|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mastrox P750.....man does this thing ever suck, or what? [message #67123 is a reply to message #67091] |
Thu, 20 April 2006 06:35   |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
">kmf162hr3bc88eu59vaumo0q7pq2e1ad4b@4ax.com...
> Yeah, I've had my eye on the "True" box for a while, for a =
go-anywhere
> laptop rig I'm thinking about putting together. If you look on =
their
> site and see who's using their stuff -- kind of convincing...
>
> Maybe they'd send you one for a test-drive...
>
> Keep us posted -- Chas.
>
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2006 08:41:11 -0300, "Rob Arsenault"
> <info@studiomanitou.com> wrote:
>
> >Funny you should mention the True Systems Precision 8, that's =
exactly the=20
> >one I have in mind...!! $1999.00 CA
> >
> >
> >"Chas. Duncan" <duncan5199ATsbcglobalDOTnet@> wrote in message=20
> >news:v6nv52d4j7bvupp0ic6gakhrtmit8p8j8u@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> If I had money for 8 channels right now, I'd be looking at the =
True
> >> Systems Precision 8 for clean, and maybe the UA 8110 Precision =
8
> >> monster with the tubes (and the cool blue lights...) for the =
more
> >> old-school "phat" thing...
> >>
> >> And yeah, they're both named "Precision" -- possibly because =
great
> >> marketers think alike...
> >>
> >> -- buy one, and tell us how cool it is -- Chas.
> >&
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mastrox P750.....man does this thing ever suck, or what? [message #67129 is a reply to message #67123] |
Thu, 20 April 2006 10:52 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
w being used as a doorstop. He went on to =
renumerate a
few reasons why he thought it sucked and also opined that Quantec and =
Sony
made far superior products. I took that to heart and though I do own =
Lexicon
products, I also own Quantec and Sony units as well and I have been =
very
happy with them so I'm gonna' have to buy him a drink when we meet up
eventually.
;o)
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message =
news:446211d1$1@linux...
>
> Paris interface is still the best looking in daw Hands-Down. It's =
really a
> shame that even after all these years, no other DAW has come close =
to it's
> (Paris) Pro, polished well laid-out
> Gui.. That, my friend(s) is Real Talent..
> Steve, may your soul rest with the Lord forever..LaMont
>
>
> "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
> >
> >I never met or spoke with SSC, but:
> >
> >I just submitted some tracks to a very talented mix engineer,
> >so he could mix my latest project, and save me a bunch of time,
> >and I could get out on the old mountain bike for once.
> >
> >He spent 10 hours mixing a song on his PT HD rig. He e-mailed
> >me to let me know that he would pass on the mixing. He could
> >not get the PT mix to sound as good as the rough mix that I
> >dithered down to an .mp3 and e-mailed him as a reference.
> >
> >At higher levels, the PT mix would get "harsh", in his words,
> >while the Paris mix was "buttery". This guy had no previous
> >experience with Paris, and is passing up income to give this
> >project back to me.
> >
> >I really wanted to go mountain biking, but I am amazed at the
> >continued relevance of Paris, here in 2006. That's a pretty
> >cool legacy of SSC.
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
