hmmm... overclocking...
>MRagree... overclocking is not necessary and will generally mean odd
deliveries of bad news down the road.
AA
"Neil" <OIUOUI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:47a01003$1@linux...
>
> Don't mess with overclocking... not worth it in terms of stress
> & potential instability on your system, and you really
> shouldn't need it these days - i'm running gazillions of tracks
> at very heinous parameters (88.2k/24-bit) with lots of plugins
> and yeah sometimes I have to freeze some tracks with certain
> CPU-intensive plugins inserted, but i don't need to overclock
> on an off-the-shelf Gateway dualcore (OS-Optimized, for a
> dedicated DAW platform, of course), running CubaseSX.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> "Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>Pretty psyched, just plunked down the jack for a quad core, 2gb 800 ram,
> and
>>sata drive. I'm going to recycle one of my old cases. I'm planning on
>>rigging
>>up Reaper. (Paris is going no where.) I'm hoping this will allow for a
>>totally
>>ITB solution. I'll definately report on the track and vsti/vst counts
>>once
>>I get it built and some projec
|
|
|
|